Author Topic: wally  (Read 3504 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PandaXpanda

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1295
  • "is it too soon after 9/11 to be wearing pleats?"
    • View Profile
wally
« on: July 23, 2010, 03:35:00 PM »
At kci. Black hat (flat bill worn backwards ), white vneck... no neck brace.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
aren't you glad it wasn't you? - g.h.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16971
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2010, 03:38:20 PM »
sneak up to him and shove his head in an awkward direction. report back on if he winces, and how bad it appeared to hurt. tia.
 :bball:

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2010, 03:41:57 PM »
Damn, I thought we were going to have an update on what color neck brace he is wearing now. :bang:

Offline PandaXpanda

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1295
  • "is it too soon after 9/11 to be wearing pleats?"
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2010, 03:43:40 PM »
Looks like he's ready to fly high.
aren't you glad it wasn't you? - g.h.

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2010, 03:48:55 PM »
Being 6'9"+ is horrible for the average human being.

Offline TheMadCatter

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 635
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2010, 05:16:40 PM »
Being 6'9"+ is horrible for the average human being.

Anyone who is 6'9"+ isn't an average human being to begin with, so this statement makes no sense.

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2010, 07:35:52 PM »
Being 6'9"+ is horrible for the average human being.

Anyone who is 6'9"+ isn't an average human being to begin with, so this statement makes no sense.
:lol:
EMAW

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: wally
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2010, 03:22:54 PM »
Please re-read.