"ksu has been decimated. They only bring back 10 starters total. That QB Coffman sucks. That RB Thomas is a straight North-South runner which usually does not fare well against Will Muschamp's defenses. Their pass defense is pretty salty but by that time, we should hopefully have established our "new and improved" running game which is the ksu achilles' heal."
p!ss poor analysis in my opinion.
First of all while returning 10 starters total seems like legitimate concerns, however both wide receiver spots are uprgaded by new additions, the offensive line returns 4 of 5 starters and 2 other players with significant potential and experience, the backfield is upgraded by growth and development of both returning backs (not to mention that depth is better hubert, powell, robinson (assuming no rs) > Valentine. QB is a question mark but Gregory while gutsy is not irreplaceable.
Defensively our pass defense and ability to generate a pass rush are two legitimate concerns for this defense plus two safeties are recovering from injury and two corners moved need to be replaced. Run defense is at best questionable with major questions about front four rotation and linebacker play.
also does "new and improved running game" mean that their quaterback didn't lead them in rushing?