Author Topic: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang (Read 20024 times)

Super PurpleCat · « **Reply #300 on:** March 12, 2025, 08:53:17 PM »

Hobby sport

michigancat · « **Reply #301 on:** March 12, 2025, 09:44:23 PM »

Quote from: GregKSU1027 on March 12, 2025, 07:57:57 PM

Welp… 16-17 (9-11) in conference. Disappointing but i truly have no idea where we go from here

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Up!

GregKSU1027 · « **Reply #302 on:** March 12, 2025, 09:48:04 PM »

Quote from: Super PurpleCat on March 12, 2025, 08:53:17 PM

Hobby sport

BASEBALL SCHOOL

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mocat · « **Reply #303 on:** March 12, 2025, 10:38:40 PM »

1-0 in our last 1 halves

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #304 on:** March 12, 2025, 11:27:08 PM »

It’s okay guys. Cus (insert coach here) did it. It’s okay if Jerome Tang misses the tourney 2-3 years in a row.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OK_Cat · « **Reply #305 on:** March 13, 2025, 08:25:57 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on March 10, 2025, 07:07:42 AM

Quote from: Benja on March 09, 2025, 10:05:32 PM
What I hate now that he’s losing is his pressers. He literally says the same things every time. He doesn’t seem all that bothered by losing. The signs are there. All hat no cattle. We’ve seen this. I really don’t want him to veer into Ron prince territory.

I can really only think of one thing about Tang that reminds me of Ron Prince

you're not supposed to say the quiet part outloud

Cire · « **Reply #306 on:** March 13, 2025, 10:57:34 AM »

I'm happy to give Tang at least 2 years, if he can't make some noise in the next 2 years, move on when the buyout is lower.

CNS · « **Reply #307 on:** March 13, 2025, 11:05:17 AM »

The challenge is going to be keeping NIL high for 2 years so that he can take legitimate swings.

wetwillie · « **Reply #308 on:** March 13, 2025, 11:54:38 AM »

Quote from: CNS on March 13, 2025, 11:05:17 AM

The challenge is going to be keeping NIL high for 2 years so that he can take legitimate swings.

Revenue sharing takes care of this

Skipper44 · « **Reply #309 on:** March 13, 2025, 01:12:31 PM »

Quote from: wetwillie on March 13, 2025, 11:54:38 AM

Quote from: CNS on March 13, 2025, 11:05:17 AM
The challenge is going to be keeping NIL high for 2 years so that he can take legitimate swings.

Revenue sharing takes care of this

won't that just set the floor for high major programs? Booster money will still be needed imo

Cire · « **Reply #310 on:** March 13, 2025, 02:43:00 PM »

Quote from: Skipper44 on March 13, 2025, 01:12:31 PM

Quote from: wetwillie on March 13, 2025, 11:54:38 AM
Quote from: CNS on March 13, 2025, 11:05:17 AM
The challenge is going to be keeping NIL high for 2 years so that he can take legitimate swings.

Revenue sharing takes care of this
won't that just set the floor for high major programs? Booster money will still be needed imo

going to go back under the table for the booster money IMO. Look for Kansas to have a big rebound

wetwillie · « **Reply #311 on:** March 13, 2025, 04:19:08 PM »

I don't agree but maybe I'm Naive

CNS · « **Reply #312 on:** March 13, 2025, 04:23:34 PM »

Quote from: wetwillie on March 13, 2025, 11:54:38 AM

Quote from: CNS on March 13, 2025, 11:05:17 AM
The challenge is going to be keeping NIL high for 2 years so that he can take legitimate swings.

Revenue sharing takes care of this

When does this kick in?

wetwillie · « **Reply #313 on:** March 13, 2025, 05:05:44 PM »

This upcoming season

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #314 on:** March 13, 2025, 05:10:49 PM »

Next FY I believe, which starts 7/1

CNS · « **Reply #315 on:** March 13, 2025, 06:03:33 PM »

This is going to be interesting

Justwin · « **Reply #316 on:** March 14, 2025, 04:29:35 PM »

In terms of revenue sharing, the way it is set up now, for an athlete to receive NIL money it will have to be true NIL. It can't just be getting paid to play at a school. Any NIL deal that is over $600 will have to be reported and it will be evaluated by Deloitte to see if it is at a true market level for the athlete.

I'm sure this will get challenged in court with a high likelihood of the NCAA losing.

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #317 on:** March 14, 2025, 05:40:33 PM »

So like, I could have a player in a commercial for my business and pay them $2 million?

CNS · « **Reply #318 on:** March 14, 2025, 06:22:07 PM »

Quote from: Stevesie60 on March 14, 2025, 05:40:33 PM

So like, I could have a player in a commercial for my business and pay them $2 million?

Sounds like JW is saying that Deloitte would have to agree that $2m is reasonable market value for that work.

This is probably what will be easy to challenge in court. Any person should be able to charge whatever they can get another person to pay to be in their commercial, whether that be $2 or $2million dollars, and Deloitte can kiss their ass.

catastrophe · « **Reply #319 on:** **Today** at 03:07:06 PM »

Unless the distinction is relevant for taxes, in which case you can bet the IRS will care whether it’s market.