Author Topic: We look bad  (Read 1409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
We look bad
« on: November 10, 2023, 08:53:04 PM »
 :cry:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: We look bad
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2023, 09:01:29 PM »
It wasn't great.

Offline EMAWzifried

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2633
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2023, 09:16:57 PM »
No energy, especially in the second half. Miss Nowell's fire on the floor. There's no leadership stepping holding team accountable. And Kaluma just isn't a shooter, which I think is obvious to everyone but him. Second half defense was just horrid.
Need Tomlin back bad.,

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2023, 09:53:31 PM »
I thought it was fine. :dunno:

Missie should always do color for the men's games

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9377
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2023, 09:57:56 PM »
Didnt watch a single second but willing to imagine getting this team time to figure things out is fine/normal.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2023, 10:04:11 PM »
I thought it was fine. :dunno:

Missie should always do color for the men's games

She a baller?
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2023, 10:44:14 PM »
It’s because it’s not Tanguary yet dummy

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11816
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2023, 10:56:25 PM »
Didn’t watch and I saw we won so seems like we are pretty good
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41987
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2023, 01:23:05 AM »
If a team looks bad in an espn+ forest…

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2023, 07:05:51 AM »
Peggy Po's

1. TP2 is a really good shooter
2. Dai Dai is emerging as our lead PG
3. Cam plays great D and can still get to the rack
4. McNair is quality depth in the post

1. Kaluma is a big drop off from KJ
2. No leader on the floor
3. Team defense when our best offensive lineup is in, is atrocious.

When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2023, 08:27:51 AM »
Our help D and off ball D near the basket is not good.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2023, 09:15:53 AM »
The defense being bad is just all the new guys figuring it out.

Much more concerned if this offense is gonna work


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2023, 09:19:54 AM »
Art is kind of the turd in the punch bowl offensively right now.  Not getting nearly enough out of him.  Hoping RJ comes on a bit more too, he's someone that should be able to get his own shot on offense.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline EMAWzifried

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2633
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2023, 11:51:17 AM »
Art is kind of the turd in the punch bowl offensively right now.  Not getting nearly enough out of him.  Hoping RJ comes on a bit more too, he's someone that should be able to get his own shot on offense.
When ask in the post-game interview what Kaluma needed to do to improve his offensive production, Tang said "buy in" twice very tersely. I suppose that means taking shots off the offense and not jacking up jumpshots.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2023, 03:09:08 AM »
I thought it was fine. :dunno:

Missie should always do color for the men's games

Yeah, we're fine. Looked like crap early last year too. The defense needs work but it will be better.

Having Missy do sidelines while Stan Weber is the analyst is absolutely mumped up. Ben Boyle is a sack of crap for that.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2023, 08:01:37 AM »
I thought it was fine. :dunno:

Missie should always do color for the men's games

Yeah, we're fine. Looked like crap early last year too. The defense needs work but it will be better.

Having Missy do sidelines while Stan Weber is the analyst is absolutely mumped up. Ben Boyle is a sack of crap for that.
Should have had her do pbp, and let the student reporter do sideline. This year's student reporter is really good from what I've seen.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #16 on: November 12, 2023, 08:02:36 AM »
I thought it was fine. :dunno:

Missie should always do color for the men's games

Yeah, we're fine. Looked like crap early last year too. The defense needs work but it will be better.

Having Missy do sidelines while Stan Weber is the analyst is absolutely mumped up. Ben Boyle is a sack of crap for that.
Should have had her do pbp, and let the student reporter do sideline. This year's student reporter is really good from what I've seen.

Also, Stan is laughably bad. Like it's almost endearing how bad he is

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #17 on: November 12, 2023, 09:16:01 AM »
I was forced into Wyattvision for a bit during the Fball game yesterday and I was reminded that Stan is the consummate mansplainer who cannot explain the action on the field (or court) succinctly.

I enjoy Missy on the TV, and Matt W pretty good on color for b-ball radio.


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46508
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #18 on: November 12, 2023, 11:23:45 AM »
i feel like missy tries to hard but she (read: anyone) is better than ben boyle


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #19 on: November 12, 2023, 12:52:44 PM »
Peggy Po's

1. TP2 is a really good shooter
2. Dai Dai is emerging as our lead PG
3. Cam plays great D and can still get to the rack
4. McNair is quality depth in the post

1. Kaluma is a big drop off from KJ
2. No leader on the floor
3. Team defense when our best offensive lineup is in, is atrocious.
I agree with most of this. We look like a bunch of really talented players (dudes) who haven't played together as a structured team (& without assertive leadership) for enough time yet. Coach & the staff need to keep pushing & pruning in developmental ways. Also, there are few leaders on the planet like Markquis Nowell. And, there are even fewer PGs who can do what he does. I suspect Ques coming back - if he is the pure PG that I understand him to be - will be a big help. We will have some frustrating evenings (like the USC game). There will be some flashes of brilliance (Cam's dunk, Dai Dai's razzle & dazzle). I look forward to seeing how we look in late January through March.
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21448
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #20 on: November 12, 2023, 12:58:56 PM »
To be fair, no team this early in the year is going to look impressive against a juggernaut like Bellarmine.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2023, 03:53:32 PM by Spracne »

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2023, 01:33:17 PM »
Too be fair, no team this early in the year is going to look impressive against a juggernaut like Bellarmine.
High BBIQ post, Sprac-ster! :Wha:
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6537
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #22 on: November 12, 2023, 05:06:29 PM »
On the basketball board his name should be Spraquille O’Neal (mods?)

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11816
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #23 on: November 12, 2023, 05:28:38 PM »
On the basketball board his name should be Spraquille O’Neal (mods?)

That might be pushing the limits of the capabilities on this blog site.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21448
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: We look bad
« Reply #24 on: November 12, 2023, 05:30:31 PM »
On the basketball board his name should be Spraquille O’Neal (mods?)

That might be pushing the limits of the capabilities on this blog site.

Yeah, we can't even be bothered to embiid x.com links.