2024 Presidential Race

[Katpappy]

Note to Maga:  do you think this self-important POS should be our next POTUS?

BREAKING: Leaked video shows Donald Trump saying he thinks Kamala Harris will be the Democrat nominee, says she is "so f**king bad."

"She's so bad. She's so pathetic. She's just so f**king bad."

"How did I do with the debate the other night? I kicked that old, broken down pile of cr*p. He's quitting the race."

"I got him out the race, and that means we have Kamala. I think she's going to be better. She's so bad. She's so pathetic. She's just so f**king bad."

"Can you imagine [Biden] with dealing with Putin and the president of China, who's a fierce person? He's a fierce man. Very tough guy.".

[Kat Kid]

how racial identities function in america is how you know we're a christian nation.

*excluding Arab Christians

[bucket]

https://x.com/lordsnow/status/1808493742447267910

[wetwillie]

Man that hits

[cfbandyman]

Man that hits

We're getting a dictator and the ones who want freedom are welcoming it. It's sickening

[Stupid Fitz]

Man that hits

We're getting a dictator and the ones who want freedom are welcoming it. It's sickening

I mean, it actually tracks pretty well.

They also like the bible and want that and the 10 commandments in schools and........
They also like the constitution as is and........
They also hate big city billionaires and......

IT IS A CULT. The one true thing this fuckhead has ever said is that he could shoot someone and his voters wouldn't care. He's right, because IT IS A CULT.

[cfbandyman]

Man that hits

We're getting a dictator and the ones who want freedom are welcoming it. It's sickening

I mean, it actually tracks pretty well.

They also like the bible and want that and the 10 commandments in schools and........
They also like the constitution as is and........
They also hate big city billionaires and......

IT IS A CULT. The one true thing this fuckhead has ever said is that he could shoot someone and his voters wouldn't care. He's right, because IT IS A CULT.

Yup, even if we had a simply worded amendment "All individuals, regardless of office or title shall be subject to the laws of the United States of America" it won't pass. It's not what they want.

[sonofdaxjones]

This whole "we're getting a dictator" trope is  on the backdrop (again) of recent SCOTUS decisions stopping this authoritarian administration.

Then add in the fact that (for example) the current SOS orchestrated one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in US political history to protect the pending puppet President in the 2020 election cycle and you get the #chefskiss of authoritarianism.

Even defrocked but one time #blueanon/Coronabro bobble head and t-shirt worthy super hero Andrew "must see press conference" Cuomo said he would not have brought the Trump case in NY and he called it, in so many words, a disgrace in a recent TV appearance.

[Stupid Fitz]

This whole "we're getting a dictator" trope is  on the backdrop (again) of recent SCOTUS decisions stopping this authoritarian administration.

Then add in the fact that (for example) the current SOS orchestrated one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in US political history to protect the pending puppet President in the 2020 election cycle and you get the #chefskiss of authoritarianism.

Even defrocked but one time #blueanon/Coronabro bobble head and t-shirt worthy super hero Andrew "must see press conference" Cuomo said he would not have brought the Trump case in NY and he called it, in so many words, a disgrace in a recent TV appearance.

I'm a normal human being that doesn't watch fox/msnbc news so I don't follow all of this stuff religiously and quite frankly you terrify me so I'll probably regret even replying here but, I'm not sure I understand the argument of "the case shouldn't have even been brought". From what I understand, he was found guilty of like 30 some counts by an independent group of jurors that were reviewed and approved of by his team. Was he guilty of something or not?

[sonofdaxjones]

This whole "we're getting a dictator" trope is  on the backdrop (again) of recent SCOTUS decisions stopping this authoritarian administration.

Then add in the fact that (for example) the current SOS orchestrated one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in US political history to protect the pending puppet President in the 2020 election cycle and you get the #chefskiss of authoritarianism.

Even defrocked but one time #blueanon/Coronabro bobble head and t-shirt worthy super hero Andrew "must see press conference" Cuomo said he would not have brought the Trump case in NY and he called it, in so many words, a disgrace in a recent TV appearance.

I'm a normal human being that doesn't watch fox/msnbc news so I don't follow all of this stuff religiously and quite frankly you terrify me so I'll probably regret even replying here but, I'm not sure I understand the argument of "the case shouldn't have even been brought". From what I understand, he was found guilty of like 30 some counts by an independent group of jurors that were reviewed and approved of by his team. Was he guilty of something or not?

I don't watch those channels either, friend.

Yes, he was a guilty of a crime in a #blueanon stranglehold state, no one with a brain is the least bit surprised by that, and numerous people, including hardcore #blueanon lawyers say it will be overturned in appeal.

But that's just one component of what I posted. Thankfully our SCOTUS is stopping the fascists we have in the West Wing right now.

[bucket]

This whole "we're getting a dictator" trope is  on the backdrop (again) of recent SCOTUS decisions stopping this authoritarian administration.

Then add in the fact that (for example) the current SOS orchestrated one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in US political history to protect the pending puppet President in the 2020 election cycle and you get the #chefskiss of authoritarianism.

Even defrocked but one time #blueanon/Coronabro bobble head and t-shirt worthy super hero Andrew "must see press conference" Cuomo said he would not have brought the Trump case in NY and he called it, in so many words, a disgrace in a recent TV appearance.

I'm a normal human being that doesn't watch fox/msnbc news so I don't follow all of this stuff religiously and quite frankly you terrify me so I'll probably regret even replying here but, I'm not sure I understand the argument of "the case shouldn't have even been brought". From what I understand, he was found guilty of like 30 some counts by an independent group of jurors that were reviewed and approved of by his team. Was he guilty of something or not?

From what I've read and what I mostly agree with, it's like the Hunter Biden gun case, they're charges that almost never make it to court. The reason for both cases being political bias. The problem I have with Trump is this crap only raised eyebrows because he didn't release his taxes like every other presidential candidate. Therefore, he had the decision of not running for president and keeping his questionable accounting practices private or running, withholding tax returns and being under scrutiny.

[BIG APPLE CAT]

This whole "we're getting a dictator" trope is  on the backdrop (again) of recent SCOTUS decisions stopping this authoritarian administration.

Then add in the fact that (for example) the current SOS orchestrated one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in US political history to protect the pending puppet President in the 2020 election cycle and you get the #chefskiss of authoritarianism.

Even defrocked but one time #blueanon/Coronabro bobble head and t-shirt worthy super hero Andrew "must see press conference" Cuomo said he would not have brought the Trump case in NY and he called it, in so many words, a disgrace in a recent TV appearance.

I'm a normal human being that doesn't watch fox/msnbc news so I don't follow all of this stuff religiously and quite frankly you terrify me so I'll probably regret even replying here but, I'm not sure I understand the argument of "the case shouldn't have even been brought". From what I understand, he was found guilty of like 30 some counts by an independent group of jurors that were reviewed and approved of by his team. Was he guilty of something or not?

I don't watch those channels either, friend.

Yes, he was a guilty of a crime in a #blueanon stranglehold state, no one with a brain is the least bit surprised by that, and numerous people, including hardcore #blueanon lawyers say it will be overturned in appeal.

But that's just one component of what I posted. Thankfully our SCOTUS is stopping the fascists we have in the West Wing right now.

Fitz I’m sure I will regret replying to one of Dax’s pudding brain talking points, but the reason he was tried in a #blueanon stronghold state is because that is where the crimes were committed. It really is that simple. If he would have committed these crimes in Wyoming, he would have been tried in Wyoming. (And then Dax would somehow pivot to calling Wyoming a #blueanon stronghold)

If Donald didn’t want to get tried in New York, then he shouldn’t have committed those crimes in New York

[sonofdaxjones]

This whole "we're getting a dictator" trope is  on the backdrop (again) of recent SCOTUS decisions stopping this authoritarian administration.

Then add in the fact that (for example) the current SOS orchestrated one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in US political history to protect the pending puppet President in the 2020 election cycle and you get the #chefskiss of authoritarianism.

Even defrocked but one time #blueanon/Coronabro bobble head and t-shirt worthy super hero Andrew "must see press conference" Cuomo said he would not have brought the Trump case in NY and he called it, in so many words, a disgrace in a recent TV appearance.

I'm a normal human being that doesn't watch fox/msnbc news so I don't follow all of this stuff religiously and quite frankly you terrify me so I'll probably regret even replying here but, I'm not sure I understand the argument of "the case shouldn't have even been brought". From what I understand, he was found guilty of like 30 some counts by an independent group of jurors that were reviewed and approved of by his team. Was he guilty of something or not?

I don't watch those channels either, friend.

Yes, he was a guilty of a crime in a #blueanon stranglehold state, no one with a brain is the least bit surprised by that, and numerous people, including hardcore #blueanon lawyers say it will be overturned in appeal.

But that's just one component of what I posted. Thankfully our SCOTUS is stopping the fascists we have in the West Wing right now.

Fitz I’m sure I will regret replying to one of Dax’s pudding brain talking points, but the reason he was tried in a #blueanon stronghold state is because that is where the crimes were committed. It really is that simple. If he would have committed these crimes in Wyoming, he would have been tried in Wyoming. (And then Dax would somehow pivot to calling Wyoming a #blueanon stronghold)

If Donald didn’t want to get tried in New York, then he shouldn’t have committed those crimes in New York

 

[cfbandyman]

Guys he's just happy that the court let him off of couping against the US. It' nbd, esp when the executive branch can't regulate anyways now. Not like anyone's railed against the crimes of presidents real or imagined ad nauseum. Just chill 

[sonofdaxjones]

We're just going to ignore all the things our guy is actually doing as we project on to our political enemies . . . what we're already doing.  (#blueanon)   

[Stupid Fitz]

We're just going to ignore all the things our guy is actually doing as we project on to our political enemies . . . what we're already doing.  (#blueanon)   

I guess I'm just one of those weird people that think all crimes should be looked in to and if you are convicted of crimes and have proven over the years to be a complete shitbag, you prob shouldn't get to be president, but again, I don't really follow politics. It's a real bummer of a situation we've gotten ourselves into.

[cfbandyman]

We're just going to ignore all the things our guy is actually doing as we project on to our political enemies . . . what we're already doing.  (#blueanon)   

I guess I'm just one of those weird people that think all crimes should be looked in to and if you are convicted of crimes and have proven over the years to be a complete shitbag, you prob shouldn't get to be president, but again, I don't really follow politics. It's a real bummer of a situation we've gotten ourselves into.

Weird, me too. But someone has to project that onto everyone else. But he can't ever admit to it cause he gets off on discourse. Probably stroking rn but he won't admit it, and about to type something to respond to this cause he literally can't help himself.

[Stupid Fitz]

As they always say, it's way easier to trick someone than it is to convince them that they were tricked.  Pretty sure that's directly from the bible.

[sonofdaxjones]

We're just going to ignore all the things our guy is actually doing as we project on to our political enemies . . . what we're already doing.  (#blueanon)   

I guess I'm just one of those weird people that think all crimes should be looked in to and if you are convicted of crimes and have proven over the years to be a complete shitbag, you prob shouldn't get to be president, but again, I don't really follow politics. It's a real bummer of a situation we've gotten ourselves into.

What I stated has nothing to do with looking into or not looking into crimes if they occur. Albeit Point 3 certainly engages the attempt to thwart criminal investigations by members of this administration.

The brainwashed derps keep projecting dictatorship on to Trump. I'll give you 3 examples of "blame your enemies for things that you're already doing"

1. SCOTUS just smacked the Biden Administration for misapplying criminal code to prosecute perceived political enemies

2. SCOTUS just smacked the Biden Administration and #blueanon bureaucrats for being censorious authoritarians

3. Our sitting SOS along with #blueanon leaning former intelligence agency officials used a massive disinformation campaign to help sway the outcome of the 2020 election and to attempt to stop the prosecution and investigation(s) into The Grifters Biden . . . this is classic authoritarian level disinformation

[Rage Against the McKee]

So I looked up this Project 2025 document and it's 922 pages long.

[CNS]

So I looked up this Project 2025 document and it's 922 pages long.

The president of the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank that has developed a prominent series of policy plans to overhaul the federal government under a Republican president, said on Tuesday that the country was “in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

The group’s president, Kevin D. Roberts, made the comments in an interview on “The War Room,” the Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon’s show on the network Real America’s Voice. (Mr. Bannon himself did not host the show on Tuesday, because he reported to prison the day before to serve a sentence for contempt of Congress.)

Mr. Roberts was discussing the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday that presidents have substantial immunity from prosecution for what they do in office, a ruling that upended the criminal case against former President Donald J. Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election and that removes a potential barrier to the most radical elements of his second-term agenda if he is elected again.

“We ought to be really encouraged by what happened yesterday, and in spite of all of the injustice — which of course friends and audience of this show, of our friend Steve, know — we are going to prevail,” Mr. Roberts said, alluding to Mr. Bannon’s imprisonment.

He went on to say that “the radical left” was “apoplectic” because “our side is winning” and said, “And so I come full circle in this response and just want to encourage you with some substance that we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/03/us/politics/heritage-foundation-2025-policy-america.html

[sys]

how racial identities function in america is how you know we're a christian nation.

*excluding Arab Christians

this is a high quality post.

[sonofdaxjones]

When you get the ol blow by from Joe as he heads straight to the white people.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Trim]

[star seed 7]

This is what Google lens points to

https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1620117/the-moment-she-realized-that-her-hero-doesn-t-like-black-people/

https://defiantamerica.com/video-smitten-black-girl-rejected-by-biden-who-instead-takes-selfies-with-old-angry-white-women-the-look-on-her-face-says-it-all/