Author Topic: USC  (Read 4125 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline theswo

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 482
  • Keep shooting, Gilbert
    • View Profile
USC
« on: June 09, 2010, 11:45:14 PM »
Two year postseason ban


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2010, 11:46:44 PM »
Wow. The Pac 16 West will be absolute dog crap for the next few years.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2010, 11:48:32 PM »
 :surprised:

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2010, 12:29:43 PM »
Talk about a slap on the wrist... that's freaking weak.
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2010, 12:40:35 PM »
 :lol:-Pete Carrol
 :lol:-Reggie Bush

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16044
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2010, 12:52:23 PM »
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline goldenticket

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 669
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2010, 01:17:47 PM »
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2010, 02:03:42 PM »
Don't make this seem light fellas.  They kicked their ass.  Vacate 04 BCS title, all 05 season, 75 scholly limit for next 3 years (loss of 30 scholarships), no post season for 2 years.

 :surprised:
« Last Edit: June 10, 2010, 02:06:54 PM by steve dave »

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2010, 02:10:16 PM »
Do we have schollys to give?  We need to scoop up some of these suddenly not on scholarship borderline talented USC castoffs!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2010, 02:12:08 PM »
Assuming they don't take away schollys from current players (they will) they would have 10 of their pretty ridic. recruiting class come available.

 :surprised:

Quote
BFeldmanESPN    #USC 2010 class also would need a release. They're bound to NLI. If they start summer school, that would trigger "transfer release."


Not that any of them will want to play ball in the MtnWest with us  :embarrassed:

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2010, 02:12:21 PM »
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Wow, if so, Hello resurgence of football at Washington. I would think they would run there since they were probably recruited by UW head coach while he was at USC.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2010, 02:14:03 PM »
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Wow, if so, Hello resurgence of football at Washington. I would think they would run there since they were probably recruited by UW head coach while he was at USC.

Doesn't sound like it

 :surprised:

Quote
BFeldmanESPN    That means if those players went to a different Pac-10 school, they could have to sit two years.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2010, 02:14:42 PM »
Maybe we could get some juniors and seniors to transfer here. They wouldn't even have to play in the Mtn. West because they'll be graduated by 2012.

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2010, 02:18:21 PM »
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Wow, if so, Hello resurgence of football at Washington. I would think they would run there since they were probably recruited by UW head coach while he was at USC.

Doesn't sound like it

 :surprised:

Quote
BFeldmanESPN    That means if those players went to a different Pac-10 school, they could have to sit two years.


 :surprised:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2010, 02:24:23 PM »
Bill has done well getting transfers.

Any USC kids that chose USC over OB?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2010, 02:26:05 PM »
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2010, 02:27:49 PM »
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2010, 02:28:41 PM »
Younger Old Bill destroyed them with lesser athletes before. He should show the possible transfers that and just thell them, "Imagine what we could do with your talent."

Offline Do Work Son

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 290
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #18 on: June 10, 2010, 02:30:19 PM »
Remember Marvin Simmons? USC transfer was a bust!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #19 on: June 10, 2010, 02:30:31 PM »
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

All the d00ds that would be transferring would be his d00ds!

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2010, 02:31:32 PM »
Yes OB and the gang could put together a presentation for the youngsters using newfangled technology like point power... power point?? Well, whatever it's called.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2010, 02:34:02 PM »
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

All the d00ds that would be transferring would be his d00ds!

Problem is we prolly couldn't afford them.  Won't they go to whoever the next highest bidder was?  :dunno:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2010, 02:34:48 PM »
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

All the d00ds that would be transferring would be his d00ds!

Problem is we prolly couldn't afford them.  Won't they go to whoever the next highest bidder was?  :dunno:

It's not like they have to give their under the table money back to USC. They've already been paid.

Offline MeatSauce

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1127
    • View Profile
Re: USC
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2010, 02:38:20 PM »
Could we trade a couple schollies per year for a  Pac10 invite? :dunno:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile