Poll

Regarding Iran: If Hillary "We came we saw he died" Clinton were President . . .

We would have been in a total war with Iran Months Ago
2 (40%)
She would have started bombing many targets in Iran days ago
0 (0%)
She would have started bombing limited targets in Iran days ago
2 (40%)
Real Book of Revelations Stuff by now
1 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 5

Voting closed: September 26, 2019, 11:28:01 AM

Author Topic: Regarding Iran: If Hillary "We came we saw he died" Clinton were President . . .  (Read 3241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Welp . . .


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
I think they would be following the nuclear agreement that we wouldn't have backed out of.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63776
  • good dog
    • View Profile
I think they would be following the nuclear agreement that we wouldn't have backed out of.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16698
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Not one of your better nicknames, friend
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6007
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
I think they would be following the nuclear agreement that we wouldn't have backed out of.

seems to be the most reasonable answer

but kudos to Dax for hitting his daily Hillary quota

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
A nuclear "agreement" that actually helped fund the weapon development programs of the type used to hit Saudi Arabia and only kicked the nuclear can down the road a few years.

Hell of a deal thanks to Barry.


Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Dax, at Burger King counter: God dammit I have to eat two Whoppers today because Obama.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Dax, at Burger King counter: God dammit I have to eat two Whoppers today because Obama.

Just think how fat he'd be with Hillary, though.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
LibBotFlection Factor:  11

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11637
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
A nuclear "agreement" that actually helped fund the weapon development programs of the type used to hit Saudi Arabia and only kicked the nuclear can down the road a few years.

Hell of a deal thanks to Barry.

Instead we get war even sooner! :Woot:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
A nuclear "agreement" that actually helped fund the weapon development programs of the type used to hit Saudi Arabia and only kicked the nuclear can down the road a few years.

Hell of a deal thanks to Barry.

Instead we get war even sooner! :Woot:

 :lol:  The Big Dummy clearly doesn't undestand that all the cash left on the tarmac is funding all of the Iranian backed terrorists in Syria, Iraq and Yemen who are conducting the proxy wars.

The unilateral (from a U.S. legislative perspective) nuclear "agreement" did nothing to stop any of that.   

LibBotFlection Factor: 12


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Yeah. I agree with dax that we probably should start bombing Iran. The country that was behind 9/11 is telling us to, after all.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Yeah. I agree with dax that we probably should start bombing Iran. The country that was behind 9/11 is telling us to, after all.

I believe the leadership of SA is agreeing with the increase in sanctions.  But nice effort.

A real pickle for LibBot Nation, lots of angst right now.




Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Well, whatever they tell us to do is what we should do, then. We don't want them to fly more planes at us.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Dax is going to feel like an absolute worm brain when trump signs back on with Iran

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Trump has already said he's willing to do new agreement anytime, Slow Dug.   Sans Tarmac Cash, though.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Well, whatever they tell us to do is what we should do, then. We don't want them to fly more planes at us.

 :curse: Rage's rage by the lack of bombing is palpable.   

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Really hoping Don can be the first, first term Pres since Clinton with zero net new wars.   Still got a ways go to, though.


Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6007
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Trump has already said he's willing to do new agreement anytime, Slow Dug.   Sans Tarmac Cash, though.

do we have any more of their assets to unfreeze?

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6007
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Really hoping Don can be the first, first term Pres since Clinton with zero net new wars.   Still got a ways go to, though.

what was Obama's new war?

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Trump has already said he's willing to do new agreement anytime, Slow Dug.   Sans Tarmac Cash, though.

So if he gives Iran any $$ as part of the new deal we will agree he got savagely dunked on.  Common ground, I like it

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63776
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Last I heard (before the refinery attack) trump was considering a 16 billion dollar payment/bailout as part of a new deal
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Last I heard (before the refinery attack) trump was considering a 16 billion dollar payment/bailout as part of a new deal

Price tag for doing absolutely nothing but taking Obama's name off.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63776
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Of course trump is also literally considering nuking Iran so take it for what it's worth
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
 :lol: Look at the LibBots who on one hand are lining up to defend a completely worthless nuclear "agreement" that gave Iran billions of dollars, now completely enraged about any possible new nuclear deal with Iran.

Just a shame that those Tarmac Billions attacked Saudi Arabia.