I know @chum is not capable of answering this question, because he just gurgles out whatever Elon Musk's evil Twitter machine tells him to say when it affirms his highly simple view of the world and his overly simplistic understanding of his political dogma.
So I'll ask at
@bucket, he's at least occasionally capable of putting together a cognizant sounding response.
@bucket, is it your position that someone like George Soro's, via various front organizations and NGO's can consistently be meddling into various government undertakings and business affairs at the Federal/State/Local/International level and that they are just some sort of benign humanitarian undertakings that no one is allowed to question? George Soro's for example made a vast portion of his wealth by betting against the fortunes (or misfortunes) of various sovereign nations around the globe. He's a classic monetary ghoul.
The modern day #blueanon usage of "conspiracy theory" to (allegedly and most often, poorly) refute various critical looks into the entities, movements and mechanisms that comprise #blueanon in all of its forms. Is a hybrid of Stasi like Zersetzung (decomposition) and the CIA (and other intelligence agencies) gaslighting. You're not really seeing/reading/hearing what you think you are, and if you tell anyone about it you're engaging in propagating conspiracy theories. Public declarations of conspiracy theory and conspiracy mongers by supposed authorities undermine or decompose the position of the accused. You know, like say 50 or so former intelligence officers (professional liars) attempting to make anyone who believed in Hunter Biden's laptop as being conspiracy theorists who were being duped by "classic Russian methods".
The Nazi's were masters at this, and it was a way to silence people (when it wasn't a good idea to just kill them) and to cover for things they, the Nazi's were actually doing. Russian (and East German) intelligence, particularly under Stalin were also masters of this as well.
