Author Topic: So immigration...  (Read 86387 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59491
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #775 on: July 16, 2025, 11:34:33 AM »
After we increase the ICE budget 20 fold, do we start deporting gang members or are we just going to grab 20 times more people from their immigration hearings while they're trying to continue living here legally?

You know the answer to that. 

We have had a militarized police force for decades now as well as a war on drugs.  Solving gang problems is hard.  Grabbing regular randos is super easy.  This administration doesn't have the ability to tackle hard things.

What you two should be asking is: Why did Pedo Pete fail to enforce our borders and our immigration laws?  Why did Pedo Pete allow so many more international criminal gangs to gain a bigger foothold in these United States?  You should ask why your political movement support: Cartels (with ties to foreign intelligence), human traffickers, sex traffickers.  You should ask why so many urban strongholds controlled by #blueanon for generations protect criminal illegal immigrants.

#blueanon: No one is above the law - unless we say they are


Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32509
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #776 on: July 16, 2025, 12:08:40 PM »
Obama was such a stud
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #777 on: July 16, 2025, 12:14:15 PM »
Dax, disappointment and disagreement with past actions doesn't keep you from addressing current issues.  You asked what changed, I say the methods is a big one.  Methods matter. 

Also, I would say intent.  Intent matters. 

Both methods and intent seem radical currently.  Agree?

I would also like to state that the argument against immigration has always been framed around jobs and benefits.  Yet, here we are with nearly record low unemployment and a $3-$5T increase in spending which completely takes the legs out of any of that old bullshit argument.  With that, what is left?  What is the why?  It seems obvious, which is why I come back to you doing a great job of looking like a coward without conviction or like Stephen Miller on this current issue and I ask you which you are or why that take is wrong?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59491
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #778 on: Today at 11:12:46 AM »
Dax, disappointment and disagreement with past actions doesn't keep you from addressing current issues.  You asked what changed, I say the methods is a big one.  Methods matter. 

Also, I would say intent.  Intent matters. 

Both methods and intent seem radical currently.  Agree?

I would also like to state that the argument against immigration has always been framed around jobs and benefits.  Yet, here we are with nearly record low unemployment and a $3-$5T increase in spending which completely takes the legs out of any of that old bullshit argument.  With that, what is left?  What is the why?  It seems obvious, which is why I come back to you doing a great job of looking like a coward without conviction or like Stephen Miller on this current issue and I ask you which you are or why that take is wrong?

You are fixating on some enforcement processes and totally avoiding the core question.  Once again viewers of this blog will note that a Dem POTUS made expedited removal the law of the land, and another Dem POTUS deported 5 million plus illegal immigrants while pounding the lectern talking about the . . . law of the land.

The leadership of your political movement was very anti illegal immigration for a very long time . . . what changed?

Why can't you answer that question? It's amazing  :lol: :lol:  It's not some old bullshit argument you colossal derp.   :lol:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59491
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #779 on: Today at 11:21:37 AM »
Just some old bullshit argument

To date, the City of Chicago has spent more than $612 million providing emergency shelter and other services.

https://www.nbcchicago.com/investigations/nbc-5-investigates-finds-hidden-details-on-cost-of-migrant-crisis-in-chicago/3637021/

Chicago Public Schools (CPS) is facing a significant budget shortfall for the upcoming fiscal year, estimated at $734 million. This has led to layoffs of over 1,400 staff members, including teachers and central office employees, as the district grapples with declining enrollment and increased costs. The district is also facing pressure to avoid further cuts and ensure the quality of education for students
« Last Edit: Today at 11:30:13 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #780 on: Today at 11:27:19 AM »
Coward or Stephen Miller?  I guess we will never know. 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59491
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #781 on: Today at 11:28:47 AM »
Coward or Stephen Miller?  I guess we will never know.

Utterly incapable of explaining why his political movement has done a complete 180 on immigration.

Absolutely onbrand in every way


Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40530
    • View Profile
Re: So immigration...
« Reply #782 on: Today at 12:58:18 PM »
Coward or Stephen Miller?  I guess we will never know.
Brother it's just an energy vampire, nothing more

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile