Why is dax so unhinged today?

[sonofdaxjones]

What is triggering StalkerBot.7 today:

1.  One #blueanon political and thought leader after another being compiled into a series of videos that are by every #blueanon definition - a clear and discernible attack against our democracy and the sanctity of our voting processes

Thus invoking an immediate deflectoconsgE response #onbrand

[Dugout DickStone]

China has been writing the maga script Re: Russia

[sonofdaxjones]

4.20.2023 (Enjoy the day hardcore cannabis users) 1:10 CST:

What is triggering #blueanongE and dug today:

1. Xi stiff arming his boy Joe
2. Being reminded that #blueanongE is a go to conservative/MAGA news aggregator

[DaBigTrain]

Day 2 of his meltdown of one of his heros being canned.

[sonofdaxjones]

4/25/2023 - What is making #blueanongE happy and triggered today

Happy:  Day 2 of the Tucker got canned circle bukkake continues

Triggered:  Knowing that their party is probably going to nominate an old white racist war mongering sexual predator grifter (again) to run for President

DuhBigTrain -I'm just here to talk stalk dax

[NickVickandThick]

Day 2 of his meltdown of one of his heros being canned.

He's on a real tear and totally not the one melting down.

[sonofdaxjones]

This is interesting take from someone who immediately went on a 4 or 5 post tear about Don Trump in the Biden thread.

It's also super weird that #blueanongE continues to be triggered by someone posting in a forum that's all about . . . posting.

[Dugout DickStone]

No one will instruct him which side to take in tucker v fox

[sonofdaxjones]

Is Tucker suing Fox or vice-versa?

Interesting if true

[Dugout DickStone]

who said there was a suit? 

If there is one it won't be filed less than 24 hours he gets termed.  If you have any other legal questions post itt, I will help you understand

[sonofdaxjones]

who said there was a suit? 

If there is one it won't be filed less than 24 hours he gets termed.  If you have any other legal questions post itt, I will help you understand

You used the words Tucker v Fox

[Dugout DickStone]

The "v" can mean versus in many contexts.  If it were actually a lawsuit, it would have the proper full party names (not a first name only) and a case number.

Any more questions about the very most basics of our civil litigation system, hmu!

[sonofdaxjones]

The "v" can mean versus in many contexts.  If it were actually a lawsuit, it would have the proper full party names (not a first name only) and a case number.

Any more questions about the very most basics of our civil litigation system, hmu!

Oh okay 

[Dugout DickStone]

The "v" can mean versus in many contexts.  If it were actually a lawsuit, it would have the proper full party names (not a first name only) and a case number.

Any more questions about the very most basics of our civil litigation system, hmu!

Oh okay 

4/25/23 @ 1:49 - he doesn't know crap about the civil court system

[sonofdaxjones]

The "v" can mean versus in many contexts.  If it were actually a lawsuit, it would have the proper full party names (not a first name only) and a case number.

Any more questions about the very most basics of our civil litigation system, hmu!

Oh okay 

4/25/23 @ 1:49 - he doesn't know crap about the civil court system

That is incorrect, and can you cite any specific examples where you used full party names and the specific case number on this blog?

It's great when you nerd out like this.   

[star seed 7]

The "v" can mean versus in many contexts.  If it were actually a lawsuit, it would have the proper full party names (not a first name only) and a case number.

Any more questions about the very most basics of our civil litigation system, hmu!

Oh okay 

4/25/23 @ 1:49 - he doesn't know crap about the civil court system

I'm not sure if you've noticed but dax routinely shows his ass when he tries to dabble in law

[sonofdaxjones]

The "v" can mean versus in many contexts.  If it were actually a lawsuit, it would have the proper full party names (not a first name only) and a case number.

Any more questions about the very most basics of our civil litigation system, hmu!

Oh okay 

4/25/23 @ 1:49 - he doesn't know crap about the civil court system

I'm not sure if you've noticed but dax routinely shows his ass when he tries to dabble in law

Love it when adorablesgE team up and try to give me the ol one - two

[Dugout DickStone]

geez dude, you are absolutely going through it.

  more

[sonofdaxjones]

Accepted

[NickVickandThick]

geez dude, you are absolutely going through it.

  more

I hope he realizes how humorous his posts are to everyone else. 

[sonofdaxjones]

geez dude, you are absolutely going through it.

  more

[Dugout DickStone]

He gets all shook up about not knowing crap about the law but it's not like everyone else does.  Nothing to get low self esteem about

[sonofdaxjones]

Yep, nobody uses  name v  name very uncommon.

Takes deep understanding of the law to get that   

Still waiting on the very specific examples of dug using the very specific full name(s) and case numbers on this blog

Meanwhile number one(s) on the Google rando search machine headings, no full names until you click on the link, no case numbers until you click on the link.  Very detailed stuff here, very very complex

Trump v. Hawaii
Clinton v. Jones
Clinton v City of New York
Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network

[DaBigTrain]

GOING ALL IN 

[sonofdaxjones]