Author Topic: Surveilance State  (Read 168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4083
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Surveilance State
« on: May 14, 2020, 01:45:47 PM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6398
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2020, 02:42:32 PM »
Don't be a dumbass.  That got voted down, but it WAS voted "on".

https://gizmodo.com/heres-who-just-voted-to-let-the-f-b-i-seize-your-searc-1843445032

Congrats on being a "headline victim".  It lost by one vote.

bears are fast...

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 31384
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2020, 03:12:21 PM »
Don't be a dumbass.  That got voted down, but it WAS voted "on".

https://gizmodo.com/heres-who-just-voted-to-let-the-f-b-i-seize-your-searc-1843445032

Congrats on being a "headline victim".  It lost by one vote.

Quote
A bipartisan amendment that would have prohibited law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI, from obtaining the web browsing and internet search histories of Americans without a warrant failed to pass in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday by a single vote.

Sometimes it helps to read.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 32806
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2020, 03:14:01 PM »
Lick is just enraged by the fact that his guy rode around during his campaign and promised to correct all the abuses of the evil Bush-Cheney era and then once in office did the exact opposite.

The great thing for Obama, is that outside a very extreme edge of the constituency and media, he got do it with little to no questioning.

I was reminded today that in 2015 the UN was about to list the United States as having the highest incarceration rate (and incarcerated population) of children on the planet.   But Barry and his "spy" UN Ambassador got that report . . . muted.





Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4083
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2020, 03:26:07 PM »
what if we just agree that we both wish more would have been done to fix the surveillance state under Obama and live in the present...

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4083
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2020, 03:27:38 PM »
the present where Pubs are driving the train to not only re-authorize but expand those powers.

yet here we sit with nary a criticism but a shitload of Obama whatabouts

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4083
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2020, 03:28:59 PM »
addtitionally the same crap brains that voted these guys in are all like "contract tracing??? I don't want big gubment spying on me..."

quite the pickle

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5811
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2020, 03:30:13 PM »
what if we just agree that we both wish more would have been done to fix the surveillance state under Obama and live in the present...

That's not possible.  This is a hard coded programming feature of the Daxbot.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 32806
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2020, 04:00:40 PM »
what if we just agree that we both wish more would have been done to fix the surveillance state under Obama and live in the present...


You need to start under the premise that NOTHING was done to "fix" the surveillance state under Obama and that it was used and abused repeatedly to the point that it was directed REPEATEDLY at political opposition and political enemies.

When you finally admit to that in this blog, we'll have further discussions.






Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5811
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2020, 04:01:54 PM »
 :lol:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 31384
    • View Profile
Re: Surveilance State
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2020, 04:12:57 PM »
what if we just agree that we both wish more would have been done to fix the surveillance state under Obama and live in the present...


You need to start under the premise that NOTHING was done to "fix" the surveillance state under Obama and that it was used and abused repeatedly to the point that it was directed REPEATEDLY at political opposition and political enemies.

When you finally admit to that in this blog, we'll have further discussions.

It seems like the extreme FISA abuse that Trump supposedly suffered would lead republicans to want to weaken certain aspects of FISA, no? This vote was pretty much a pat on the back and a "good job" from the republicans to Obama.