Good pick. Not as exciting for me as Barrett but oh well. She’ll replace Ruth next year.
Oh and holy crap, Spracne- talk about the very definition of word salad!
I actually read through the entirety of your tortured, flawed analysis and I’m not going to respond point by point because I think we’d all re-read Atlas Shrugged first. But cliffs notes version: the vast majority of your bloviation is a completely irrelevant distraction. The constitution does not speak to abortion, period. You don’t need to define when life begins to reach that obvious conclusion. As for the equal protection clause, your argument that a law banning abortion violates equal protection because only women can get pregnant is an absurdity. The analysis is not whether the law applies exclusively to women (which isn’t even the case, as anti-abortion laws apply to everyone, including any man who attempts to provide or procure one), but whether the inability to obtain an abortion make women unequal to men. Such a position is questionable at best.
In short, you’re all wet, but I’m not interested in debating this further with you. At a later time I will head over to the abortion thread to dig out a few other Spracne gems of stupidity, but for now it’s back to the celebration.
Happy Trumpmas everybody! Another fine pick!