Lib twitter is all sorts of mad about Bloomberg. Makes me think Bloomy may be alright. Which is something considering Bloomy’s work to date trying to convince me he isn’t. Quite the pickle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you read that twitter string and are cool with that infiltrating our political system, I'm perfectly cool with you being on the dax side of the issue. That didn't even mention that he has one of the largest news media companies in the country and instructed them not to cover him critically.
I think it’s bad that it is a part of our political system, kind of like how I think that the Belicheck/Vrabel trick to do delay of game-false start-delay of game to milk more time off the clock is bad. It is bad, but within the rules, so if you have the means to do it and decide not to, you aren’t playing to win.
I appreciate that Bloomberg is seemingly playing to win.
It's a really poor comparison. Vrabel is taking advantage of a loophole in the rules, that they have little to no power to change. Bloomberg, Trump, et al, are using their money to continue to keep a thumb on the scale to protect the status quo. If Bloomberg came out and said, "I'm doing this to ensure that another American can never ever buy an election again," then vowed his remaining billions to ending poverty, then I'd be all for this.