I obviously liked Gabbard, but also prob judge what she says in these things more harshly than others.
Tonight I thought:
Biden - managed vs the attacks decently, was kinda meh overall. Still top dog, getting less cool in these debates
Yang - pretty decent, seems smart and knows how to talk
Trim’s Gov Jay - weird voice and mouth, but actually pretty great and good debater. I wish he was cooler, he might win if so
Booker - seemed composed and unifying, handled spats well, good energy
Harris - crappy instigator and seems like a jerk, talked over time always
Blonde lady - seemed good sometimes, I didn’t like her and a few other trying to play moderator
Bill De Blasio (sp?) - male version of Harris, not a fan
Colorado guy, Bennett?? - weird voice, also seems smart, not cool enough to win
I was hoping Gabbard would tie playing for all of the crap she wants (and most others want) back to ending expensive war actions earlier, but she did it decent at the end. She didn’t mention Iran much, but that is another one that is going to cost tons of cash while making big arms rich.