Author Topic: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)  (Read 139600 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1725 on: February 05, 2019, 10:56:58 AM »
we should raise TF out of the gas taxes. And this is coming from someone who irl puts 50k miles a year on two vehicles (and has several dozen kids)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Is this 50k per vehicle, or total?  Consider yourself under bbs oath


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19735
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1726 on: February 05, 2019, 11:22:02 AM »
I took it as 25k per vehicle FWIW

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1727 on: February 05, 2019, 11:26:29 AM »
I noticed virtually no change from last year to this year.

I thought one side said trump saved the middle class and the other side said trump would screw the middle class?

Second biggest lie in this thread, just behind SD and his stable of lies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judging from the responses here, it clearly benefited the rich.

:gocho:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1728 on: February 05, 2019, 11:27:13 AM »
we should raise TF out of the gas taxes. And this is coming from someone who irl puts 50k miles a year on two vehicles (and has several dozen kids)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Is this 50k per vehicle, or total?  Consider yourself under bbs oath


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Total. And it’s irl.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1729 on: February 05, 2019, 11:29:29 AM »
So you’re telling me that Mrs Dave and your brood are sitting in the car for an average 69 miles per day everyday, while you’re in car #2 also cruising an average of 69 miles per day, AND posting 300 times per day on gE?

SHITS NOT ADDING UP


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1730 on: February 05, 2019, 11:31:02 AM »
I believe sd
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1731 on: February 05, 2019, 11:31:55 AM »
He’s already lied twice (TWICE!) in this thread.

It’s time that gE finally puts SD in his place


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19735
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1732 on: February 05, 2019, 11:36:45 AM »
I think a major point of contention is the definition of "middle class"

I would put middle class as family of 4 earning 100-200k per year, and that's really only thinking in the KC area because that's where I live.

Thoughts?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1733 on: February 05, 2019, 11:44:39 AM »
Median household income in the US is like $50k
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1734 on: February 05, 2019, 11:45:57 AM »
Median household income in the US is like $50k
More like $60k
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1735 on: February 05, 2019, 11:47:17 AM »
I think a major point of contention is the definition of "middle class"

I would put middle class as family of 4 earning 100-200k per year, and that's really only thinking in the KC area because that's where I live.

Thoughts?

This is a little old, but no...
:adios:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1736 on: February 05, 2019, 11:49:37 AM »
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1737 on: February 05, 2019, 11:50:41 AM »
I would put middle class as family of 4 earning 100-200k per year

you, cire, are out of touch

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1738 on: February 05, 2019, 12:06:43 PM »
So you’re telling me that Mrs Dave and your brood are sitting in the car for an average 69 miles per day everyday, while you’re in car #2 also cruising an average of 69 miles per day, AND posting 300 times per day on gE?

SHITS NOT ADDING UP


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yes, not equally though.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1739 on: February 05, 2019, 12:10:24 PM »
I think a major point of contention is the definition of "middle class"

I would put middle class as family of 4 earning 100-200k per year, and that's really only thinking in the KC area because that's where I live.

Thoughts?

middle class is a very wide band. and then if you throw in lower-middle and upper-middle you get even wider. iirc upper-middle goes up to like $350k and lower-middle as low as like $30k. and then if you define it by specific area (like what percentile for your city) you can make it a moving target.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1740 on: February 05, 2019, 01:09:27 PM »
If you use dumb definitions of middle class like that, the term is completely meaningless
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1741 on: February 05, 2019, 01:11:06 PM »
“I’m just an every day normal average middle class family, who happenings to be in the 95th percentile for income”
:adios:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1742 on: February 05, 2019, 01:15:01 PM »
The 95th percentile has a closer lifestyle to the 50th than the 99th. That makes the middle class hard to define.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1743 on: February 05, 2019, 01:15:47 PM »
“I’m just an every day normal average middle class family, who happenings to be in the 95th percentile for income”

I think upper middle class goes to around the 98th percent

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1744 on: February 05, 2019, 01:18:57 PM »
The 95th percentile has a closer lifestyle to the 50th than the 99th. That makes the middle class hard to define.

yes, and the fact that the top 0.1% makes such an extraordinarily greater income than even the 0.5% let alone the 1% makes the ranges look silly. You could break down the top 1% into about 5 different ranges in itself. and then you have to consider that this is measuring income and not wealth.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1745 on: February 05, 2019, 01:20:10 PM »
Then it’s a completely meaningless classification. I don’t know why people are so loath to admit that they are :kstategrad:
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1746 on: February 05, 2019, 01:21:44 PM »
It’s like a 6’8” guy claiming to be of slightly above average height
:adios:

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1747 on: February 05, 2019, 01:28:25 PM »
My lifestyle is wildly different from someone who makes $50k in the Bay Area. But I definitely do more cool crap than the 99th percentile. so :dunno:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1748 on: February 05, 2019, 01:31:00 PM »
It’s like a 6’8” guy claiming to be of slightly above average height

disclaimer: I AGREE WITH YOU

but your analogy would only be applicable if 1% of the population was like 40 feet tall

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19735
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1749 on: February 05, 2019, 01:33:23 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class_in_the_United_States

Middle class (plurality/
majority?; ca. 46%)   College-educated workers with considerably higher-than-average incomes and compensation; a man making $57,000 and a woman making $40,000 may be typical.