To be fair, the Pulse shooter said himself he was doing it for ISIS. Here we only have ISIS taking credit at this point.
MIR isn't interested in "being fair." He's only got one note, and it's raaaacism.
I'd be interested in you telling us how you were able to determine his motivation five hours after the siege was over, yet it took government officials three weeks to publicly do the same. You only had his name, Omar Mateen, and nothing else. Tell us all how you cracked the code without using race as the sole tool.
MIR: "It you were quick to conclude that a young guy named Omar Mateen shooting up a gay nightclub was probably a terrorist act, but you're not so sure of an old guy named Stephen Paddock opening fire on a country music concert was a terrorist act, you're a total hypocrite and racist."
Me: "Ok, I'll just stick to my common sense, and I'll likely be right, and you just go ahead and call me a racist."
Maybe some manifesto will emerge and this really will be an act of terrorism. Too soon to tell. But my judgment now is perfectly sensible, as was my judgment of the Pulse shooting.