Author Topic: LOL DEMOCRATS  (Read 31352 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #725 on: December 30, 2022, 05:22:27 PM »
This is going to be a very interesting case.  He gave money to everyone.  Not just politicians, but media too.  However, $8B is so much, everyone knows something has to happen. 

At some point, something has to happen.

Or else what?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64050
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #728 on: January 15, 2023, 12:04:20 PM »
T's&p's straight people
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #729 on: January 15, 2023, 12:10:39 PM »
T's&p's straight people

We had a nice run tbh

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6538
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #730 on: January 15, 2023, 02:29:39 PM »
T's&p's straight people

We had a nice run tbh

Death, taxes, and getting cancelled by the woke left.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #732 on: January 18, 2023, 01:40:39 PM »
What is sarcasm?

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21466
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #734 on: January 18, 2023, 02:31:17 PM »
LOL at Wacky getting trolled.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12817
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Hot time in Kat town tonight.


Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15225
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #738 on: January 20, 2023, 12:11:24 AM »

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #739 on: January 20, 2023, 12:14:08 AM »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #740 on: January 20, 2023, 06:43:00 AM »
crazy use of the money when you think that that's almost enough to build a public bathroom.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #741 on: January 20, 2023, 06:57:38 AM »
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-each-longtime-black-resident-total-debt-forgiveness.amp

Show proof of residency for 13 years in one of the most expensive real estate markets in the world and we'll give you $5 million.
Are you implying that the black community in San Francisco is already pretty well-off?

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #742 on: January 20, 2023, 06:57:44 AM »
crazy use of the money when you think that that's almost enough to build a public bathroom.
This is a good joke

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6538
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #743 on: January 20, 2023, 07:27:08 AM »
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-each-longtime-black-resident-total-debt-forgiveness.amp

Show proof of residency for 13 years in one of the most expensive real estate markets in the world and we'll give you $5 million.
Are you implying that the black community in San Francisco is already pretty well-off?
I interpreted it as OP (renown for not reading past the headlines) was insinuating the proposal amounted to “hey are you black and living in SF? Come on down and get $5MM for being a black person living in SF!” To which catastrophe was rebuking that position, suggesting the criteria to qualify was a pretty high bar to clear and to assure ol’ wackster not to worry, they won’t be cutting $5MM checks to any and every black person who can make their way on down to city hall.

Just my interpretation, tho

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #744 on: January 20, 2023, 08:39:16 AM »
You’re a known Dumbass, so this makes sense.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #745 on: January 20, 2023, 08:45:03 AM »
$5 million seems a bit over the top and absurd to me, especially considering that homeless people don't have any way to prove 13 years of residency. But I also don't live anywhere near SF and don't really care how they choose to spend their money.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #746 on: January 20, 2023, 08:48:48 AM »
That city is awesome and disgusting all in one. They should focus that $ on homeless shelters and cleaning up people who walk past you on the street, with crap in their pants, mumped up out of their mind. That’s what left leadership gets you tho!

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64050
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #747 on: January 20, 2023, 08:54:39 AM »
To my knowledge this committee has no government affiliation, it's a citizens group.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #748 on: January 20, 2023, 09:06:09 AM »
Talk about some dumb white lib guilt. Show me your skin color and we’ll cut you a check! eff vets tho! We need to take care of the druggies first! Sounds racist AF!

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15225
    • View Profile
Re: LOL DEMOCRATS
« Reply #749 on: January 20, 2023, 09:10:04 AM »
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-each-longtime-black-resident-total-debt-forgiveness.amp

Show proof of residency for 13 years in one of the most expensive real estate markets in the world and we'll give you $5 million.
Are you implying that the black community in San Francisco is already pretty well-off?
I interpreted it as OP (renown for not reading past the headlines) was insinuating the proposal amounted to “hey are you black and living in SF? Come on down and get $5MM for being a black person living in SF!” To which catastrophe was rebuking that position, suggesting the criteria to qualify was a pretty high bar to clear and to assure ol’ wackster not to worry, they won’t be cutting $5MM checks to any and every black person who can make their way on down to city hall.

Just my interpretation, tho

My point is pretty much inbetween. The "proposal" is pure virtue signaling. Assuming the article is fairly representing everything, the reparations are explicitly not intended to be based on financial need--or even for harm imposed by SF or California. Instead, they're supposed to compensate for institutional racism. So whether the black community in SF is or isn't well off is irrelevant. Although I do expect that a lot of the theoretical recipients of these reparations likely already do have at least $5 million in the bank.

Where I disagree with wacky is acting like this proposal is actually expected to go anywhere. It seems clearly just intended to make a point.