Another Trump scandal inbound?

[ednksu]

Trump business/ foreign corrupt practices scandal master thread?


http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/13/donald-trumps-worst-deal
Trump is in bed with the Russians and working with people who also work for Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

[LickNeckey]

[Institutional Control]

Fake news!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Fake news!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i.e., Rachel Maddow

Had now idea rachel still had her show. Kudos to rachel.

[ednksu]

Nice ad hom FSD.  No need to look at all the facts, video evidence, and documents when you can just trash someone because they're "liberal."  Not like Trump is helping out terrorist nations. 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Nice ad hom FSD.  No need to look at all the facts, video evidence, and documents when you can just trash someone because they're "liberal."  Not like Trump is helping out terrorist nations. 

Interesting take:

Stop posting crap from zero hedge and calling it an "article." It's mindless bullshit drivel.

Also, there's nothing you can say or do that could compel me to watch one second of whack-a-doodle maddow.

[ednksu]

Nice ad hom FSD.  No need to look at all the facts, video evidence, and documents when you can just trash someone because they're "liberal."  Not like Trump is helping out terrorist nations. 

Interesting take:

Stop posting crap from zero hedge and calling it an "article." It's mindless bullshit drivel.

Also, there's nothing you can say or do that could compel me to watch one second of whack-a-doodle maddow.

I understand.  Maddow does use a lot of big confusing words.  It's tough for you guys who don't have the best words.


Also noting someone has a crap source that is known to be unreliable isn't an ad hom attack.  But that's another big word with a tough concept for a definition.

[sonofdaxjones]

Pretty sad, sorry state of affairs if you're relying on the words of a person who was openly weeping, on air, after Hillary was about to lose the election.

Sourcing: Denied

[wetwillie]

Don't do it Dax. Think how much better your life was not pitting.

[sonofdaxjones]

I'm being selective.   But couldn't allow whackadoo to throw any old whackadoo "source" out there and run with it.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Nice ad hom FSD.  No need to look at all the facts, video evidence, and documents when you can just trash someone because they're "liberal."  Not like Trump is helping out terrorist nations. 

Interesting take:

Stop posting crap from zero hedge and calling it an "article." It's mindless bullshit drivel.

Also, there's nothing you can say or do that could compel me to watch one second of whack-a-doodle maddow.

I understand.  Maddow does use a lot of big confusing words.  It's tough for you guys who don't have the best words.


Also noting someone has a crap source that is known to be unreliable isn't an ad hom attack.  But that's another big word with a tough concept for a definition.

Does a double ad hom beat a single ad hom, harry

 

[SdK]

You are all silly

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T377A using Tapatalk

[ednksu]

I'm being selective.   But couldn't allow whackadoo to throw any old whackadoo "source" out there and run with it.

Interesting that you find real journalists "whackadoos" when her fears are literally coming true everyday.  But hey, you don't have to believe her, you can also look at the great piece from the New Yorker, the video evidence, the wikileaks sources, and a bunch of other stuff from journalists.

[sonofdaxjones]

Okay there whackadoo, I will. So far, not really close to giving Iran a couple of billion dollars in ransom money straight out, but you never know.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sonofdaxjones]

It also seems quite partisan and more than a little hilarious in timing.  Given the fact that you constantly pooh poohed away all discussion of the Clinton Foundations and the Clinton's direct dealings with a multitude of extremely corrupt people.

It also appears to be entirely circumstantial at this time. 

It also seems a little weird that you're suddenly so concerned with private citizens are providing what are at best tertiary licensing agreements with possible front organizations.  That may not even have been fully aware of.

When we know then Pres Clinton, the Sen Clinton and then SOS Clinton and then Candidate Clinton have a 3 decade history of both direct and indirect dealings and received campaign contributions from a multitude of front organizations that are quite well known, including those owned wholly by the Chinese Military, not to mention the Russian uranium deal. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SdK]

I had better hopes for this

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T377A using Tapatalk

[ednksu]

It also seems quite partisan and more than a little hilarious in timing.  Given the fact that you constantly pooh poohed away all discussion of the Clinton Foundations and the Clinton's direct dealings with a multitude of extremely corrupt people.

It also appears to be entirely circumstantial at this time. 

It also seems a little weird that you're suddenly so concerned with private citizens are providing what are at best tertiary licensing agreements with possible front organizations.  That may not even have been fully aware of.

When we know then Pres Clinton, the Sen Clinton and then SOS Clinton and then Candidate Clinton have a 3 decade history of both direct and indirect dealings and received campaign contributions from a multitude of front organizations that are quite well known, including those owned wholly by the Chinese Military, not to mention the Russian uranium deal. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm shocked that you've totally missed the issue and are now deflecting to Clinton. 

In the US, where we have laws, once a country is designated as a terrorist supporter, and once peoples and or groups are designated as prohibited, you can't do business with the people they do business with.  Spending millions of dollars building a building out in the middle of nowhere, with said corrupt agents is still illegal.  Note where Maddow gave factual evidence of dealings and analogous situations. 
I'm sorry you don't have the capability to see beyond your blind hate of the Clintons to see that.


Also you're still rough ridin' wrong about the uranium deal and any credible source would correct your zerohedge knowledge base on that.

[sonofdaxjones]

I'm not wrong on the Uranium deal and the CF and the Clinton's collectively pocketed in the 7 figures as result of that deal.  I see, Zero Hedge is now your LOL go to.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

The mere fact that the usual suspects had to come back and "set us all straight" multiple times after the fact, tells us all we need to know.   It's amazing the theatrics and grandiose leaps in logic that Libs go through in order to try and explain and re-explain the actions of their heroes, but I digress. 

This so called " Iranian deal" that Trumps made doesn't quite meet the $2 billion in ransom to the Iranian government, litmus test.

When there's some there, there.  Holler


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LickNeckey]

Pretty sad, sorry state of affairs if you're relying on the words of a person who was openly weeping, on air, after Hillary was about to lose the election.

Sourcing: Denied

welcome back friend   

[Emo EMAW]

Guys, they have turned us against each other when it's them we should really be pissed at. 

[ednksu]

I'm not wrong on the Uranium deal and the CF and the Clinton's collectively pocketed in the 7 figures as result of that deal.  I see, Zero Hedge is now your LOL go to.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

The mere fact that the usual suspects had to come back and "set us all straight" multiple times after the fact, tells us all we need to know.   It's amazing the theatrics and grandiose leaps in logic that Libs go through in order to try and explain and re-explain the actions of their heroes, but I digress. 

This so called " Iranian deal" that Trumps made doesn't quite meet the $2 billion in ransom to the Iranian government, litmus test.

When there's some there, there.  Holler


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Basics dude....just basics.
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/


But yeah, a deal where Trump is plainly dealing with corrupt officials, a clear violation of federal law is too much of a leap.  But Hillary funneling money to herself and foundation, before she was Sec State, knowing she would lose in '08 and get the job, getting 11 different agencies or departments to approve a sale of a Canadian company to a Russian company is iron clad proof of pay for play.

[SdK]

Guys, they have turned us against each other when it's them we should really be pissed at.

Yes

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I'm being selective.   But couldn't allow whackadoo to throw any old whackadoo "source" out there and run with it.

Interesting that you find real journalists "whackadoos" when her fears are literally coming true everyday.  But hey, you don't have to believe her, you can also look at the great piece from the New Yorker, the video evidence, the wikileaks sources, and a bunch of other stuff from journalists.

Maddow is a whackadoo and the New Yorker is a leftist [shitty] magazine.

If somebody called Sean Hannity a journalist "whose fears about the obama admin all came true", you'd ridicule them.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

This maddow scandal is really taking off! Just like her and olberman's bush and the cia were behind 9/11 scandal. I wonder what their fellow psuedo-journalist michael moore is up to?

[ednksu]

I'm being selective.   But couldn't allow whackadoo to throw any old whackadoo "source" out there and run with it.

Interesting that you find real journalists "whackadoos" when her fears are literally coming true everyday.  But hey, you don't have to believe her, you can also look at the great piece from the New Yorker, the video evidence, the wikileaks sources, and a bunch of other stuff from journalists.

Maddow is a whackadoo and the New Yorker is a leftist [shitty] magazine.

If somebody called Sean Hannity a journalist "whose fears about the obama admin all came true", you'd ridicule them.

The sad thing is I know you're being serious.