Author Topic: oscar's contract (Read 5298 times)

CHONGS · « **Reply #25 on:** February 02, 2017, 03:04:00 PM »

This is the best ksu bball team in three years. Clear progress each of the last three years.

DQ12 · « **Reply #26 on:** February 02, 2017, 04:34:36 PM »

why did we keep extending him? who did we think was going to poach him?

Trim · « **Reply #27 on:** February 02, 2017, 04:45:39 PM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on February 02, 2017, 04:34:36 PM

why did we keep extending him? who did we think was going to poach him?

I got 3 words for ya.

Pett · « **Reply #28 on:** February 02, 2017, 04:58:05 PM »

Quote from: sys on February 02, 2017, 12:57:40 PM

Quote from: SdK on February 02, 2017, 12:46:26 PM
Why not sys?

i can't take five more years of waiting and seeing. i know where i stand with our current regime and i have fun watching their games.

You are a natural born loser

#LIFE · « **Reply #29 on:** February 02, 2017, 05:34:45 PM »

How much has oscar earned per conference win compared to what ku is going to pay beatty?

sys · « **Reply #30 on:** February 02, 2017, 05:36:44 PM »

Quote from: Pett on February 02, 2017, 04:58:05 PM

You are a natural born loser

change for change's sake doesn't make any sense, pett.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #31 on:** February 02, 2017, 05:38:39 PM »

oscar is at $240-250K per conference win if we lose out.

sys · « **Reply #32 on:** February 02, 2017, 05:44:48 PM »

we aren't going to lose out, for eff's sake. we might be able to work a pay cut into an extension. weber is of an age where i imagine he values stability.

SdK · « **Reply #33 on:** February 02, 2017, 07:23:23 PM »

Get it together, sys.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #34 on:** February 02, 2017, 10:26:39 PM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on February 02, 2017, 04:34:36 PM

why did we keep extending him? who did we think was going to poach him?

What do you mean "keep?" The last time he was extended he had two years left, I'm sure you've heard a million times about the perils of recruiting on a one or two year deal. If oscar didn't get extended we almost certainly wouldn't have any of the freshmen and sophomores on this team that people enjoy watching.

Sorry for not following the hive and not making some joke about Currie

Trim · « **Reply #35 on:** February 02, 2017, 10:37:35 PM »

Each of his 2 extensions happened after 1 year of the 5 he had on his then-deal. Barring an in-season extension, this off-season will be the first time he's only had 2 years remaining.

Section 3.01(a) in each.

Quote from: Trim on February 02, 2017, 12:35:17 PM

http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kcur/files/Bruce_Weber_Contract.pdf

https://ksu-platform-secure-prod.silverchalice.co/v3/files/5583c3abe4b06b726e65b9bd

https://ksu-platform-secure-prod.silverchalice.co/v3/files/5583b6cee4b06b726e655681

MakeItRain · « **Reply #36 on:** February 03, 2017, 03:24:08 AM »

Thanks. In not reading those though. Next time I have a contract question I'll defer to you.

Look edn, that isn't hard to do.

ednksu · « **Reply #37 on:** February 03, 2017, 05:09:13 AM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 03, 2017, 03:24:08 AM

Thanks. In not reading those though. Next time I have a contract question I'll defer to you.

Look edn, that isn't hard to do.

crazy how you like some links and not others.

Trim · « **Reply #38 on:** February 03, 2017, 10:42:14 AM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 03, 2017, 03:24:08 AM

Thanks. In not reading those though. Next time I have a contract question I'll defer to you.

It does mean though that if not in-season, this summer we have to LOCK HIM UP. It's one thing to have a vocal minority of fans calling for his head. We can't have mid-majors across america negatively recruiting by claiming he's on the "hot seat" w/only 2 years left on his deal.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #39 on:** February 03, 2017, 10:47:41 AM »

I could totes see Currie trying to get oscar to push the midmajor eject button instead of firing him.

delerioustyme · « **Reply #40 on:** February 03, 2017, 11:53:37 AM »

Quote from: Trim on February 03, 2017, 10:42:14 AM

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 03, 2017, 03:24:08 AM
Thanks. In not reading those though. Next time I have a contract question I'll defer to you.

It does mean though that if not in-season, this summer we have to LOCK HIM UP. It's one thing to have a vocal minority of fans calling for his head. We can't have mid-majors across america negatively recruiting by claiming he's on the "hot seat" w/only 2 years left on his deal.

Wha? I'm not even gonna waste my time arguing this. Look at it this way, 2 years of not making the tournament or pony up and get a new coach.

Damn! He trippin' so hard fans are gonna think he done fell off!

sys · « **Reply #41 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:15:48 PM »

what if we could renegotiate the deal so that we're paying him an adjustable amount based on totals wins, though? something like a 100k per win base, with a 100k per win bonus for all wins over 15 would probably be fair for both weber and the fans.

Trim · « **Reply #42 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:20:32 PM »

Quote from: sys on February 03, 2017, 01:15:48 PM

what if we could renegotiate the deal so that we're paying him an adjustable amount based on totals wins, though? something like a 100k per win base, with a 100k per win bonus for all wins over 15 would probably be fair for both weber and the fans.

Can you even imagine what the non-con schedule would look like in that scenario, barring interference from a rogue schedulemaker?

Cire · « **Reply #43 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:28:59 PM »

Would oscar take a lateral move to mizzou?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kso_FAN · « **Reply #44 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:33:53 PM »

How about this:
200K for top 25 wins.
150K for wins vs 26-50.
100K for wins vs 51-100.
75K for wins 101-200.
50K for wins 200+.

hatingfrancisco · « **Reply #45 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:35:49 PM »

Quote from: Trim on February 03, 2017, 10:42:14 AM

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 03, 2017, 03:24:08 AM
Thanks. In not reading those though. Next time I have a contract question I'll defer to you.

It does mean though that if not in-season, this summer we have to LOCK HIM UP. It's one thing to have a vocal minority of fans calling for his head. We can't have mid-majors across america negatively recruiting by claiming he's on the "hot seat" w/only 2 years left on his deal.

Finally, someone get's it.

sys · « **Reply #46 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:37:58 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FWN on February 03, 2017, 01:33:53 PM

How about this:
200K for top 25 wins.
150K for wins vs 26-50.
100K for wins vs 51-100.
75K for wins 101-200.
50K for wins 200+.

i love it. let's just tweak it a little higher on the quality scale. 250k for top 25s and 0k for 275-s. some get him locked up with this.

sys · « **Reply #47 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:41:58 PM »

wait, here's an even better idea. he gets 300k per win - the defeated opponent's end of year kp rank. so 299k for beating the kp champ and he owes the university 30k for beating the 330rd team.

Unruly · « **Reply #48 on:** February 03, 2017, 01:43:05 PM »

Can someone link this?

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/insider/story/_/id/18592026/update-college-basketball-coaches-hot-seat-2016-2017-season

I imagine it is filled with great lols

EDIT:

helps if I add the link...

renocat · « **Reply #49 on:** February 03, 2017, 03:04:57 PM »

I have to admit my intellectual and sophisticated side of my brain is still supporting oscar, but the caveman reactionary crass side says flush it before it becomes alive forever. If you want a change, you have to let General Myers know your thoughts. He knows about the glory days. He was in school when we beat KU regularly. Curdog could.care less.