Author Topic: Is 4 teams the right number for the CFP? (Read 3548 times)

Mike from Ft. Collins · « **on:** December 04, 2016, 10:47:38 PM »

If not, what is the right number?

schreds21 · « **Reply #1 on:** December 04, 2016, 10:49:43 PM »

HerrSonntag · « **Reply #2 on:** December 04, 2016, 11:04:38 PM »

128, just grab a few high school teams to round out the first round and give the KUs of the world a shot at the second round

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #3 on:** December 04, 2016, 11:04:50 PM »

whatever number doesn't include colorado state

star seed 7 · « **Reply #4 on:** December 04, 2016, 11:46:52 PM »

64 this mother rough rider

That_Guy · « **Reply #5 on:** December 05, 2016, 01:38:50 AM »

6. Top two teams get a 1st round bye.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MadCat · « **Reply #6 on:** December 05, 2016, 07:13:50 AM »

3 team round robin

Clevey 2 Times · « **Reply #7 on:** December 05, 2016, 07:45:49 AM »

Has anyone consistently started more stupid threads than Mike from Ft. Collins?

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #8 on:** December 05, 2016, 08:45:17 AM »

Quote from: That_Guy on December 05, 2016, 01:38:50 AM

6. Top two teams get a 1st round bye.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This for now. The 5 conference champions and the highest ranked non champ. Two highest ranked get the bye.

OK_Cat · « **Reply #9 on:** December 05, 2016, 08:47:57 AM »

8

Conference champs from each of the P5, an at-large from the champs of the lower conferences, and then 2 at large

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

cfbandyman · « **Reply #10 on:** December 05, 2016, 09:05:06 AM »

Quote from: OK_Cat on December 05, 2016, 08:47:57 AM

8

Conference champs from each of the P5, an at-large from the champs of the lower conferences, and then 2 at large

CHONGS · « **Reply #11 on:** December 05, 2016, 09:06:23 AM »

ChiPPs

scottwildcat · « **Reply #12 on:** December 05, 2016, 09:27:51 AM »

scottwildcat · « **Reply #13 on:** December 05, 2016, 09:34:17 AM »

Quote from: That_Guy on December 05, 2016, 01:38:50 AM

6. Top two teams get a 1st round bye.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This, in my opinion, is the absolute worst option. If you're going to expand go to 8, but you should stay at 4. They've gotten it correct each year since its started.

EMAWzifried · « **Reply #14 on:** December 05, 2016, 10:31:26 AM »

Does a CSU fan need to wrap his head around this? Leave it to the P5 big boys to figure out so you can keep monitoring your three-star B-back recruits.

KITNfury · « **Reply #15 on:** December 05, 2016, 10:45:38 AM »

8 is the right answer

LeggoKatZ · « **Reply #16 on:** December 06, 2016, 09:48:15 PM »

Quote from: OK_Cat on December 05, 2016, 08:47:57 AM

8

Conference champs from each of the P5, an at-large from the champs of the lower conferences, and then 2 at large

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1, I can't understand why more people don't see it this way.

wetwillie · « **Reply #17 on:** December 06, 2016, 10:00:38 PM »

The #4 team is more than 2 touchdown dogs to the #1 team. I don't see why we need 8 teams to determine who is the best.

pissclams · « **Reply #18 on:** December 06, 2016, 10:15:27 PM »

we don't need really need any teams to play in order to determine who is best

kim carnes · « **Reply #19 on:** December 06, 2016, 10:19:09 PM »

Who cares about conference champs? I certainly don't. Whether or not you won your conference is irrelevant to being the best team in the country.

catastrophe · « **Reply #20 on:** December 06, 2016, 10:28:14 PM »

Quote from: pissclams on December 06, 2016, 10:15:27 PM

we don't need really need any teams to play in order to determine who is best

Yep. They had it right the first time. Just vote for a team after the season is over.

Heck, just vote for a team before the season starts.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #21 on:** December 07, 2016, 08:11:48 AM »

Quote from: kim carnes on December 06, 2016, 10:19:09 PM

Who cares about conference champs? I certainly don't. Whether or not you won your conference is irrelevant to being the best team in the country.

W-L record is too, really.

_33 · « **Reply #22 on:** December 07, 2016, 09:32:34 AM »

There is no right number. The BCS was much better and I called that people would be pining for the BCS after a couple years of the CFP disaster. What a joke.

mocat · « **Reply #23 on:** December 07, 2016, 09:33:31 AM »

everything is fine, sheesh.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #24 on:** December 07, 2016, 09:34:06 AM »

I really wish Kim Carnes meant just half of the stuff he posts. It's not as entertaining knowing he's just trolling and trying to get a rise out of people.