Non-Presidential stuff on the ballot

[mocat]

People that think marijuana use leads to heroin use are people who've never tried it and/or are mindless indoctrinated idiots.

yes

[Emo EMAW]

I think it's much more of a social cause and effect than anything directly attributable to the drug itself.  Loser pot smokers hang out with other loser pot smokers, they're in a situation and ya man I'll try heroine cool. 

[mhkpasa]

I think it's much more of a social cause and effect than anything directly attributable to the drug itself.  Loser pot smokers hang out with other loser pot smokers, they're in a situation and ya man I'll try heroine cool.

[Emo EMAW]

I think it's much more of a social cause and effect than anything directly attributable to the drug itself.  Loser pot smokers hang out with other loser pot smokers, they're in a situation and ya man I'll try heroine cool.

I wanted to specifically differentiate between loser pot smokers and everyday normal successful people who happen to smoke pot, of which I am aware there are some that actually exist. 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

The notion that weed is safer than alcohol and vice versa is so absurd it's ot even worth debating.

I thinks the statistics that weed is safer is based on car crashes or cirrhosis or something absurd like that.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

Every person who wants to smoke pot is already doing it. Legalization will do very little to increase its use.

Also, marijuana used as a supplement to opiates can cut the opiate use in half for people with chronic pain. Granted, you are trading one drug for another, but marijuana is much less harmful to your internal organs than opiates.

[Mrs. Gooch]

The notion that weed is safer than alcohol and vice versa is so absurd it's ot even worth debating.

You are saying that the idea that weed is safer than alcohol is absurd.
And also that the idea that alcohol is safer than weed is absurd.

Do I understand this correctly?

[ChiComCat]

The difference is that too much alcohol can kill you and too much weed can't. 

Although both are dangerous because they both can impair you to the point where you make reckless decisions.

[mocat]

alcohol is more dangerous to a user, and to people around the user, than marijuana. i mean, it's not even close.

[CNS]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

[Mrs. Gooch]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

[Emo EMAW]

Ya know I could benefit from my boss smoking weed.

[mocat]

because your boss would turn into a heroin junkie, making you the new boss?

[Emo EMAW]

No I just think it would chill her out, man.

[Gooch]

No I just think it would chill her out, man.

And there it is. Emo can't handle being managed by a woman?

[Rage Against the McKee]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

What difference would that make?

[Mrs. Gooch]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

What difference would that make?

The basis for employers still being able to fire people is that it is still a federal crime.

[Rage Against the McKee]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

What difference would that make?

The basis for employers still being able to fire people is that it is still a federal crime.

Employers can't have a company policy that employees can't smoke pot if it's not a federal crime?

[Mrs. Gooch]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

What difference would that make?

The basis for employers still being able to fire people is that it is still a federal crime.

Employers can't have a company policy that employees can't smoke pot if it's not a federal crime?

It would be like having a policy that you can't drink alcohol outside of work hours.

[Mrs. Gooch]

Also medical marijuana would be protected by the ADA if it wasn't a schedule 1 drug.

[CNS]

Not recreational

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

[Rage Against the McKee]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

What difference would that make?

The basis for employers still being able to fire people is that it is still a federal crime.

Employers can't have a company policy that employees can't smoke pot if it's not a federal crime?

It would be like having a policy that you can't drink alcohol outside of work hours.

Yeah. I'm assuming companies can do that. I'm really don't know if they can, though.

[Kat Kid]

So what?  I don't think it will go bananas, though.   Testing detects it for weeks and legalizing it won't effect the fact that your boss can fire you for having in your system

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

This is why it needs to be legal federally.

What difference would that make?

The basis for employers still being able to fire people is that it is still a federal crime.

Employers can't have a company policy that employees can't smoke pot if it's not a federal crime?

It would be like having a policy that you can't drink alcohol outside of work hours.

Yeah. I'm assuming companies can do that. I'm really don't know if they can, though.

sure they can.  see pro sports in colorado for an obvious example.

[steve dave]

we had a death penalty yeah or nah. I picked nah.

[sys]

we had two death penalties.  one yeah or nah and one kill them faster/better.