Poll

Pretty simple question, who are you voting for in the presidential election?

Hillary Clinton
17 (36.2%)
Gary Johnson
15 (31.9%)
Jill Stein
2 (4.3%)
Donald Trump
5 (10.6%)
Other
3 (6.4%)
Not voting because I'm unhappy with the choices
5 (10.6%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who you got?  (Read 9471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2016, 02:09:49 PM »
Your identity is [redacted], not republicancat08. You're not married to the god damn GOP. You don't owe the GOP anything, and the GOP doesn't give a eff about you, anyway. Take a look at all of the candidate's platforms and cast your vote for the person who most aligns with your beliefs. It's not hard, but it does take a little effort.
Fair! Good point. :thumbs:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2016, 02:12:27 PM »
I guess I just look at a 3rd party vote, as a wasted vote, but that's kind of dumb too. There's no way he could be as bad as the other two options tho. Will do some research.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2016, 02:30:40 PM »
I'm very excited for a woman president. It will be good for American society, even if she is careless with classified info. I'm sure my take is influenced by the fact that I have two daughters and the fact that Trump is a complete buffoon (as I've mentioned before).

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2016, 02:40:13 PM »
This poll is invalid without a Harambe option.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36664
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #29 on: September 08, 2016, 02:41:43 PM »
So, an example of a woman as president for your daughters to see is more important than god knows what being left accessible to pretty much any state department with a moderate level of cyber ability?

That seems silly.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #30 on: September 08, 2016, 02:43:35 PM »
Would an ultra conservative woman president be good for American society?

Would a relatable, seemingly decent person who is s conservative like say Nikki Haley be as good, worse, or better for America than a win at all cost, me first, overly ambitious, shifting moderate/liberal?

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41981
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #31 on: September 08, 2016, 02:44:37 PM »
If you feel really strongly, I'll sell you my vote, both in this poll and the real election.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #32 on: September 08, 2016, 02:52:54 PM »
Oh, God. If I go through the trouble of registering and going to the polling place on election day, I'm casting my own damn vote, not someone else's. Unless it's like $100 or something.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #33 on: September 08, 2016, 02:54:17 PM »


So, an example of a woman as president for your daughters to see is more important than god knows what being left accessible to pretty much any state department with a moderate level of cyber ability?

That seems silly.

I've said many times that I think the government keeps too many secrets. I don't think I am any less safe because of Hillary's carelessness (or deliberate breaking of the law). So yeah, a female president is more important.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41981
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #34 on: September 08, 2016, 02:55:32 PM »
I'm expecting I'll be able to do it all by mail, so it's no extra effort for me.

How much do you really value who you got???

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #35 on: September 08, 2016, 02:55:59 PM »


Would an ultra conservative woman president be good for American society?

Would a relatable, seemingly decent person who is s conservative like say Nikki Haley be as good, worse, or better for America than a win at all cost, me first, overly ambitious, shifting moderate/liberal?

This is a good point.  I disagree with a lot of what she's done, but I don't find Hillary's policies/history objectionable enough to disqualify her in this election.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19735
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2016, 03:00:09 PM »
Hilary

Donald Trump isn't a serious candidate. 

Things aren't bad for me or people I know so Hilary is 4 more years of that.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2016, 03:00:40 PM »


Would an ultra conservative woman president be good for American society?

Would a relatable, seemingly decent person who is s conservative like say Nikki Haley be as good, worse, or better for America than a win at all cost, me first, overly ambitious, shifting moderate/liberal?

This is a good point.  I disagree with a lot of what she's done, but I don't find Hillary's policies/history objectionable enough to disqualify her in this election.

Thanks

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15214
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2016, 03:01:41 PM »
I mean, she has definitely committed crimes that are punishable by jail time. That's pretty close to a DQ.

That said, what better way to show equality between women and men by electing a woman president just as corrupt as any other man to hold the office.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2016, 03:02:36 PM »
Things aren't bad for me or people I know so Hilary is 4 more years of that.

I'm still not voting for her but this is a great point. Hopefully she isn't serious about how she says she feels about the ACA though.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #40 on: September 08, 2016, 03:03:11 PM »


So, an example of a woman as president for your daughters to see is more important than god knows what being left accessible to pretty much any state department with a moderate level of cyber ability?

That seems silly.

I've said many times that I think the government keeps too many secrets. I don't think I am any less safe because of Hillary's carelessness (or deliberate breaking of the law). So yeah, a female president is more important.

She was careless with classified information because she was trying to keep her own business secret from the press. If you don't like government secrets, that's actually a good reason to not vote for her. I think she's better overall than Trump, though.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30389
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #41 on: September 08, 2016, 03:07:30 PM »
Gary Johnson appears to not be dying so I'm going to vote for him.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #42 on: September 08, 2016, 03:08:16 PM »
Gary Johnson appears to not be dying so I'm going to vote for him.
Pffttt. Hillary will kill his ass if he does win.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22246
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #43 on: September 08, 2016, 03:40:07 PM »
let he who hasn't committed a crime punishable by jail time cast the first stone


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #44 on: September 08, 2016, 03:48:37 PM »
I'm very excited for a woman president. It will be good for American society, even if she is careless with classified info. I'm sure my take is influenced by the fact that I have two daughters and the fact that Trump is a complete buffoon (as I've mentioned before).

Ivanka is a better role model

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #45 on: September 08, 2016, 03:49:13 PM »
2 voters for WUD.   I would not be suprised if he loses Kansas.  So I am starting the rumor he will name Brownback Ag. Secretary.   YIPPE NEW GOVERNOR!!

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #46 on: September 08, 2016, 03:56:37 PM »
I'm very excited for a woman president. It will be good for American society, even if she is careless with classified info. I'm sure my take is influenced by the fact that I have two daughters and the fact that Trump is a complete buffoon (as I've mentioned before).

Ivanka is a better role model

I'm guessing that rusty has higher aspirations for his daughters than third trophy wife. I certainly do.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19425
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #47 on: September 08, 2016, 04:08:02 PM »
I'm very excited for a woman president. It will be good for American society, even if she is careless with classified info. I'm sure my take is influenced by the fact that I have two daughters and the fact that Trump is a complete buffoon (as I've mentioned before).

Ivanka is a better role model

I'm guessing that rusty has higher aspirations for his daughters than third trophy wife. I certainly do.
Ivanka is his daughter.  The one he wants to bone.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #48 on: September 08, 2016, 04:09:26 PM »
I'm very excited for a woman president. It will be good for American society, even if she is careless with classified info. I'm sure my take is influenced by the fact that I have two daughters and the fact that Trump is a complete buffoon (as I've mentioned before).

Ivanka is a better role model

I'm guessing that rusty has higher aspirations for his daughters than third trophy wife. I certainly do.
Ivanka is his daughter.  The one he wants to bone.
Who doesn't? :love: :drool: :fatty:
« Last Edit: September 08, 2016, 04:17:31 PM by WackyCat08 »

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Who you got?
« Reply #49 on: September 08, 2016, 04:10:29 PM »
I'm very excited for a woman president. It will be good for American society, even if she is careless with classified info. I'm sure my take is influenced by the fact that I have two daughters and the fact that Trump is a complete buffoon (as I've mentioned before).

Ivanka is a better role model

I'm guessing that rusty has higher aspirations for his daughters than third trophy wife. I certainly do.

it's a bit misogynist to dismiss her success and personality because of her beauty. and racist