Author Topic: I just didn't see this coming (Read 1654 times)

sonofdaxjones · « **on:** March 12, 2016, 05:50:01 AM »

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/obama-says-cannot-legal-case-apple-inc-223034884--finance.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma

I can hear the Khrennikov in the background now.

wetwillie · « **Reply #1 on:** March 12, 2016, 05:56:35 AM »

Quote

"What mechanisms do we have available to even do simple things like tax enforcement because if in fact you can't crack that at all, government can't get in, then everybody is walking around with a Swiss bank account in their pocket."

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2 on:** March 12, 2016, 06:02:45 AM »

So your smart phone is a small island state somewhere in the Caribbean or South Pacific with a shady banking system?

michigancat · « **Reply #3 on:** March 12, 2016, 09:35:24 AM »

Yikes

CNS · « **Reply #4 on:** March 12, 2016, 09:42:49 AM »

So stupid

michigancat · « **Reply #5 on:** March 12, 2016, 09:47:07 AM »

Did he really say he was committed to civil liberties in the same speech? Amazing

MakeItRain · « **Reply #6 on:** March 12, 2016, 04:24:55 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on March 12, 2016, 05:50:01 AM

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/obama-says-cannot-legal-case-apple-inc-223034884--finance.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma

I can hear the Khrennikov in the background now.

Obummer is dead ass wrong about this, of course, but didn't you spend two weeks on here having a fit about net neutrality? It seems as if you are inconsistent on your stance on the role of government in technology but consistent on hating all things Obama.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7 on:** March 12, 2016, 04:25:36 PM »

Umm what!

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #8 on:** March 12, 2016, 04:37:54 PM »

Lol, so you're actually saying that an over reach by the executive branch into the regulatory oversight of a government agency on what is essentially now the third utility is the same as a blatant attack on privacy??

LOL only you MIR, only you.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #9 on:** March 13, 2016, 10:21:46 AM »

What I'm saying is that your inconsistency on the issue speaks more to you being a mindless partisan shill than it does about your grasp of the two issues at hand.

catastrophe · « **Reply #10 on:** March 14, 2016, 01:11:31 PM »

Guys, enforcing the law is hard ok? Why not help Barry out by creating a single means to access all electronically stored information? What is the worst that could happen?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11 on:** March 14, 2016, 08:13:35 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on March 13, 2016, 10:21:46 AM

What I'm saying is that your inconsistency on the issue speaks more to you being a mindless partisan shill than it does about your grasp of the two issues at hand.

WTF are you talking about? I had like 3 or 4 posts in the net neutrality thread of which one discussed the massive costs of building networks in the United States, another had to do with telecom lawyers (and lobbyists) and their ability to work the rules to big telecoms advantage, and one addressing overreach into the policy domain by the executive branch. Net Neutrality doesn't have much to do with a sitting president advocating for outright government access into personal electronic devices . . . translation; give us another backdoor in so we can spy on you.

wetwillie · « **Reply #12 on:** March 14, 2016, 08:22:08 PM »

Dax I feel like you are too much a part of Big Networking to be impartial on net neutrality, like slobber talking about lawn care or Rick Daris and police

star seed 7 · « **Reply #13 on:** March 14, 2016, 08:29:15 PM »

ipa4me and honeywell equipment

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #14 on:** March 14, 2016, 08:34:03 PM »

I see nothing inconsistent with opposition to federal LEO monitoring and opposing massive regulation of the internet

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #15 on:** March 14, 2016, 10:07:30 PM »

Quote from: wetwillie on March 14, 2016, 08:22:08 PM

Dax I feel like you are too much a part of Big Networking to be impartial on net neutrality, like slobber talking about lawn care or Rick Daris and police

Not anymore chief.

Again, I only see at best a fringe crossover between net neutrality and the government demanding a backdoor into personnel electronic devices . . . and that's being extremely loose with the concept of fringe.

wetwillie · « **Reply #16 on:** March 14, 2016, 10:11:05 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on March 14, 2016, 10:07:30 PM

Quote from: wetwillie on March 14, 2016, 08:22:08 PM
Dax I feel like you are too much a part of Big Networking to be impartial on net neutrality, like slobber talking about lawn care or Rick Daris and police

Not anymore chief.

Again, I only see at best a fringe crossover between net neutrality and the government demanding a backdoor into personnel electronic devices . . . and that's being extremely loose with the concept of fringe.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #17 on:** March 14, 2016, 11:00:29 PM »

Ptolemy · « **Reply #18 on:** March 14, 2016, 11:17:36 PM »

HA

You guys trusted Obama!

star seed 7 · « **Reply #19 on:** March 14, 2016, 11:45:58 PM »

well eff... you mean he's not perfect?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #20 on:** March 15, 2016, 11:12:57 AM »

10000 miles from Hope and Change.