Author Topic: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV  (Read 3070 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« on: February 16, 2016, 10:17:58 PM »


No moment of this game made me mad. Or happy.

Of course, I didn't watch a moment.

The ugly road streak is over and the NIT bubble is back.

Cats.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2016, 10:20:48 PM »
The Flush making four 3s made me happy. That was about it tho.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2016, 10:22:31 PM »
just look at that 3% d.   :lick:
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2016, 10:24:06 PM »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2016, 10:28:01 PM »
and #9 in overall d.  wow (legit, non-ironic wow).
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2016, 10:32:25 PM »

and #9 in overall d.  wow (legit, non-ironic wow).

If we had an average shooting team we'd be legit talking about the tornament right now.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2016, 10:37:25 PM »
the really weird thing is they aren't good at most of the defensive components.  not great at 2% d, not good at dboarding, not good at blocks, not good at preventing 3 attempts, not good at not fouling.

very good at turnovers.  great at 3% d.  not horrible at any of the stuff they're not good at.  somehow it adds up to a top 10 defense.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile

Offline Boondock Poonhound

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 434
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2016, 10:45:41 PM »
58.8 FT% in 2nd half seemed like 30%. This is why we are losing close games.
"He's in Shape !"

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2016, 10:55:08 PM »

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2016, 11:00:19 PM »
7th time in 9 games that our TO% has been 25.0 or higher.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2016, 12:07:49 AM »
I thought Claws did well.  Bigmeat is pitiful.  Westicles played shriveled.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2016, 12:47:59 AM »
7th time in 9 games that our TO% has been 25.0 or higher.

Big problem, I don't think this team will solve it.

Offline rob mccolley

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Fan
  • *****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2016, 05:30:13 AM »
I've never met John Currie. Is this win enough to secure another five to ten years for Brooth?

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21953
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2016, 06:20:50 AM »
I've never met John Currie. Is this win enough to secure another five to ten years for Brooth?

I don't know if any coach is ever secure for 15-20 years.

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1410
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2016, 06:25:37 AM »
https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/699811824032571393

jfc. The whole team is just a bunch of rough ridin' losers

I'll let this slide.  I don't remember everything I did 400+ days ago either.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2016, 06:33:20 AM »

7th time in 9 games that our TO% has been 25.0 or higher.

Big problem, I don't think this team will solve it.

It's legit to say losing Stokes has definitely hurt, especially in this area, and definitely without him there isn't a great solution. JMHO.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30591
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2016, 06:41:22 AM »
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2016, 06:53:30 AM »

https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/699811824032571393

jfc. The whole team is just a bunch of rough ridin' losers

I'll let this slide.  I don't remember everything I did 400+ days ago either.

This wasn't just anything, this was the lone big 12 road win, the only one of his career previous.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15268
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #19 on: February 17, 2016, 07:21:30 AM »
Maybe he was just trolling OU.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #20 on: February 17, 2016, 09:57:33 AM »
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #21 on: February 17, 2016, 10:17:23 AM »
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.

?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #22 on: February 17, 2016, 10:37:29 AM »
i believe it's a stat for the number of times hot horndogs realizes he can't trust his black teammates to get the ball to wade and takes care of the job himself.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #23 on: February 17, 2016, 10:43:29 AM »

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46697
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
« Reply #24 on: February 17, 2016, 11:43:25 AM »
don't buy into the media's talking point that losing our true freshman point guard is what killed our season
stokes is a great prospect, for sure, but he doesn't solve this team's problems


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.