Author Topic: Scalia  (Read 56851 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #625 on: February 26, 2016, 09:55:24 AM »
Again, just pure political grandstanding by Biden. 

Hey Mr. President we know you're granted powers to nominate and we'll consider your nomination as long as you float some names and we preapprove them.

Lol.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #626 on: February 26, 2016, 09:56:45 AM »

you guys are delusional (not you CNS)

Mo, you define and redefine delusion in your own way, everyday. :thumbsup

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #627 on: February 26, 2016, 10:02:23 AM »
Again, just pure political grandstanding by Biden. 

Hey Mr. President we know you're granted powers to nominate and we'll consider your nomination as long as you float some names and we preapprove them.

Lol.
How many times have Dems said they won't even hear names of nominees?  History & Fact > you
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Scalia
« Reply #628 on: February 26, 2016, 10:05:26 AM »
What you don't get Whackadoodle is that Biden was espousing a back room pre approved (and only considered if pre approved) justice nomination and approval process.

You're just too much of a hateful Whackadoodle dumbass to realize it.


Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #629 on: February 26, 2016, 10:21:56 AM »
What you don't get Whackadoodle is that Biden was espousing a back room pre approved (and only considered if pre approved) justice nomination and approval process.

You're just too much of a hateful Whackadoodle dumbass to realize it.
If only that was true.....

Tell me again when the Dems said they would meet with no one during a vacancy? 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Scalia
« Reply #630 on: February 26, 2016, 10:26:50 AM »
What you don't get Whackadoodle is that Biden was espousing a back room pre approved (and only considered if pre approved) justice nomination and approval process.

You're just too much of a hateful Whackadoodle dumbass to realize it.
If only that was true.....

Tell me again when the Dems said they would meet with no one during a vacancy?

What a weak ass argument.  First of all its either been a long time or never since a situation like this occurred (nominee at the end of a two term president) and LOL x a gazillion if you think it wouldn't be the same if the shoe was on the other foot.

It's sad and pathetic that you are lauding a canned, back room, pre approved nomination process, which is exactly what Biden wanted.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #631 on: February 26, 2016, 10:35:07 AM »
What you don't get Whackadoodle is that Biden was espousing a back room pre approved (and only considered if pre approved) justice nomination and approval process.

You're just too much of a hateful Whackadoodle dumbass to realize it.
If only that was true.....

Tell me again when the Dems said they would meet with no one during a vacancy?

What a weak ass argument.  First of all its either been a long time or never since a situation like this occurred (nominee at the end of a two term president) and LOL x a gazillion if you think it wouldn't be the same if the shoe was on the other foot.

It's sad and pathetic that you are lauding a canned, back room, pre approved nomination process, which is exactly what Biden wanted.




Do you ever think to fact check anything or just blast the keyboard and fap about your posts?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Scalia
« Reply #632 on: February 26, 2016, 10:37:41 AM »
The simple fact that you consistently reference entrenched left media or irrelevant satire to try and back up your BS only proves that you're utterly incapable of thinking for yourself
« Last Edit: February 26, 2016, 10:56:13 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #633 on: February 26, 2016, 10:41:02 AM »
Oh and Kennedy was nominated in November of 1987.  #facts.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Scalia
« Reply #634 on: February 26, 2016, 10:54:21 AM »
Oh and the open SC chair process that eventually got Kennedy had been ongoing for months and months prior. 

What a horrifically awful "fact" to use in defense of an equally awful position.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #635 on: February 26, 2016, 10:59:43 AM »
Flailing
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37188
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #636 on: February 26, 2016, 11:00:48 AM »
Congress not doing their job is A-OK . . . as long as a democrat is in office.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #637 on: February 26, 2016, 11:10:47 AM »
Lol at Whackadoodle thinking he actually had something.

The process that got to Kennedy began nearly 18 months before the election of 1988 and over 20 months before a new president took office.

Lol, what a dumbass.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #638 on: February 26, 2016, 11:13:55 AM »

Congress not doing their job is A-OK . . . as long as a democrat is in office.

Congress should just be a rubber approval stamp . . . But only if a democrat is president. 

Checks and balances are paramount!:  But only if a Republican is president. 

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #639 on: February 26, 2016, 11:21:52 AM »
Lol at Whackadoodle thinking he actually had something.

The process that got to Kennedy began nearly 18 months before the election of 1988 and over 20 months before a new president took office.

Lol, what a dumbass.

The fact that you don't understand the Pubs have blocked even the "process" from starting shows how out of depth you are. 
But it's great you think a 9 month vacancy is now an 18 month "process", even with 3 nominees.  And somehow you think it was 20 months before H.  I think you need to pull out a calendar.
flailing
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36812
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #640 on: February 26, 2016, 11:23:28 AM »
Rubber stamp.  Won't even review. 

Now that we have established the spectrum, let's all notice that dax only thinks one end of it is ridic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #641 on: February 26, 2016, 11:28:25 AM »
Lol.  Powell announced his retirement in June of 1987, the next presidential election wasn't until November 1998. 

Bork was nominated in July of 1987.   Calendar says!   Over a year before Nov. 8th 1988. 

Only a total dumbass would try to say it's the same as what's happening now. 

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53952
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #642 on: February 26, 2016, 11:29:33 AM »
Lol.  Powell announced his retirement in June of 1987, the next presidential election wasn't until November 1998. 

Bork was nominated in July of 1987.   Calendar says!   Over a year before Nov. 8th 1988. 

Only a total dumbass would try to say it's the same as what's happening now. 

tons of people tried to say what happened to Bork was the same as what's happening now.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39266
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #643 on: February 26, 2016, 11:30:29 AM »

Congress not doing their job is A-OK . . . as long as a democrat is in office.

Congress should just be a rubber approval stamp . . . But only if a democrat is president. 

Checks and balances are paramount!:  But only if a Republican is president.

this is the stuff _33 makes fun of you guys for

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #644 on: February 26, 2016, 11:33:52 AM »


Congress not doing their job is A-OK . . . as long as a democrat is in office.

Congress should just be a rubber approval stamp . . . But only if a democrat is president. 

Checks and balances are paramount!:  But only if a Republican is president.

this is the stuff _33 makes fun of you guys for

Hey ya know if you come over and meet with us behind closed doors and we preapprove your nominee, then we'll put on a dog and pony show for public consumption.

That's what Biden essentially said in 1992. 

Sad that's what you guys want out your elected officials. 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Scalia
« Reply #645 on: February 26, 2016, 11:35:01 AM »
Lol.  Powell announced his retirement in June of 1987, the next presidential election wasn't until November 1998. 

Bork was nominated in July of 1987.   Calendar says!   Over a year before Nov. 8th 1988. 

Only a total dumbass would try to say it's the same as what's happening now. 

tons of people tried to say what happened to Bork was the same as what's happening now.

Thanks for your input cRusty.  Meaningless but noted anyway.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #646 on: February 26, 2016, 11:43:35 AM »
See guys, all Obama has to do is appoint a white supremacist who committed sedition against the good ole US of A and Dax will be happy.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #647 on: February 26, 2016, 11:44:34 AM »

See guys, all Obama has to do is appoint a white supremacist who committed sedition against the good ole US of A and Dax will be happy.

Massive tap out.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #648 on: February 26, 2016, 11:46:55 AM »


Congress not doing their job is A-OK . . . as long as a democrat is in office.

Congress should just be a rubber approval stamp . . . But only if a democrat is president. 

Checks and balances are paramount!:  But only if a Republican is president.

this is the stuff _33 makes fun of you guys for

Hey ya know if you come over and meet with us behind closed doors and we preapprove your nominee, then we'll put on a dog and pony show for public consumption.

That's what Biden essentially said in 1992. 

Sad that's what you guys want out your elected officials.
Or he was saying don't even bother submitting a white supremacist who helped attack the fundamental underpinnings of our democratic institutions.   SUCH BACKROOM DEALINGS! Oh and who was Biden referring to in '92? 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Scalia
« Reply #649 on: February 26, 2016, 11:48:14 AM »


Congress not doing their job is A-OK . . . as long as a democrat is in office.

Congress should just be a rubber approval stamp . . . But only if a democrat is president. 

Checks and balances are paramount!:  But only if a Republican is president.

this is the stuff _33 makes fun of you guys for

Hey ya know if you come over and meet with us behind closed doors and we preapprove your nominee, then we'll put on a dog and pony show for public consumption.

That's what Biden essentially said in 1992. 

Sad that's what you guys want out your elected officials.
Or he was saying don't even bother submitting a white supremacist who helped attack the fundamental underpinnings of our democratic institutions.   SUCH BACKROOM DEALINGS! Oh and who was Biden referring to in '92?

Yeah, that's it.  Lol.  #flailing

Oh, so now Biden was saying that because who might have been nominated?   #turbospincycle