Author Topic: Scalia  (Read 55671 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #400 on: February 19, 2016, 07:20:22 AM »
:party:
:adios:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #401 on: February 19, 2016, 08:45:05 AM »
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

I think we've probably had a few closet atheists as president, don't you? You just want a self-professed atheist?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7640
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #402 on: February 19, 2016, 08:57:47 AM »
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

If it's any consolation, I don't think Obama means it when he says 'God bless America'.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36690
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #403 on: February 19, 2016, 09:20:47 AM »
I really don't give a crap.  I would just love for the entirety of the field to leave it out of the political race.  It's a private thing, practice it in private.  I feel the same way about politicians infidelity as well, btw. 

I did hear a podcast this week talking about how atheists and agnostics are growing faster than any religious group in our county and how given that stat, and the size of their contingent, it is interesting how politics seem to be getting more and more religious in what is discussed and how often god or jesus are referenced.   For instance: evidently Reagan started the whole thing about ending all speeches with "god bless America".  I guess that wasn't a thing before him in the '80's.  Now everyone does it. Seems weird to me that something like that started so recently.


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #404 on: February 19, 2016, 09:25:26 AM »
I really don't give a crap.  I would just love for the entirety of the field to leave it out of the political race.  It's a private thing, practice it in private.  I feel the same way about politicians infidelity as well, btw. 

I did hear a podcast this week talking about how atheists and agnostics are growing faster than any religious group in our county and how given that stat, and the size of their contingent, it is interesting how politics seem to be getting more and more religious in what is discussed and how often god or jesus are referenced.   For instance: evidently Reagan started the whole thing about ending all speeches with "god bless America".  I guess that wasn't a thing before him in the '80's.  Now everyone does it. Seems weird to me that something like that started so recently.

All of the "Under God", "In God We Trust", etc. stuff came about after WW2. It's anti-communist propaganda, mostly.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #405 on: February 19, 2016, 10:20:40 AM »
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

If it's any consolation, I don't think Obama means it when he says 'God bless America'.

$10 says you freaked out about Jeremiah Wright

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64053
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #406 on: February 19, 2016, 10:21:12 AM »
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

I think we've probably had a few closet atheists as president, don't you? You just want a self-professed atheist?

Yes, it's hard to imagine people bright enough to be on the Supreme Court actually believing in fairy tales
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15226
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #407 on: February 19, 2016, 10:34:03 AM »
I think most people feel more comfortable thinking that an elected or appointed official believes he is accountable to an all-knowing and all-powerful being for everything he does, even if he doesn't get caught.

There's also the Declaration of Independence ("endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, etc.").

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #408 on: February 19, 2016, 10:45:31 AM »
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

I think we've probably had a few closet atheists as president, don't you? You just want a self-professed atheist?

Absolutely, it's a sign of tolerance and progress for society.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #409 on: February 19, 2016, 05:55:58 PM »
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

I think we've probably had a few closet atheists as president, don't you? You just want a self-professed atheist?

Yes, it's hard to imagine people bright enough to be on the Supreme Court actually believing in fairy tales

I've never understood this mindset, if someone wants to take comfort in a faith, why do you care?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64053
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #410 on: February 19, 2016, 06:04:46 PM »
I don't think I said I care  :confused:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #411 on: February 19, 2016, 06:11:00 PM »


http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

I think we've probably had a few closet atheists as president, don't you? You just want a self-professed atheist?

Yes, it's hard to imagine people bright enough to be on the Supreme Court actually believing in fairy tales

I've never understood this mindset, if someone wants to take comfort in a faith, why do you care?

The mindset is that supreme court justices should be rational thinkers, and blind faith is not rational. With someone on the street, it's generally not an issue, but it makes sense to care when the supreme court is involved.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51512
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #412 on: February 19, 2016, 06:15:24 PM »
Here comes the "the smartest person I know is very religious" crew

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #413 on: February 19, 2016, 06:25:39 PM »


http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court
YES!

Please put one in the White House someday, too.

I think we've probably had a few closet atheists as president, don't you? You just want a self-professed atheist?

Yes, it's hard to imagine people bright enough to be on the Supreme Court actually believing in fairy tales

I've never understood this mindset, if someone wants to take comfort in a faith, why do you care?

The mindset is that supreme court justices should be rational thinkers, and blind faith is not rational. With someone on the street, it's generally not an issue, but it makes sense to care when the supreme court is involved.

Huh. Is there a difference bw "blind faith" and just plain ol "faith?" And are you suggesting that religious people are not, by definition, rational? Huh.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51512
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #414 on: February 19, 2016, 06:27:33 PM »
Is it rational to believe that someone was killed and came back to life 3 days later?

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #415 on: February 19, 2016, 06:37:11 PM »
And are you suggesting that religious people are not, by definition, rational? Huh.

Absolutely. Believing something that you know can never proven is irrational on some level. Obviously there are different levels of irrationality, and I don't think the presence of religious beliefs should necessarily disqualify someone from serving on the supreme court. But I totally understand the mindset of someone who thinks it should.

Here's an interesting read:

http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2013/09/16/222907684/can-faith-ever-be-rational

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Scalia
« Reply #416 on: February 19, 2016, 07:26:33 PM »
It has been shown in various studies that you are must less likely to believe in religion the more intelligent you are.  Mich and dickstone are spot on the last few posts

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Scalia
« Reply #417 on: February 19, 2016, 07:28:54 PM »
Notwithstanding their sophomoric idea of what religion is, it's hilariously ironic for a group of people with unyielding blind faith in the altruism of government to criticize and question the rationale of someone who believes in a higher power.

Libtards gonna libtard
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #418 on: February 19, 2016, 07:35:11 PM »
Notwithstanding their sophomoric idea of what religion is, it's hilariously ironic for a group of people with unyielding blind faith in the altruism of government to criticize and question the rationale of someone who believes in a higher power.

Libtards gonna libtard

I think you're one of those closet atheists

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #419 on: February 19, 2016, 07:38:58 PM »
Also lol at thinking I have blind faith in government

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #420 on: February 19, 2016, 07:39:21 PM »
I always think of rationality as consisting of something like an ability to legitimately infer true statements from other true statements. And I don't think someone who believes in God necessarily has less of this type of ability than someone who does not.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #421 on: February 19, 2016, 07:43:45 PM »
Come to think of it, I'd say calling someone less rational because they believe in God is an example being less rational in the sense that it is poor reasoning.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Scalia
« Reply #422 on: February 19, 2016, 07:44:24 PM »
Also lol at thinking I have blind faith in government

You compared religion to fairy tales. You deserved that.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64053
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #423 on: February 19, 2016, 07:44:41 PM »
Also lol at thinking I have blind faith in government

it's one of my favorite regresocon talking points
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Scalia
« Reply #424 on: February 19, 2016, 07:48:08 PM »
Also lol at thinking I have blind faith in government

You compared religion to fairy tales. You deserved that.
I didn't do that, atheist.