Author Topic: Fat Barbie (Read 3044 times)

renocat · « **on:** January 28, 2016, 05:17:14 PM »

Well the real gal pals have now affected Barbie dolls. They are plump with big butts. Sigh, what next? These pc people are going to ruin male horniness yet.

renocat · « **Reply #1 on:** January 28, 2016, 09:24:26 PM »

Shut up you low life sex fiend. It is time we quit treating women like sex objects. We start by letting little boys who watch their sisters play with Barbie known that women are more than big honkers.

Mrs. Gooch · « **Reply #2 on:** January 28, 2016, 10:24:50 PM »

The new Barbies are not fat. They should be called "slightly more realistic Barbie" instead of Curvy, Petite, and Tall Barbie.

The Big Train · « **Reply #3 on:** January 28, 2016, 10:27:36 PM »

the original barbie figure was actually humanly impossible by measurement standards

nicname · « **Reply #4 on:** January 28, 2016, 10:35:10 PM »

Quote from: The Big Train on January 28, 2016, 10:27:36 PM

the original barbie figure was actually humanly impossible by measurement standards

it's good to have goals

The Big Train · « **Reply #5 on:** January 28, 2016, 10:36:12 PM »

Quote from: nicname on January 28, 2016, 10:35:10 PM

Quote from: The Big Train on January 28, 2016, 10:27:36 PM
the original barbie figure was actually humanly impossible by measurement standards

it's good to have goals

yep, dying is a pretty attainable goal

ednksu · « **Reply #6 on:** January 28, 2016, 10:48:18 PM »

Quote from: renocat on January 28, 2016, 05:17:14 PM

Well the real gal pals have now affected Barbie dolls. They are plump with big butts. Sigh, what next? These pc people are going to ruin male horniness yet.

Quote from: renocat on January 28, 2016, 09:24:26 PM

Shut up you low life sex fiend. It is time we quit treating women like sex objects. We start by letting little boys who watch their sisters play with Barbie known that women are more than big honkers.

Did you forget which sock you were logged in as?

ednksu · « **Reply #7 on:** January 28, 2016, 10:50:53 PM »

Quote from: The Big Train on January 28, 2016, 10:27:36 PM

the original barbie figure was actually humanly impossible by measurement standards

http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/barbie-real-womaan-anatomically-impossible-article-1.1316533

Comically bad. Or that's just what the SJW thought police want you to believe!

cfbandyman · « **Reply #8 on:** January 29, 2016, 09:20:08 AM »

Quote from: ednksu on January 28, 2016, 10:48:18 PM

Quote from: renocat on January 28, 2016, 05:17:14 PM
Well the real gal pals have now affected Barbie dolls. They are plump with big butts. Sigh, what next? These pc people are going to ruin male horniness yet.
Quote from: renocat on January 28, 2016, 09:24:26 PM
Shut up you low life sex fiend. It is time we quit treating women like sex objects. We start by letting little boys who watch their sisters play with Barbie known that women are more than big honkers.
Did you forget which sock you were logged in as?

I do enjoy when that happens. Surprisingly often I see something like this.

renocat · « **Reply #9 on:** January 29, 2016, 01:24:50 PM »

Quote from: renocat on January 28, 2016, 09:24:26 PM

Shut up you low life sex fiend. It is time we quit treating women like sex objects. We start by letting little boys who watch their sisters play with Barbie known that women are more than big honkers.

Okay prude dude if you are so against the sexualization of women let's just ban all popular music and videos that kids listen and watch. They treat women like nothing more than groin grinders for men. Teach these little brains they live in the real world where sex is used by both men and women. Barbies started out as adult sex toys and gag gifts I say why ruin something good for.PC.

ednksu · « **Reply #10 on:** January 29, 2016, 01:36:06 PM »

Quote from: renocat on January 29, 2016, 01:24:50 PM

Quote from: renocat on January 28, 2016, 09:24:26 PM
Shut up you low life sex fiend. It is time we quit treating women like sex objects. We start by letting little boys who watch their sisters play with Barbie known that women are more than big honkers.
Okay prude dude if you are so against the sexualization of women let's just ban all popular music and videos that kids listen and watch. They treat women like nothing more than groin grinders for men. Teach these little brains they live in the real world where sex is used by both men and women. Barbies started out as adult sex toys and gag gifts I say why ruin something good for.PC.

Where do you come up with this stuff?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbie#History

The Big Train · « **Reply #11 on:** January 29, 2016, 01:36:22 PM »

What is going on

cfbandyman · « **Reply #12 on:** January 29, 2016, 02:08:36 PM »

Reno's multiple voices in his head are fighting it out ITT

renocat · « **Reply #13 on:** January 30, 2016, 08:56:05 AM »

Prude dude don't tell be this change is not a crusade by a bunch of denutter feminists and it is not this noble cause to desexualize. Why isn't there a "Ken dad" model with a pot gut, bald, and hair on his back?

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #14 on:** January 30, 2016, 09:02:22 AM »

Renocat hates the free market. Weird

renocat · « **Reply #15 on:** January 30, 2016, 03:42:19 PM »

I agree with Sundance just shut eff up. Crawl into your cave and draw obscene pictures on the of your bimbos. Women are not.sex meat.

renocat · « **Reply #16 on:** January 31, 2016, 04:56:36 PM »

Agree any smart man knows women ain't meat, but sex undertones are.still present. Trying to make kids toys to change this fact is ignorant. Girls.in past.didn't want a Porky Patty doll. I ask why?

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #17 on:** January 31, 2016, 05:21:18 PM »

I support the free market.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #18 on:** January 31, 2016, 05:24:05 PM »

Anyone who cares about this either way is an idiot

renocat · « **Reply #19 on:** January 31, 2016, 05:47:42 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 31, 2016, 05:24:05 PM

Anyone who cares about this either way is an idiot

My lost.post.to this thread. Libs hit.the nail on the head. Time.devoted a whole.cove4.to this. Social thinkers spent time debating. Mattel is.losing money on Barbie. They did well getting.a buzz. I would like.to see a pot.belly Ken and a Toad In Pantsuit Running for.President barbie.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #20 on:** January 31, 2016, 07:00:33 PM »

It's a doll. Based on my very limited experience with dolls, about 99% of dolls aren't anatomically realistic. The heads are bigger. Eyes are bigger. Who the F cares? I mean, besides crazy feminists.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #21 on:** January 31, 2016, 07:05:46 PM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 31, 2016, 07:00:33 PM

It's a doll. Based on my very limited experience with dolls, about 99% of dolls aren't anatomically realistic. The heads are bigger. Eyes are bigger. Who the F cares? I mean, besides crazy feminists.

and of course crazy regressocons that make a huge deal when a doll is changed

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #22 on:** January 31, 2016, 07:47:52 PM »

@ lib

star seed 7 · « **Reply #23 on:** January 31, 2016, 08:16:36 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 31, 2016, 05:24:05 PM

Anyone who cares about this either way is an idiot

oh man, how

such a weirdo dax

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #24 on:** January 31, 2016, 08:21:53 PM »

OMG so weird!