« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?  (Read 1274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« on: January 26, 2016, 08:56:45 PM »
ABC news is reporting MG will seriously consider naming legal expert circumventing the law Obama to the Supreme Court.  Boy this stirs the spoon in the conspiracy stew.  Explains why Ojustist is supporting MG and shafting the Hollering Sugar Daddy.  This flushes the Hillary indictment IMO.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Logged

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32587
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2016, 08:59:59 PM »
obama would be a fantastic justice.  Hope that happens.
Logged
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67583
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2016, 09:05:53 PM »
Would love for this to happen
Logged
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59853
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM »
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

Logged

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11164
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM »
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.
Logged
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59853
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2016, 11:05:16 PM »
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.

True.   
Logged

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2016, 11:15:49 PM »
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 11:05:16 PM
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.

True.

Clarence Thomas.

Quote from: renocat on January 26, 2016, 08:56:45 PM
ABC news is reporting MG will seriously consider naming legal expert circumventing the law Obama to the Supreme Court.  Boy this stirs the spoon in the conspiracy stew.  Explains why Ojustist is supporting MG and shafting the Hollering Sugar Daddy.  This flushes the Hillary indictment IMO.
LOL at thinking Obama gets anywhere close to a confirmation hearing.  Pub senators would jump from the rotunda to prevent a quorum.
Logged
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59853
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2016, 11:20:50 PM »
LOL @ edn, you know unlike Thomas, Barrack would be talking all the time, and since he'd be a former Pres, the interview requests and speech requests would be through the roof.

Logged

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2016, 12:02:33 AM »
Logged

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2016, 02:26:25 AM »
Doesn't have the resume.
Logged

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7834
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2016, 02:19:57 PM »
He wouldn't do it unless he could be Chief Justice.  :bawl:
Logged

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22795
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2016, 02:28:20 PM »
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.
you'd presumably hear him speak relatively extemporaneously during oral arguments
Logged


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53998
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2016, 10:46:19 PM »
He is going to make stupid money on speaking circuit, would never take job
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »