Author Topic: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)  (Read 6734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #50 on: January 11, 2016, 11:27:29 PM »
BV's D got picked apart! :frown:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #51 on: January 11, 2016, 11:28:02 PM »
Don't have to like him, but Saban is one of the best ever. 5 titles in 11 years is crazy.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #52 on: January 11, 2016, 11:43:49 PM »
That Coker interview was almost as painful as the Ezekiel Elliot interviews last year
@Trogdor_gE

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #53 on: January 12, 2016, 09:20:52 AM »
There has been quite a bit of justified talk about the onside kick. I also thought that the ball had to travel 10 yards and either hit the ground or have been touched by the receiving team. I know for sure in high school it must hit the ground AND travel 10 yards, but it doesn't sound like that is the case with college. However, the rule isn't completely clear.

https://twitter.com/jayfeely/status/686804165453058048

Under article 3 above, #1 definitely didn't happen. #2 did happen, but combined with #3 it just adds confusion.

To be fair, if the Clemson player had simply made an attempt to go field the ball while it was in the air, the Alabama player couldn't have touched him or it would have been kick catch interference.




Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #54 on: January 12, 2016, 09:55:28 AM »
The sub-articles contain the 'or' operator, so #2 is true and #3 being false shouldn't matter.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #55 on: January 12, 2016, 11:11:03 AM »
https://twitter.com/richarddeitsch/status/686951154475995136

The title game belongs on network TV. Do all of simulcast stuff on ESPN, ESPN2, etc., but the main feed needs to be available to the masses.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #56 on: January 12, 2016, 11:19:41 AM »
The sub-articles contain the 'or' operator, so #2 is true and #3 being false shouldn't matter.

That makes sense, but this is also why including #3 at all is confusing. The general conception by many in football is to assume the ball has to hit the ground on an onside kick. I know they changed some of the onside kick rules in the last few years for how many players can be on either side of the ball and the fact that the receiving team can fair catch a kick that bounces once, but I'm not sure if this was included.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20636
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #57 on: January 12, 2016, 11:35:52 AM »
I've never ever heard that the ball has to hit the ground.  The reason they kick it off the ground is to take away fair catch.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #58 on: January 12, 2016, 11:40:46 AM »
I've never ever heard that the ball has to hit the ground.  The reason they kick it off the ground is to take away fair catch.

Its probably the connection to high school where I know the rule is both hit the ground and travel 10 yards.

College now allows a fair catch on one bounce.

Offline purplehaze

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 364
  • #RP4POTUS
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #59 on: January 12, 2016, 12:23:34 PM »
Clemson lost on special teams, clearly. Could've used an expert coach of the year like Sean. :runaway:

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk


Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #60 on: January 12, 2016, 12:43:17 PM »
https://twitter.com/richarddeitsch/status/686951154475995136

The title game belongs on network TV. Do all of simulcast stuff on ESPN, ESPN2, etc., but the main feed needs to be available to the masses.
I agree, CFB is the only major (even including hockey, not sure on mls) with the title game on cable right?

That number is pitiful for an exciting game with almost an exclusive window (there were only 3 NBA games and zero non low major CBB games)

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #61 on: January 12, 2016, 12:46:04 PM »
Beems is going to be pumped!

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16039
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #62 on: January 12, 2016, 12:51:29 PM »
If ESPN / ABC thought they would get significantly higher numbers by putting the NCG on network tv, they probably would have done so.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #63 on: January 12, 2016, 12:52:33 PM »
https://twitter.com/richarddeitsch/status/686951154475995136

The title game belongs on network TV. Do all of simulcast stuff on ESPN, ESPN2, etc., but the main feed needs to be available to the masses.
I agree, CFB is the only major (even including hockey, not sure on mls) with the title game on cable right?

That number is pitiful for an exciting game with almost an exclusive window (there were only 3 NBA games and zero non low major CBB games)

if you're too poor to be able to afford cable television, then you don't deserve to spend 3-4 hours watching a football game on espn


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18070
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #64 on: January 12, 2016, 12:53:26 PM »
https://twitter.com/richarddeitsch/status/686951154475995136

The title game belongs on network TV. Do all of simulcast stuff on ESPN, ESPN2, etc., but the main feed needs to be available to the masses.

Is the rating partially due to splitting viewers among 5 different channels?  After flipping through them I have a hard time believing many people watched anything other than the ESPN feed as most were hot garbage.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67452
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #65 on: January 12, 2016, 01:17:44 PM »
If ESPN / ABC thought they would get significantly higher numbers by putting the NCG on network tv, they probably would have done so.

They put it on espn because it bumps subscribers in an Era where they are losing people pretty quickly.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #66 on: January 12, 2016, 02:08:13 PM »
https://twitter.com/richarddeitsch/status/686951154475995136

The title game belongs on network TV. Do all of simulcast stuff on ESPN, ESPN2, etc., but the main feed needs to be available to the masses.

Is the rating partially due to splitting viewers among 5 different channels?  After flipping through them I have a hard time believing many people watched anything other than the ESPN feed as most were hot garbage.

https://twitter.com/richarddeitsch/status/686950487669760002

You would be correct, sir. ESPN goes through a lot of effort for that extra 0.2 in the ratings.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #67 on: January 12, 2016, 02:19:09 PM »
Don't have to like him, but Saban is one of the best ever. 5 titles in 11 years is crazy.
I bet with just three short years as HCIW at KSU Saban could learn how to win the right way and lead the Cats to some big time victories.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #68 on: January 12, 2016, 03:37:52 PM »
Winning the right way may just be the 17th goal (similar to the 12th man).

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #69 on: January 12, 2016, 04:04:38 PM »
If ESPN / ABC thought they would get significantly higher numbers by putting the NCG on network tv, they probably would have done so.

Of course it gets higher ratings if on network.

The question is what gets the highest combined rating:  Championship game on ESPN and something else (reality show?) on ABC  OR  championship game on ABC and something else (women's college basketball?) on ESPN.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #70 on: January 12, 2016, 04:09:58 PM »
The difference between the most meaningful regular season and a championship winner largely dictated by the choice of a committee.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile

Offline manpow5

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #72 on: January 14, 2016, 02:59:31 PM »


To EMAW or Not to EMAW

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #73 on: January 15, 2016, 10:25:41 AM »
Texas Tech owning Arkansas once again.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Official CFP Thread (2016 Edition)
« Reply #74 on: January 15, 2016, 01:11:46 PM »
Hot time in Kat town tonight.