Author Topic: Texas, more specifically Greg Abbott, hates your freedom, and the Constitution  (Read 5443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
So rough ridin' delusional :facepalm:

Edna, you are a libtard characiture
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 78264
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Ptolemy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 754
    • View Profile
I have a great deal of issue with them having the same Constitutional rights as a person.  Since the vast majority of corporations are closely held, the individuals controlling them don't need two voices.

WTF strawman arguments are you talking about?  See above.

Corps now have freedom of speech per Citizens UnitedYou want to deny a corporation the right to make a statement?

Corps now have religious beliefs transferred into them from their closely held owners per Burwell. No. Corporations have the right to say no to spending THEIR money on abortion drugs they morally object to.


Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
I have a great deal of issue with them having the same Constitutional rights as a person.  Since the vast majority of corporations are closely held, the individuals controlling them don't need two voices.

WTF strawman arguments are you talking about?  See above.

Corps now have freedom of speech per Citizens UnitedYou want to deny a corporation the right to make a statement?

Corps now have religious beliefs transferred into them from their closely held owners per Burwell. No. Corporations have the right to say no to spending THEIR money on abortion drugs they morally object to.

Who is morally objecting to the drugs? I think having morals is a trait of a person. :shrugs:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Governments aren't people and therefore shouldn't be able to determine what's illegal or immoral.
-chuck and edna, two intellectually bankrupt mongoloids
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9853
    • View Profile
I have a great deal of issue with them having the same Constitutional rights as a person.  Since the vast majority of corporations are closely held, the individuals controlling them don't need two voices.

WTF strawman arguments are you talking about?  See above.

Corps now have freedom of speech per Citizens UnitedYou want to deny a corporation the right to make a statement?

Corps now have religious beliefs transferred into them from their closely held owners per Burwell. No. Corporations have the right to say no to spending THEIR money on abortion drugs they morally object to.

LOL
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Online Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13177
    • View Profile
?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 35945
    • View Profile
?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

On the same day the senate passed a bill making juneteenth a federal holiday :lol: America, folks

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 41316
    • View Profile
The comparison  :lol: :lol:


Online Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13177
    • View Profile
?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 33494
    • View Profile
Alright, alright.

Online MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 35945
    • View Profile
?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :facepalm:

Online Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13177
    • View Profile
Now private companies in Texas can’t mandate vaccines.

?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 13651
  • Distinguished Scholar/Gentleman
    • View Profile
Now private companies in Texas can’t mandate vaccines.

?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A perfect addition to a very aptly titled thread. Texas has always been the stalking horse for testing out whether there's an appetite for completely reversing well-established Constitutional concepts. 

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2457
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Now private companies in Texas can’t mandate vaccines.

?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A perfect addition to a very aptly titled thread. Texas has always been the stalking horse for testing out whether there's an appetite for completely reversing well-established Constitutional concepts.

even when the answer is a resounding "no, there is no appetite for that" the response is 🙉

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 13651
  • Distinguished Scholar/Gentleman
    • View Profile
Now private companies in Texas can’t mandate vaccines.

?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A perfect addition to a very aptly titled thread. Texas has always been the stalking horse for testing out whether there's an appetite for completely reversing well-established Constitutional concepts.

even when the answer is a resounding "no, there is no appetite for that" the response is 🙉

But also, you miss 100% of the shots you don't take.