Vote or Die

[SkinnyBenny]

and explain your vote. Or don't. I dgaf.

[scottwildcat]

I voted no because I think there is still a better than 50% chance we either win out of Snyder doesn't retire.

[DQ12]

no -- he won't leave us like this.

[Cartierfor3]

I think yes but I hope no

[Rage Against the McKee]

I really hope it is.

[CHONGS]

be careful what you wish for

[420seriouscat69]

No. He'll coach our bowl game.

[Gooch]

No. He'll coach our bowl game.

We ain't winning out brah

[That_Guy]

I'm hoping yes, because Snyder should have already retired before the 'Cats became upon the downhill slope they're currently in. They're not going to win out and make a bowl game, and we'll continue to watch the shitty production put on the field by this staff and lack of talent roster next year if he does stay. We've already seen it once, and we will again. History repeats itself.

[That_Guy]

No. He'll coach our bowl game.

We ain't winning out brah

Wouldn't be surprised if we lose out, honestly. 

[Katpappy]

I'm hoping yes, because Snyder should have already retired before the 'Cats became upon the downhill slope they're currently in. They're not going to win out and make a bowl game, and we'll continue to watch the shitty production put on the field by this staff and lack of talent roster next year if he does stay. We've already seen it once, and we will again. History repeats itself.

Ya know he got in the same mess in '04.  He had a bunch of QB's, but none that were any good or ready to play.  I agree we will repeat next year, if he stays.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

[Katpappy]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

Not if Currie hires a new coach of his choosing.

[Gooch]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

This is a very frightening scenario.

[CHONGS]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

You mean a HCIW?

Not appealing at all...unless they can hoodwink some superstar into that terrible arrangement (which they can't and won't).

[Bqqkie Pimp]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

You mean a HCIW?

Not appealing at all...unless they can hoodwink some superstar into that terrible arrangement (which they can't and won't).

Not a fan of the term "HCIW", however for the plan I've heard of to work it would have to be somebody with enough respect for coach and passion for the program to allow Coach to stay on in title only for one season.

It's actually our best shot at a good transition as long as its not Sean or anybody currently on staff being elevated to HC.

[Gooch]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

You mean a HCIW?

Not appealing at all...unless they can hoodwink some superstar into that terrible arrangement (which they can't and won't).

Not a fan of the term "HCIW", however for the plan I've heard of to work it would have to be somebody with enough respect for coach and passion for the program to allow Coach to stay on in title only for one season.

It's actually our best shot at a good transition as long as its not Sean or anybody currently on staff being elevated to HC.

The only person that could possibly fit into a scenario like this that would not cause me to set fire to the stadium would be Venables.

[ChiComCat]

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

You mean a HCIW?

Not appealing at all...unless they can hoodwink some superstar into that terrible arrangement (which they can't and won't).

Not a fan of the term "HCIW", however for the plan I've heard of to work it would have to be somebody with enough respect for coach and passion for the program to allow Coach to stay on in title only for one season.

It's actually our best shot at a good transition as long as its not Sean or anybody currently on staff being elevated to HC.

Who would be a HCIW that doesn't suck?

[420seriouscat69]

Leavitt.

[Gooch]

Who would be a HCIW that doesn't suck?

The only person that could possibly fit into a scenario like this that would not cause me to set fire to the stadium would be Venables.

[Gooch]

Leavitt.

[catastrophe]

Venables is the obvious choice. We should have a new DC regardless of whether Snyder stays, and as long as he gets paid as a HC during said "HCIW" period, it's still an upgrade from his current job.

Also, a 12-month notice period is basically meaningless. That just means you have to pay Snyder for the next year regardless, then it's up to you whether he actually coaches or not.

[SkinnyBenny]

  I

The correct answer is "no". 

I have it on good authority that he has a 12 month notice in his contract. Plus, there is some validity to the behind the scenes workings of a new staff that would allow Coach to take a "victory lap" to fulfill his obligation and get to 200 wins.

Best case scenario is the announcement that '16 is the final year with a totally revamped staff that will go on past next year.

I actually kinda hope that's true, as long as it includes Venzy.  I really want to see him get 200. oddly enough, I probably care about it more than Bill. But again, if and only if this scenario brings Venzy. Which it won't.

[TownieCat]

He needs 10 more wins to get to 200. That may take more than just 2016...

[star seed 7]

Some of you dudes are real negative nathans