Author Topic: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?  (Read 8054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« on: May 15, 2015, 04:43:29 PM »
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/05/15/krauthammer_on_politicizing_amtrak_reflexive_answer_from_braindead_liberals_is_to_throw_more_money_at_it.html

Quote
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Well, I mean, Ray LaHood the former Transportation Secretary under Obama blamed it on crumbling infrastructure and of course we need more money. You know, how stupid do they think we are? This is a train going 102 miles per hour in a 50 mile zone. This is no crumbled problem. This is a speeding problem. This isn't an infrastructure problem. This is a personnel problem. But the knee jerk reflexive reaction of any Democrat of anything that happens in the country is throw more money at it.

You get the riots in Baltimore, reflexive answer is throw more money at the schools. You know Baltimore has a second highest spending of any urban area in America on schools and they're a disaster. You get hurricanes and tornadoes. When's the Democratic answer? Oh, that's global warming. Climate change. You need more windmills.

They have a single answer to everything. Raise your taxes, spend the money and the other thing that's really quite remarkable about this, only six years ago, not 100 years ago that the Democrats passed the largest infrastructure spending bill in the history of the galaxy. Even the Klingons never spent $380 billion on infrastructure to rebuild America. Remember the roads, the ports? The airports, the bridges. Where did that money go? But they're always at the trough again for more money for infrastructure. It shows a brain dead liberalism with no other answer to every other question.

Yup, that about sums it up.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2015, 05:52:48 PM »
Probably one of the most evil hearted people in america
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38081
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2015, 05:54:44 PM »
He looks very tightly wound.   I bet he flips crap super easy. 

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2015, 06:00:48 PM »
I think he usually has pretty thoughtful commentary.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2015, 06:18:28 PM »
Is anyone blaming a train wreck on republicans? I've only heard the usual persecution complex thing on the neocon am radio and nothing from actual people.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2015, 06:23:56 PM »
Our infrastructure really does suck. We should have trains that go faster than 100 mph and drive themselves. Either that, or stop funding Amtrak. It's a joke in its current state.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55964
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2015, 06:29:07 PM »
If a guy can drive a literal train full of people into a 50mph zone at 100mph in the year 2015, that's very much an infrastructure problem.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2015, 06:32:11 PM »
If a guy can drive a literal train full of people into a 50mph zone at 100mph in the year 2015, that's very much an infrastructure problem.

Yeah. It's tough to convince people with no engineering background that safety is important, though.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2015, 06:33:27 PM »
Our infrastructure really does suck. We should have trains that go faster than 100 mph and drive themselves. Either that, or stop funding Amtrak. It's a joke in it's current state.

We don't need subsidized trains hauling people. Just holding back real innovation like vacuum tubes or mag levs.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2015, 06:46:20 PM »
Our infrastructure really does suck. We should have trains that go faster than 100 mph and drive themselves. Either that, or stop funding Amtrak. It's a joke in it's current state.

We don't need subsidized trains hauling people. Just holding back real innovation like vacuum tubes or mag levs.

We don't need trains that can't go faster than 50 mph, anyway. I agree.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22868
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2015, 07:05:45 PM »
does puni's kraut#acker thread count?
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2015, 07:47:17 PM »
does puni's kraut#acker thread count?

I think so, yes.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2015, 08:33:50 PM »
that 380 billion or whatever was laughably low, infrastructure projects cost an insane amount of money
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2015, 10:12:41 PM »
that 380 billion or whatever was laughably low, infrastructure projects cost an insane amount of money

380 billion. "Laughably low." :lol: I guess when you accept a trillion dollar annual deficit, hundreds of billions is just chump change, really. Libtards. :lol: :facepalm:
« Last Edit: May 15, 2015, 10:42:02 PM by K-S-U-Wildcats! »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2015, 10:36:54 PM »
Ksuw loves having a crumbling infrastructure, very weird
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2015, 10:43:26 PM »
Ksuw loves having a crumbling infrastructure, very weird

The majority of infrastructure is the responsibility of local governments, which are being bankrupted by government employee unions.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2015, 10:46:13 PM »
The obvious solution is to cut taxes on the rich
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2015, 10:47:27 PM »
Ksuw loves having a crumbling infrastructure, very weird

No no I totally agree with you. 380 billion is just a laughable amount.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2015, 10:49:23 PM »
380 billion is about what kansas needs, so I guess just eff off rest of the US
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2015, 11:07:28 PM »
Ksuw loves having a crumbling infrastructure, very weird

The majority of infrastructure is the responsibility of local governments, which are being bankrupted by government employee unions.

The US owns a large number of dams, lakes, highways, etc that are not properly maintained due to lack of funding. We should be spending a lot more on infrastructure. I don't believe setting up a grant fund for shovel-ready projects is a very efficient way to do that, though.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2015, 11:05:07 AM »
No one is saying infrastructure isn't important, or doesn't need funding.   I'm all for lots of infrastructure projects, but that doesn't change the facts that billions of taxpayer dollars are poured into infrastructure every year in a very inefficient way. 

The White House has blamed Republicans for the train wreck.   Yet that that doesn't change the fact that you've got a Congress and a Federal Government running another massive money loser, and it's been that way for years.   Who is to say that if Congress and bureaucrats didn't have their fingers all over Amtrak then a speed control system may have already been installed. 

But for most (particularly ProgLibs) it's NEVER a management problem, and always a money problem.

Obama has cut maintenance funding through sequestration and his response was to set up a huge pot of money for state and local governments to apply for for shovel-ready projects. So not only does the Federal Gov own projects that it's letting fall into disrepair, but it's creating overhead costs on projects it doesn't even own.

I don't think Krauthammer was saying that, though.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2015, 11:06:37 AM »
If a guy can drive a literal train full of people into a 50mph zone at 100mph in the year 2015, that's very much an infrastructure problem.

Wut?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2015, 11:07:55 AM »
If a guy can drive a literal train full of people into a 50mph zone at 100mph in the year 2015, that's very much an infrastructure problem.

Wut?

The train should have slowed itself down.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2015, 11:08:19 AM »
Is anyone blaming a train wreck on republicans? I've only heard the usual persecution complex thing on the neocon am radio and nothing from actual people.

A lot of democrats did.

The fact that libtards think passenger trains are the future of transportation is a hilarious indictment on how backward thinking libtards are.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Do we have a Charles Krauthammer thread?
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2015, 11:09:47 AM »
If a guy can drive a literal train full of people into a 50mph zone at 100mph in the year 2015, that's very much an infrastructure problem.

Wut?

The train should have slowed itself down.

That's a libtard "you can't replace jobs with technology" thing, not an infrastructure thing.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd