Thread to keep dax updated on neocon am radio

[star seed 7]

Thinks NASA is lying 

[star seed 7]

Using Mars to scaremonger climate change

[Tobias]

[star seed 7]

Sorry folks, I'm not buying any of it and neither should you

[star seed 7]

NASA is "dangerously incompetent" and "hideous"

[star seed 7]

Now on to the pope's agenda 

[CNS]

Going to just plug The Pope in where he just had NASA, right?

[star seed 7]

There is a leftist liberal mafia of Cardinals who want to modernize the church and this pope is their puppet

[star seed 7]

Doubling down on the Mars thing 

[star seed 7]

Thinks the movie "the martian" is climate change propaganda because there is a bad storm on Mars (spoiler alert)

[star seed 7]

Why do climate change people never predict the climate next year or two years away, why is it always 30 years? 50 years?

[star seed 7]

He's just whipping those highfalutin "scientists" ass today

[Tobias]

amazing

[star seed 7]

So yesterday we have this big announcement that they've found flowing water on Mars and that two-thirds of the planet used to be an ocean, two-thirds of the northern hemisphere used to be an ocean, it was a mile deep.  I raised a question.  How do we know this?  Have we probed a mile deep?  We know that there's always been water on Mars because they have ice caps on the poles.  So it's not news that there's water.  That's why they said free flowing water.  But that wasn't the big deal. The big deal was that some scientist -- and it was important to call the guy a scientist -- some scientist said that a catastrophic event probably related to climate change on Mars, resulted in this.

I'm sorry, folks, but that's not science, and that's not even a good wild guess.  How can there be a catastrophic event on Mars when there is nobody there to experience the catastrophe?  How can there be a catastrophe on Mars when we can't even prove it?  All we can do is wild guess it?  And the very fact that my objection to this is being noted is proof positive that there is an agenda attached to this, otherwise they would leave my comments alone.  There is an agenda attached to it and they've got to try to discredit anyone -- in this case, me -- who is attempting to attach whatever they're doing with Mars and the news they're reporting to the Democrat leftist agenda, which of course is climate change.

And I predicted yesterday that it would not be very long before we would see evidence that my reaction and take on all this is accurate. And, lo and behold, right here my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.  This is from Yahoo News, even, the Millennial news network. "Did NASA Time its Mars Announcement to Coincide with 'The Martian'?" a movie starring Matt Damon.

"NASA's announcement confirming that it found evidence of water flowing on the surface Mars," not now, but many, many moons ago, or I should perhaps say many, many Marss ago,  "was celebrated by scientists searching for life in the universe -- and by publicists at 20th Century Fox looking to promote 'The Martian,' the upcoming Ridley Scott film starring Matt Damon. In the film, Damon plays Mark Watney, an astronaut who must survive alone on Mars after being left for dead by his crew during a fierce storm on the red planet."

What do you bet in this movie that fierce storm is related to climate change?  I haven't seen the movie.  But here's the thing.  I don't think so much NASA was -- well, they might be timing the release of the news to support the movie.  Actually, it's probably true.  But more than that, NASA wants to go to Mars, and Obama's turned NASA over to Muslim outreach, in case you've forgotten.  NASA wants the money to go to Mars.  It makes total sense in the world that they would time, NASA, the release of, "Look what we found! We found flowing water on Mars, oh, my God, there could be life, oh, my God, we gotta go, we gotta go, we gotta go."

And here comes the movie, they throw in climate change relationships just for a little dot the I, cross the T, and magic happens.  (interruption)  You think people don't know?  Snerdley is telling me that some of you may not know that when I mentioned NASA was converted to Muslim outreach by Obama that you might be turning the radio up or scratching your heads.  No, he did.  One of the first things he did when he assumed office in 2009 was to convert NASA's budget and the use of that money into Muslim outreach.

Anyway, NASA's been converted to Muslim outreach.  They want to go back to Mars.  Hell, that's fine.  I'm not opposed to going to Mars.  I'm big on exploring.  The problem is everything that Obama touches has been corrupted, and by "corrupted" I mean it's been converted to liberalism.  Everything that exists here exists for the purpose of advancing the Obama agenda.  And something as innocuous... This is my way of attempting to educate and inform.

Something as innocuous as this supposed discovery on Mars can be converted to this, and it has been, and it is.  I'm simply trying to alert people to be on the lookout for it so they can maybe resist it.  I'm sorry. You know, I'm the mayor of Realville.  And some scientist who's never been to Mars, who's never gonna go to Mars. All we've got's a couple rovers up there and our telescopes and so forth. We haven't the slightest idea what's ever happened on Mars. But this guy stands at the podium wearing his official NASA lab coat, with his official NASA business card.

And he says, "Yep, yep, free-flowing water up there on Mars!  Brilliant, great discovery. Uh, two-thirds of the northern hemisphere used to be an ocean a mile deep but it's not there anymore because of a catastrophic event probably related to climate change."  And they tell us this is science.  There isn't science in any of that, and that's exactly what I said yesterday, and these people at Politico and at Dallas and the local TV news, I'm sure, are clueless what I really said.  And those sound bites are coming up.

One more thing about life on Mars and water. Folks, you know, the... (laughing) I'm sorry, I can't help myself.  This quest for life elsewhere in the universe, it's understandable.  "We don't want to feel we're alone." I understand that.  We don't want to feel like all there is is us on this blue marble.  "There has to be something out there!"  But if there is, it is automatic that it's much more advanced than we are.  Whatever life forms are out there are smarter than we are.

They may have even been here a long time ago, built the pyramids, and then figured out this planet doesn't have what they need to survive, so they left.  They did Stonehenge, they built the pyramids and then they gave up. They said, "This place?" They ran into humanity and said, "Ah, this is crazy," and left.  The point is that every one of these assumptions on alien life is predicated on the fact that we're primitive, that we're murderous and self-destructive, and there are far more advanced civilizations in the universe, and, "Oh, God, would they please contact us!"

So we got movies from Spielberg like... I don't know. Whatever the name of it was.  (interruption)  No, not ET. Not ET, but the one where the aliens actually land in some guy's backyard out in Arizona or Colorado somewhere and played musical tones (humming). It was like Jeopardy, like watching... (interruption) That's right, Close Encounters of the Third Kind.  Anyway, water might be a necessary condition for life as we know it, but -- and here I'm going to get technical and beyond the ability to understand those at Media Matters and elsewhere in the Drive-By Media.

Because once you start talking about human life, to them it starts and ends with abortion, and I'm going much, much deeper than that.  If you want to start talking about the conditions necessary for life on Mars or anywhere else, yeah. Water, without question is a necessary condition.  But it isn't sufficient.  Meaning, it's not enough for there to be life.  What begets life?  Serious question.  Above and beyond... I'm not speaking about creation or any of that.  We know the biblical explanation for life.  But beyond that, I mean, what sustains life, what creates life, where does life come from?  Does it come from water?

No.

Well, then where does it come from?

(interruption) Yes, we can.  Yeah, most certainly we can.  Life begets life. (interruption) Well, but I'm going beyond the creation.  I'm assuming... I believe in the God of creation.  But beyond that, how does life sustain itself?  Life begets life. My point is just because you discovered water on Mars does not mean there's life there. It does not mean there ever has been life there because water does not create life.  Life begets life.  An organism begets itself. Human beings create more human beings, but water... If that's all it took, we wouldn't need to have illegal immigration. We could just go get some Democrat voters out of the Pacific Ocean.

Water does not create life.  And if you want to think that all you need for life is water, and they found free-flowing water on Mars... Well, they haven't, by the way.  They think they found evidence of it.  Well, if that can satisfy your scientific requirement for the existence of life, well, I can't change your mind.  The idea that Mars once had an ocean is pure speculation, a total wild guess.  No one knows. But let's assume for a moment that the NASA guy with his official NASA scientist white lab coat is right.  Let's say that there was once an ocean on Mars.

Where did it go?  Where? That's a lot of water.  You have two-thirds of the northern hemisphere of Mars covered by water, it's a mile deep.  Where did it go?  It can't escape into space.  You know why?  It's called gravity.  And the atmosphere would keep it there as well.  So if there was once all that water on Mars, and there is a lot of water here on earth, what's gonna happen to our ocean?  Is the same thing gonna happen?  Is it gonna vanish?  How did the water vanish?

My point is, they're presenting all this stuff to you as fact just like they're presenting everything involving global warming as scientific fact.  It's nothing but wild guesses.  It's nothing but based on computer models, which is the result of data input that who knows if it's legit or not.  And where you did it on climate change, global warming.  Have you ever heard a forecast for next year on the climate?  Have you ever heard a forecast for 2018 on the climate?

Why do you only hear forecasts for the next 30 years, 50, or a hundred years?  Did you ever ask yourself that?  These brilliant pro-global climate change people, man-made, come out and they're constantly trying to scare the pants off everybody with these predictions of doom, gloom, apocalypse or whatever else. But it's always 30 years down the road.  Even in 1980 it was 20 years down the road. We've long gone past the first predictions that predicted doom, and they were dead wrong.  Why do they still have any credibility?

My only point here is -- and this is inarguable, as far as I'm concerned. There's nobody that could change my mind on this.  And it's not because my mind is closed; it's because I'm right, and it is this.  Whenever you have a scientist talking about a "catastrophic event" on Mars brought about -- "likely brought about" -- by climate change, that's all I need to hear to tell me we have somebody who is either actively involved or has himself been co-opted and is unaware of it by a leftist agenda that is related to the effort to push this whole notion of man-made climate change on earth.

And there's only one reason to push that agenda, and it isn't to save the earth.  It's to coalesce power in as many or as few places as possible.  It's just Big Government 101.  The good news is, folks... I mean, if you want to look at it in this way, the good news is that none of the other planets have Common Core.  We're the only one that has Common Core.  None of the other planets' education systems have been corrupted yet. 

images sprinkled in:






truly bitb

[Tobias]

this is absolutely, 100% the best thing I have ever read before.  holy hell, there aren't enough *like*s on our blue marble for this one

[star seed 7]

i love how he meanders into abortion, muslims, etc.  there was a few minutes about putin that i cut out in the middle.

[Cartierfor3]

i read the martian, and if anything, its against beauacracy and government control and about individualism.

[Cartierfor3]

how do you get those transcripts lib7

[star seed 7]

our good friend cat27 introduced me to the www.rushimg.com website

[Tobias]

he posts them now - http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/09/29/what_i_really_think_about_mars and it's absolutely amazing

[star seed 7]

the banner pictures crack me up

[Tobias]

[Cartierfor3]

that's pretty funny. guys, can we take a second and just pour one out for me? its tough being a conservative when the main voices repping our cause are so stupid.

i mean, imagine the biggest voice of the liberal cause was like, i dunno, flavor flav or something. you feel me lib7 and 'bias?

[Tobias]

the banner pictures crack me up

that's his pre-sexy time look

[star seed 7]