12 or 14 members would absolutely be worse
I think 12 members with 2 of them being shitty schools scraped off the Pac 12 or some faraway school would be worse than the current 10 team round robin. But, i think it would be preferable to the whatever dogshit format they come up with for a 10 team conference division format.
If we're going to have a championship i'd prefer 6 team divisions. Anyone turning up their noses at the Arizona schools is insane imo.
I'm certainly not turning my nose up, but I think staying at 10 might better. I simply have no doubt the playoffs will at some point expand to 8 teams. Once they do, the Big 12 will auto qualify. If you believe the playoffs will expand, then we absolutely should not be in a hurry to expand unless a slam dunk value add team is willing to come on board.
Well if it goes to 8 there will still be two at large teams for which each of the five P5 conferences will lobby.
Correct, and you can probably grant the SEC a second team most years, so now you're down to 1. You have to look no further than two years ago and the Big12 would have had 2 teams in under that scenario.
At 12 or 14 teams, we'd be guaranteed 7-8% of the conference in the playoffs, with a chance at 16 or 14%.
At 10 team, guaranteed 10% with a chance for 20% of the conference in.
I recognize the hard part is determining how often that second gets in w/ 10 teams vs a larger quantity of teams and then justifying the loss of profit due to smaller pie slices per team. My gut says stay at 10 unless you hit a homerun with teams like FSU.