Author Topic: Weed  (Read 20151 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 48364
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #450 on: September 19, 2018, 03:06:04 PM »
Coke is getting into the cbd drink game
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline wetwillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20353
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #451 on: September 19, 2018, 03:22:31 PM »
Kind of full circle for cocaine cola
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 48364
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #452 on: October 09, 2018, 06:53:12 PM »
https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/missouri-has-three-legalization-measures-two-are-very-odd

Quote
Amendment 3
All of this looks even more straightforward in comparison to Amendment 3, which was hatched by a Springfield attorney and physician named Brad Bradshaw.

His proposal, nicknamed the Bradshaw Amendment, would funnel the haul from its eye-popping 15% tax into the creation of a research institute that would aim to “develop cures for cancer and other incurable diseases or medical conditions.”

Bradshaw wrote the amendment. Bradshaw picked up the million-plus-dollar tab to put the measure on the ballot and advertise it. And Bradshaw stands to be the prime beneficiary if it passes, by appointing himself the head of the facility that would rake in revenues of around $66 million, according to the Missouri Secretary of State’s office.

If that strikes you as a touch bombastic, you’re not off the mark: In one of his video advertisements, Bradshaw appears in an operating room in scrubs, equating his proposed research facility to the projects that put a man on the moon and built the atomic bomb.

Amendment 3, in other words, is the marijuana-policy equivalent of a vanity plate.

 :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 48364
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #453 on: October 09, 2018, 06:59:13 PM »
TLDR, vote amendment 2 if you vote in missouri  :shy:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #454 on: October 09, 2018, 08:53:45 PM »
66 million for a research institute in the middle of bum-eff missouri? that's cute.

Online libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 48364
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #455 on: October 09, 2018, 09:13:35 PM »
The 66 million is from a 15% medical marijuana tax
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6927
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #456 on: October 09, 2018, 09:52:55 PM »
https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/missouri-has-three-legalization-measures-two-are-very-odd

Quote
Amendment 3
All of this looks even more straightforward in comparison to Amendment 3, which was hatched by a Springfield attorney and physician named Brad Bradshaw.

His proposal, nicknamed the Bradshaw Amendment, would funnel the haul from its eye-popping 15% tax into the creation of a research institute that would aim to “develop cures for cancer and other incurable diseases or medical conditions.”

Bradshaw wrote the amendment. Bradshaw picked up the million-plus-dollar tab to put the measure on the ballot and advertise it. And Bradshaw stands to be the prime beneficiary if it passes, by appointing himself the head of the facility that would rake in revenues of around $66 million, according to the Missouri Secretary of State’s office.

If that strikes you as a touch bombastic, you’re not off the mark: In one of his video advertisements, Bradshaw appears in an operating room in scrubs, equating his proposed research facility to the projects that put a man on the moon and built the atomic bomb.

Amendment 3, in other words, is the marijuana-policy equivalent of a vanity plate.

 :lol:

Very Al Gore carbon credity proposition.

Online libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 48364
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #457 on: October 09, 2018, 10:12:07 PM »
Interesting, if accurate
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #458 on: October 09, 2018, 10:24:40 PM »
The 66 million is from a 15% medical marijuana tax

Done right, a non-profit biomedical research institute will need > $300 million just to get started.

Online libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 48364
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #459 on: October 09, 2018, 10:32:31 PM »
This one is big stuff tho
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5970
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #460 on: October 10, 2018, 06:59:16 AM »
Them HoNucks up north just legalized pot nationwide.
Cannabis Canada.
Stupid move.
Gonna ruin Colorado.
Renonese people against such actions.
Democrats.  Favor this, and you take over.

Offline Matt Mckee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9855
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #461 on: October 10, 2018, 07:39:05 AM »
Is that a haiku?

Offline Cat from DC

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2290
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, btc, ltc, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #462 on: October 17, 2018, 08:32:57 PM »
Officially legal in America’s hat

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 16379
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #463 on: October 17, 2018, 10:53:22 PM »
What does that mean for the people imprisoned because of it?

Offline mhkpasa

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1414
  • Let's go get a couple bowls of loudmouth soup
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #464 on: October 18, 2018, 09:08:45 AM »
What does that mean for the people imprisoned because of it?

I thought i read amnesty for anyone imprisoned for amounts of 30 grams or less.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 16379
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #465 on: October 18, 2018, 01:39:01 PM »
So one oz? Jesus.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14889
  • Gucci Mane Book Reader
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #466 on: January 04, 2019, 03:07:57 PM »
Stud


Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 66128
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #467 on: January 04, 2019, 03:11:06 PM »
lmao

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 66128
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #468 on: January 12, 2019, 07:30:23 AM »
I bought an assload of cbd gummies for hangover relief and other medicinal purposes such as not feeling like I want to die from booze enjoyment, my eyes hurting from looking out of just one of them at a time, etc.

grade: B. You still don't feel 100% but you feel quite a bit better.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14889
  • Gucci Mane Book Reader
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #469 on: January 12, 2019, 08:08:47 AM »
We were in Colorado over the summer. I mailed myself like $150 worth of edibles. I haven't yet tried them. My wife stashed them somewhere after we returned home. Just last night at dinner, she informed me that she now has no idea where they are.  :lol:

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 66128
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #470 on: January 12, 2019, 08:59:27 AM »
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Katdaddy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8272
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #471 on: January 12, 2019, 01:55:31 PM »
We were in Colorado over the summer. I mailed myself like $150 worth of edibles. I haven't yet tried them. My wife stashed them somewhere after we returned home. Just last night at dinner, she informed me that she now has no idea where they are.  :lol:


You'll never see them again, Chum.  My wife did the same thing to all our sex toys.  :cry:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Chingon

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 14602
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Weed
« Reply #472 on: January 12, 2019, 02:10:57 PM »
We were in Colorado over the summer. I mailed myself like $150 worth of edibles. I haven't yet tried them. My wife stashed them somewhere after we returned home. Just last night at dinner, she informed me that she now has no idea where they are. 


You'll never see them again, Chum.  My wife did the same thing to all our sex toys.  :cry:
I know where they are...

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5322
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #473 on: January 12, 2019, 02:16:02 PM »
 :lol:

Offline Katdaddy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8272
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Weed
« Reply #474 on: January 12, 2019, 09:52:31 PM »
We were in Colorado over the summer. I mailed myself like $150 worth of edibles. I haven't yet tried them. My wife stashed them somewhere after we returned home. Just last night at dinner, she informed me that she now has no idea where they are. 


You'll never see them again, Chum.  My wife did the same thing to all our sex toys.  :cry:
I know where they are...


The edibles' or the toys.   :dunno:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.