post here when someone decides to run for president in 2016

[Mr Bread]

Get a Michelin Guide, rape baby. 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Get a thesaurus, fuckface.

Why don't pull one out of your ass and look up propagates, you rough ridin' loser. It's completely unnecessary to pretend that those comments aren't true. To pretend it is bigotry is to claim the statement "rich white farmers in south traditionally owned slaves" is racist. It's not and it's true.

Like I said, these people are incapable of any kind of independent thought, critical thinking and in many cases (like this one) dont even possess the cognitive skills of a household plant. So pathetic.

[puniraptor]

Get a To Catch a Mockingbird, Boo Radley

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Oh my god, rand said that homosexuals are different than heterosexuals. rough ridin' crazy bigot. Then he said gay marriage is new on the scene. What!?!? That's the same as trying to cure homosexuality with electroshock therapy. It's monstrous.

Get a rough ridin' clue, mouth breathing lemmings.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I'm going to fire up a letter to Houghton Mifflin for publishing a biology book that distinguishes between homosexuality and heterosexuality because that's rough ridin' bigoted. Then I'm going to finish rough ridin' my donkey and huffing gasoline, because that's what stupid rough ridin' hillbilly trash does.

Get learned, river trash

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

BOOYAH

[michigancat]

he didn't just say the types of marriage were different, he said gay marriage offends him and that a moral crisis makes people think gay marriage is OK.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rand-paul-moral-crisis-gay-marraige-revival

[Mr Bread]

Oh my god, rand said that homosexuals are different than heterosexuals. rough ridin' crazy bigot. Then he said gay marriage is new on the scene. What!?!? That's the same as trying to cure homosexuality with electroshock therapy. It's monstrous.

Get a rough ridin' clue, mouth breathing lemmings.

   You're trying to cheat.  I understand why, but don't. 

gay marriage is different than straight marriage

Is it different because of dueling peens or on account of the scissoring?  The way they have sex defines the nature of the marriage?  Seems like other than that it's the same.  Pretty simple-minded to distill a loving and committed relationship between two adults down to the way they like to eff. 

What if they're old and don't really eff anymore, can they get married then? 

[Mr Bread]

Get a thesaurus, fuckface.

Why don't pull one out of your ass and look up propagates, you rough ridin' loser.

synonyms:
bear, beget, engender, father, generate, grow, increase, mother, multiply, originate

 

[Mr Bread]

he didn't just say the types of marriage were different, he said gay marriage offends him and that a moral crisis makes people think gay marriage is OK.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rand-paul-moral-crisis-gay-marraige-revival

Get a Roberto Bolano novel, slutbreath.  It's not Adam and Steve.

[michigancat]

he didn't just say the types of marriage were different, he said gay marriage offends him and that a moral crisis makes people think gay marriage is OK.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rand-paul-moral-crisis-gay-marraige-revival

Get a Roberto Bolano novel, slutbreath.  It's not Adam and Steve.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Oh my god, rand said that homosexuals are different than heterosexuals. rough ridin' crazy bigot. Then he said gay marriage is new on the scene. What!?!? That's the same as trying to cure homosexuality with electroshock therapy. It's monstrous.

Get a rough ridin' clue, mouth breathing lemmings.

   You're trying to cheat.  I understand why, but don't. 

gay marriage is different than straight marriage

Is it different because of dueling peens or on account of the scissoring?  The way they have sex defines the nature of the marriage?  Seems like other than that it's the same.  Pretty simple-minded to distill a loving and committed relationship between two adults down to the way they like to eff. 

What if they're old and don't really eff anymore, can they get married then?

It's different because it's not the same. To what degree they're different doesn't make them anymore the same. Regardless,  it's really rough ridin' stupid that any two people have to apply to the state and pay money to obtain a license to be married. Get rid of that, it's idiotic.

If rand is a bigot for his personal views regarding the morality of gay marriage, then nearly every elected politician is a bigot. And you and michigancat have voted for a shitload of them.

[puniraptor]

Rubio needs to keep his haircut fresh. He looks dweeb when it grows out.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Conflating morality to bigotry or policy doesn't do a lot to dissuade me that ya'll aren't a collection of slobbering morons parroting angry talking points. Regardless of how he gets there (freedom to contract contra civil right), he favors gay marriage.

[MakeItRain]

Conflating morality to bigotry or policy doesn't do a lot to dissuade me that ya'll aren't a collection of slobbering morons parroting angry talking points. Regardless of how he gets there (freedom to contract contra civil right), he favors gay marriage.

What the eff? I gave you two quotes and rusty gave you another quote that directly states that he doesn't favor gay marriage. We are ahving this conversation because he has unequivocally stated he doesn't favor gay marriage. Are you real?

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

[michigancat]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

gay haters (republicans) never propose that though

[Dugout DickStone]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

Works for me

[Rage Against the McKee]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

That works. Issuing marriage licenses to gay couples works, too. So I wouldn't say that's the only answer.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

That works. Issuing marriage licenses to gay couples works, too. So I wouldn't say that's the only answer.

The reason I put marriage in quotes is because the word connotates a religious ceremony. Some religious people want to keep the sanctity of that word, which they say is defined in the bible as between a man and a woman. Some gay people are unwilling to compromise on this point and insist on being "married".

[Rage Against the McKee]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

That works. Issuing marriage licenses to gay couples works, too. So I wouldn't say that's the only answer.

The reason I put marriage in quotes is because the word conotates a religious ceremony. Some religious people want to keep the sanctity of that word, which they say is defined in the bible as between a man and a woman. Some gay people are unwilling to compromise on this point and insist on being "married".

I can't say that I blame them, considering that when you are married you get all of the benefits that come with it, and when you are "unioned" or whatever you call it, you get a piece of paper and nothing else.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

That works. Issuing marriage licenses to gay couples works, too. So I wouldn't say that's the only answer.

The reason I put marriage in quotes is because the word conotates a religious ceremony. Some religious people want to keep the sanctity of that word, which they say is defined in the bible as between a man and a woman. Some gay people are unwilling to compromise on this point and insist on being "married".

I can't say that I blame them, considering that when you are married you get all of the benefits that come with it, and when you are "unioned" or whatever you call it, you get a piece of paper and nothing else.

Yes, it depends on which state you're in, and the IRS is still not giving equal rights to domestic partnerships.

It would be a great platform addition for a candidate to take up. It would preserve the word marriage and give equal rights to gay couples.

[michigancat]

The only real answer to this is to eliminate "marriage" licenses and replace them with partnership contracts. If a couple wants to have a religious marriage ceremony, go for it, but it will be meaningless to the government. A partnership contract can be between any two or more humans that agree to share all income, debt, and tax liability.

That works. Issuing marriage licenses to gay couples works, too. So I wouldn't say that's the only answer.

The reason I put marriage in quotes is because the word conotates a religious ceremony. Some religious people want to keep the sanctity of that word, which they say is defined in the bible as between a man and a woman. Some gay people are unwilling to compromise on this point and insist on being "married".

I can't say that I blame them, considering that when you are married you get all of the benefits that come with it, and when you are "unioned" or whatever you call it, you get a piece of paper and nothing else.

Yes, it depends on which state you're in, and the IRS is still not giving equal rights to domestic partnerships.

It would be a great platform addition for a candidate to take up. It would preserve the word marriage and give equal rights to gay couples.

wouldn't fly with the base, they don't care about the word marriage, just hating on gays.

[star seed 7]

Lol at the neocons accepting that 

[star seed 7]

https://twitter.com/kibblesmith/status/587644010128367616