Author Topic: post here when someone decides to run for president in 2016 (Read 71034 times)

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #325 on:** March 30, 2015, 10:01:04 AM »

Also, Obama has already successfully been elected President of the United States twice. That trumps Cruz, given that is also his career goal.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #326 on:** March 30, 2015, 10:04:48 AM »

Again, I'm not calling Obama a loser. He is many things, but not that. And I'm also not belittling being elected to EIC of the Harvard Law Review. I just don't think it is as significant a legal accomplishment as what Cruz did.

CNS · « **Reply #327 on:** March 30, 2015, 10:49:16 AM »

Can we agree the both are accomplished ppl yet still make no distinguishable difference other than stirring up stupidity via political dumbassery?

star seed 7 · « **Reply #328 on:** March 30, 2015, 11:57:18 AM »

Ksuw with a "cruz does things the right way" post

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #329 on:** March 30, 2015, 01:03:05 PM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 30, 2015, 10:04:48 AM

Again, I'm not calling Obama a loser. He is many things, but not that. And I'm also not belittling being elected to EIC of the Harvard Law Review. I just don't think it is as significant a legal accomplishment as what Cruz did.

If he can't get himself elected to the EIC of Law Review, not sure I want him being my party's nominee.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #330 on:** April 03, 2015, 12:41:45 PM »

Rand Paul hasn't even announced his candidacy yet, and he's already got his first major endorsement. http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/04/03/rand-paul-has-j-c-watts-in-his-corner/?_r=0

Watts was such a stud, too bad he retired.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #331 on:** April 03, 2015, 05:10:03 PM »

Paul is going to go up in flames.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #332 on:** April 03, 2015, 06:16:29 PM »

Quote from: Kat Kid on April 03, 2015, 05:10:03 PM

Paul is going to go up in flames.

Sounds cool.

For someone who pretends to be a critical thinker, I would think you'd be fascinated by a contrarian (relatively speaking) like Paul. But then I remember you're just a leftist shill and a "whoever is marked D" lemming.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #333 on:** April 03, 2015, 07:08:13 PM »

Rand Paul has pretty much exactly the same foreign policy views as the rest of the field. Which are pretty much the same views as Clinton. it will be a miserable election.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #334 on:** April 06, 2015, 08:57:49 PM »

ACTUAL STUD BOSS

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DFB-22722

star seed 7 · « **Reply #335 on:** April 06, 2015, 09:01:36 PM »

wonder how much he paid for someone to fill it out

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #336 on:** April 06, 2015, 09:26:57 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on April 06, 2015, 09:01:36 PM

wonder how much he paid for someone to fill it out

Hopefully he E-Verified them first.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #337 on:** April 07, 2015, 08:50:50 AM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 06, 2015, 08:57:49 PM

ACTUAL STUD BOSS

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DFB-22722

Man, just imagine if America had elected a competent, conservative president in 2012... Well, we mumped that up. Back to reality.

Institutional Control · « **Reply #338 on:** April 07, 2015, 08:53:55 AM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 07, 2015, 08:50:50 AM

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 06, 2015, 08:57:49 PM
ACTUAL STUD BOSS

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DFB-22722

Man, just imagine if America had elected a competent, conservative president in 2012... Well, we mumped that up. Back to reality.

Too bad there wasn't one running.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #339 on:** April 07, 2015, 09:09:35 AM »

Quote from: Batt BcKee on April 07, 2015, 08:53:55 AM

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 07, 2015, 08:50:50 AM
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 06, 2015, 08:57:49 PM
ACTUAL STUD BOSS

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DFB-22722

Man, just imagine if America had elected a competent, conservative president in 2012... Well, we mumped that up. Back to reality.

Too bad there wasn't one running.

Well that's pretty silly. Romney was. That's who we're talking about.

Institutional Control · « **Reply #340 on:** April 07, 2015, 09:18:34 AM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 07, 2015, 09:09:35 AM

Quote from: Batt BcKee on April 07, 2015, 08:53:55 AM
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on April 07, 2015, 08:50:50 AM
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 06, 2015, 08:57:49 PM
ACTUAL STUD BOSS

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DFB-22722

Man, just imagine if America had elected a competent, conservative president in 2012... Well, we mumped that up. Back to reality.

Too bad there wasn't one running.

Well that's pretty silly. Romney was. That's who we're talking about.

Romney is the Republican equivalent to John Kerry.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #341 on:** April 07, 2015, 09:36:21 AM »

Rand Paul

The choice everyone can agree upon. Socially liberal, fiscally conservative, war dove.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #342 on:** April 07, 2015, 09:37:04 AM »

Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on April 06, 2015, 09:26:57 PM

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on April 06, 2015, 09:01:36 PM
wonder how much he paid for someone to fill it out

Hopefully he E-Verified them first.

#jobcreator

renocat · « **Reply #343 on:** April 07, 2015, 02:13:34 PM »

Rand Paul another egomaniac buttshine running for president, the bright sunshine of truth and hope saying from his butt and illuminating the way for near sighted tea baggers. The man has never led anything, no lengthy political rrecord to examine, issue flopper (wanted to cut defense now he wants to increase it) and IMO naive about foreign policy. Sounds like reverse Obama.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #344 on:** April 07, 2015, 02:22:36 PM »

Quote from: renocat on April 07, 2015, 02:13:34 PM

Barack Obama another egomaniac buttshine running for president, the bright sunshine of truth and hope saying from his butt and illuminating the way for near sighted leftists and morons. The man has never led anything, no lengthy political rrecord to examine, issue flopper (wanted to cut defense now he wants to increase it) and IMO naive about foreign policy.

Actually nails it

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #345 on:** April 07, 2015, 02:28:14 PM »

Something rubs me the wrong way about Paul. I don't like his voice or speaking style. But on a more substantive basis, I don't think he can possibly hold together the coalition of libertarians, tea party, isolationists, social conservatives, and neocons he's aiming for. He needs the social conservatives and neocons, but I just don't see them getting on board. That would be a disaster worse than what happened to Romney. Thus, if I had to choose between Cruz and Paul, Cruz is more electable because he hasn't gone so far out on the libertarian/isolationist wing.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #346 on:** April 07, 2015, 05:54:01 PM »

Cruz has the potential to be a very formidable candidate. He has pissed off a number of important people in the Republican Party tho.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #347 on:** April 10, 2015, 12:20:31 AM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 07, 2015, 09:36:21 AM

Rand Paul

The choice everyone can agree upon. Socially liberal , fiscally conservative, war dove.

WTF?

Two Randall Paul hottakes

1. He is in no way, shape, or form a libertarian. People should stop helping him falsely market himself to dumb people.
2. Randall is a bigot and anyone who supports him is a bigot too.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #348 on:** April 13, 2015, 10:10:13 AM »

Rubio is in

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #349 on:** April 13, 2015, 11:27:45 AM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on April 10, 2015, 12:20:31 AM

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 07, 2015, 09:36:21 AM
Rand Paul

The choice everyone can agree upon. Socially liberal , fiscally conservative, war dove.

WTF?

Two Randall Paul hottakes

1. He is in no way, shape, or form a libertarian. People should stop helping him falsely market himself to dumb people.
2. Randall is a bigot and anyone who supports him is a bigot too.

I'm really curious about his bigotry. Do you have some examples/links?