post here when someone decides to run for president in 2016

[Spracne]

It's Richard Perry's race to lose.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Pretty bad lack of reasonable electable options on both sides of this shitty two party system.

Jeb Bush will not be the nominee. The GOP will have plenty of options.

[Headinjun]

Pretty bad lack of reasonable electable options on both sides of this shitty two party system.

Jeb Bush will not be the nominee. The GOP will have plenty of options.

I don't know of the options will be suitable though?   You did watch the excerpts from the Iowa crap show right?

[CNS]

Pretty bad lack of reasonable electable options on both sides of this shitty two party system.

Jeb Bush will not be the nominee. The GOP will have plenty of options.

"...reasonable electable. ..."

[Rage Against the McKee]

I really don't know anything about Jeb other than that he is George's brother. I'd have to learn more about him to say he's not a reasonable candidate.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Pretty bad lack of reasonable electable options on both sides of this shitty two party system.

Jeb Bush will not be the nominee. The GOP will have plenty of options.

I don't know of the options will be suitable though?   You did watch the excerpts from the Iowa crap show right?

"Excerpts"? Did you catch a highlight reel on MSNBC? Give me a break.

Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul will all be formidable candidates if they win the nomination, and there could be others. It's early yet.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Mitt's out. http://www.kansas.com/news/nation-world/national/article8617475.html So looks like the establishment can now comfortably coalesce around Jeb. I think the big money donors are in for a rude awakening.

[CNS]

Is jeb not 'pub' porn?  I though he was.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Is jeb not 'pub' porn?  I though he was.

I don't know what that means. He is definitely the establishment favorite due to his endorsement of amnesty and cozy ties with Wall Street (hey look - just the same as the Dems!). He is not the prefered candidate of conservatives.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Is jeb not 'pub' porn?  I though he was.

I don't know what that means. He is definitely the establishment favorite due to his endorsement of amnesty and cozy ties with Wall Street (hey look - just the same as the Dems!). He is not the prefered candidate of conservatives.

I might vote for him if he really is pro-amnesty. It makes a lot of sense that a politician from a state with a lot of illegal immigration would want to hold onto that benefit, so I guess it really wouldn't be that surprising.

[Mr Bread]

I really don't know anything about Jeb other than that he is George's brother. I'd have to learn more about him to say he's not a reasonable candidate.

tasty

[michigancat]

could go here or the vaxers thread

"I've heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking, normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines,"

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/02/02/rand_paul_supports_voluntary_vaccination.html

[CNS]

My god, pubs.   Get your crap together.  Hilary just clowning without effort thanks to Paul  saying stupid crap about vaccinations to cater to the four or five crazy ppl that actually want to discuss it.  If this is how it is going to play out, can we all just agree to concede the election a couple yr's early and save us all money and frustration?

[Mr Bread]

could go here or the vaxers thread

"I've heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking, normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines,"

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/02/02/rand_paul_supports_voluntary_vaccination.html

The state doesn't own your children, parents own their children, and it is an issue of freedom.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Yes, I love the libtard outrage over Paul saying that parents "own" their children in the context of arguing that the government doesn't. Some lady on CNN actually called this a "fringe right-wing talking point." I would guess that if a poll was taken asking whether the government or parents have the right to make decisions for their children, about 98% of respondents would side with the parents. What a "fringe" thing to say.

Just a small taste of the libtard media hysteria we'll be treated to in the next two years.

[star seed 7]

Who is saying that the government owns children? Parents are Guardians, not owners

[michigancat]

libtard outrage

[michigancat]

libtard media hysteria

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Who is saying that the government owns children? Parents are Guardians, not owners

Thanks for clearing that up, captain obvious. Paul wouldn't disagree with you. If you look at the cotnext of his answer, he was simply saying that American citizens have the right to make decisions for their kids as parents - not the government. "The government doesn't own our kids..." Now some of those decisions may be downright stupid (I happen to think the anti-vaccine crowd is pretty dumb), but they still have that right in America.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Paul: "I think vaccines are one of the greatest medical breakthroughs that we’ve had. I’m a big fan, but, you know, for most of our history, they have been voluntary. ... I think they're a good thing but I think the parent should have some input. The state doesn’t own your children; parents own the children and it is an issue of freedom.”

Libtards: WHAT A RADICAL!!! HE SAID PARENTS "OWN" THEIR KIDS!!!!

[michigancat]

I think most people were laughing at Paul for saying vaccines cause mental disorders - that's why I shared the story I shared. don't watch CNN though, so I could be wrong.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

I think most people were laughing at Paul for saying vaccines cause mental disorders - that's why I shared the story I shared. don't watch CNN though, so I could be wrong.

Here is just an example of the liberal slant. The issue of whether parents should be forced to immunize their kids is at least debateable, but The Hill's headline is... Rand Paul: Parents 'own' children, not the state

For conservative candidates, every interview is a potential minefield. The vast majority of the journalists are of the liberal persuasion. Worse, many of them have a not so thinly-veiled partisan bent, ready to pounce on any word they can take out of context.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton tells supportes "Don’t let anybody tell you, that, you know, it's corporations and businesses that create jobs" and you see it on FoxNews and the conservative blogs. The MSM, and other cable news outlets yawn. She "misspoke" - nothing to see here, move along.

[michigancat]

I think most people were laughing at Paul for saying vaccines cause mental disorders - that's why I shared the story I shared. don't watch CNN though, so I could be wrong.

Here is just an example of the liberal slant. The issue of whether parents should be forced to immunize their kids is at least debateable, but The Hill's headline is... Rand Paul: Parents 'own' children, not the state

For conservative candidates, every interview is a potential minefield. The vast majority of the journalists are of the liberal persuasion. Worse, many of them have a not so thinly-veiled partisan bent, ready to pounce on any word they can take out of context.

well, a quick google news search is all about the vaccination quote and really nothing about the "ownership". And Paul doubled down on his vaccinations quote. And we're in the middle of a measles outbreak. No one cares about the ownership quote because it's fairly obvious he misspoke, or at least everyone knew what he meant.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

I think most people were laughing at Paul for saying vaccines cause mental disorders - that's why I shared the story I shared. don't watch CNN though, so I could be wrong.

Here is just an example of the liberal slant. The issue of whether parents should be forced to immunize their kids is at least debateable, but The Hill's headline is... Rand Paul: Parents 'own' children, not the state

For conservative candidates, every interview is a potential minefield. The vast majority of the journalists are of the liberal persuasion. Worse, many of them have a not so thinly-veiled partisan bent, ready to pounce on any word they can take out of context.

well, a quick google news search is all about the vaccination quote and really nothing about the "ownership". And Paul doubled down on his vaccinations quote. And we're in the middle of a measles outbreak. No one cares about the ownership quote because it's fairly obvious he misspoke, or at least everyone knew what he meant.

The measles is being brought here by un-immunized illegal immigrants. Under a legal immigration system, we can require non-citizens to be vaccinated and screened prior to entering the country. It seems a bit absurd to be talking about legally requiring US citizens to immunize their children because we refuse to stop illegal immigration. But I guess that's the backwards country we live in.

[michigancat]

I think most people were laughing at Paul for saying vaccines cause mental disorders - that's why I shared the story I shared. don't watch CNN though, so I could be wrong.

Here is just an example of the liberal slant. The issue of whether parents should be forced to immunize their kids is at least debateable, but The Hill's headline is... Rand Paul: Parents 'own' children, not the state

For conservative candidates, every interview is a potential minefield. The vast majority of the journalists are of the liberal persuasion. Worse, many of them have a not so thinly-veiled partisan bent, ready to pounce on any word they can take out of context.

well, a quick google news search is all about the vaccination quote and really nothing about the "ownership". And Paul doubled down on his vaccinations quote. And we're in the middle of a measles outbreak. No one cares about the ownership quote because it's fairly obvious he misspoke, or at least everyone knew what he meant.

The measles is being brought here by un-immunized illegal immigrants.

Is it?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2015/01/20/five-things-to-know-about-the-disneyland-measles-outbreak/