Author Topic: UTEP +31  (Read 5675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
UTEP +31
« on: September 21, 2014, 05:32:20 PM »
 :cheese:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
bears are fast...

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2014, 05:35:38 PM »
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU
bears are fast...

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30591
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2014, 05:56:17 PM »
UT at -16 feels like a suckers bet. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2014, 06:07:10 PM »
UT at -16 feels like a suckers bet.

Agreed. I don't think they can set the total low enough either. 16 points is a ton in a 20-10 game
bears are fast...

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2014, 06:08:30 PM »
Is UTEP really shitty again?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2014, 07:22:30 PM »
Is UTEP really shitty again?
my question as well, 31 points is a ton vs a d1 school

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64303
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2014, 07:27:10 PM »
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

utep
have no idea on tech/osu
ut
smu
baylor
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2014, 08:28:16 PM »
Yes, UTEP is that bad. With that said, I doubt we cover that.

Also, don't underestimate how truly awful SMU is. They lost to UNT 43-6

bears are fast...

Offline Big Sam

  • King of the Tucks
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1033
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2014, 08:38:02 PM »
Is UTEP really shitty again?

Edged New Mexico and New Mexico State.  Barely lost to Texas Tech.

Either UTEP has plummeted a lot in the past week, or KSU's performance vs. Auburn actually gained some respect from the betting community and thus they have to set a high line to get action on the Miners.

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2014, 09:05:03 PM »
The Baylor line is money

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2014, 09:32:24 PM »
The Baylor line is money

We will play ISU if we play it at all.  Night game in Ames, on grass, potentially shitty weather and Bear has UT on deck.
bears are fast...

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2014, 09:44:07 PM »
no f'ing way we cover that spread.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2014, 10:49:55 PM »
Apparently UTEP really sucks at passing and defense.  They have a guy averaging about 180 yards rushing per game though.

Auburn ultra - lite?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2014, 11:06:14 PM »
would not bet, but if i did it would be on kstate.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2014, 11:26:27 PM by Rick RowdyBoyy Daris »

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2014, 11:23:35 PM »
KSU covers.

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #15 on: September 22, 2014, 10:15:52 AM »
making a phone call for the Baylor game RIGHT NOW...!!

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29413
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #16 on: September 22, 2014, 11:56:30 AM »
I like that KU to cover.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27139
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2014, 12:19:41 PM »
I'd bet on ISU and SMU but I never bet on games so its not like I know what I'm talking about

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44981
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #18 on: September 22, 2014, 12:21:15 PM »
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44981
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2014, 12:32:12 PM »
I'd bet on ISU and SMU but I never bet on games so its not like I know what I'm talking about

If you're judging by this seasons results only SMU is the worst team in the FBS.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2014, 12:46:33 PM »
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

I agree on all but Baylor... I'd be on ISU for the same reason I'd be on ku though.  Baylor vs UT next week, home team, and warm weather team traveling to potential cold/shitty weather.  We're lucky the ISU game was at 11am.  I'm not sure we woulda gotten out un-scathed if it were a 7:15pm kick.

bears are fast...

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44981
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2014, 01:02:07 PM »
Others in Big XII

Tech +15 @ Okie Lite
UT -16 @ ku
TCU -28 @SMU
Baylor -23.5 @ ISU

UTEP
Tech
KU
TCU
Baylor

That UT/KU line is a joke. The only way UT covers that is if KU scores less than 6.

I agree on all but Baylor... I'd be on ISU for the same reason I'd be on ku though.  Baylor vs UT next week, home team, and warm weather team traveling to potential cold/shitty weather.  We're lucky the ISU game was at 11am.  I'm not sure we woulda gotten out un-scathed if it were a 7:15pm kick.

ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37171
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2014, 01:05:04 PM »
I don't like Texas -16 because I think Texas is a pretty bad football team. They are going to be looking past KU and they aren't good enough to be looking past anybody. It's the Kansas Jayhawks and they are coached by Chuck Weis, so it wouldn't be surprising to see them lose by 50, but if they play a good game, I think they are capable of beating Texas.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39257
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2014, 01:05:07 PM »
yeah UTEP is not that bad at all, and just had a bye week, and we just got our hearts ripped out by that guy with the sweater vest

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: UTEP +31
« Reply #24 on: September 22, 2014, 01:09:34 PM »


ISU is really really really bad defensively. The first 6 quarters of the season is much more indicative of their performance than the last 6. Really through the first 2 games the only good quarter of football that defense has played is the 3rd quarter against us. And as masochistic as ISU fans are, turning up in the numbers that they do, Jack Trice stadium is not loud at all. I would be stunned if Baylor doesn't score 56+

Maybe they will... I haven't bet it yet but IF I do, I'm taking ISU.   Strange crap happens up there at night.  I was stunned that they hung with us the last two times, I was stunned when they upset oSu 3 yrs ago, I was stunned when they took UT to the wire last fall, etc., etc., etc.

You might very well be right, however with Baylor in a look-ahead spot on natural grass in front of a bunch of drunk corn-farmers is not the ideal spot to give 3TD's IMHO.

bears are fast...