Author Topic: 2014 college football  (Read 126250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BackPayne

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1150 on: December 29, 2014, 08:25:44 PM »
Arkansas's Martrell Spaight..wasn't he thinking of coming here?    :Crybaby:

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13772
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1151 on: December 29, 2014, 08:33:15 PM »
Arkansas's Martrell Spaight..wasn't he thinking of coming here?    :Crybaby:
I believe so.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9593
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1152 on: December 29, 2014, 08:36:52 PM »
Arkansas's Martrell Spaight..wasn't he thinking of coming here?    :Crybaby:
I believe so.

Verbally committed then flipped.

Offline BackPayne

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1153 on: December 29, 2014, 08:38:42 PM »
Damn. He would have made a huge difference for us.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1154 on: December 29, 2014, 08:39:50 PM »
that was a catch

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51707
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1155 on: December 29, 2014, 09:14:10 PM »
Wow Texas is ass

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30576
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1156 on: December 29, 2014, 09:16:51 PM »
The entire big 12 is a steaming hot pile of garbage except for the top 3
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1157 on: December 29, 2014, 09:18:01 PM »
what a showing today for the big 12  :flush:

Offline BackPayne

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1158 on: December 29, 2014, 09:18:24 PM »
The entire big 12 is a steaming hot pile of garbage except for the top 3

What a shitty day for the Big 12.  :facepalm:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1159 on: December 29, 2014, 10:17:31 PM »
Texas might have the dumbest rough ridin' players on the planet.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline doompaul

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1160 on: December 29, 2014, 10:22:02 PM »
what a showing today for the big 12  :flush:

Especially OU. It's starting to look like a long shot for us to beat UCLA. OU was our best win of the year and they are not a good team.


Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22292
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1161 on: December 29, 2014, 10:49:48 PM »
doompaul: stop with the stupid pictures and gifs.

anyways, people on twitter (DJamer wally) are saying that the big 12's lousy performance today is further proof that we need to expand.  i have no idea how the big 12 doing poorly in bowl games and the need for expansion are related, but, here we are.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline BackPayne

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1162 on: December 29, 2014, 10:57:52 PM »
doompaul: stop with the stupid pictures and gifs.

anyways, people on twitter (DJamer wally) are saying that the big 12's lousy performance today is further proof that we need to expand.  i have no idea how the big 12 doing poorly in bowl games and the need for expansion are related, but, here we are.

Because he is a moron.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1163 on: December 29, 2014, 11:00:37 PM »
what is DJamer wally's @? I am evidently missing out on some of the choicest twittering in college football and it makes me sad.

Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1164 on: December 29, 2014, 11:01:13 PM »
I was at the Texas game, and they looked scary weak then. Tonight doesn't surprise me. Also, Bielema looks like Huggins out there waddling around. Southern cooking is going to kill him.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29155
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1165 on: December 29, 2014, 11:02:54 PM »

what is DJamer wally's @? I am evidently missing out on some of the choicest twittering in college football and it makes me sad.

Call_me_wallace

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1166 on: December 29, 2014, 11:06:46 PM »
wally blocked me so long ago, i miss seeing his dumbass tweets  :frown:

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1167 on: December 30, 2014, 08:22:37 AM »
Texas might have the dumbest rough ridin' players on the planet.

Do they take intelligence into the star rankings at all? It seems like that would be a more accurate metric for talent. Like say if you are a 2 star receiver with an offer from an Ivy league that bumps you up to 4 star status.

But if you are a 5 star talent who struggles to spell his own name you are only a 3 star.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19134
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1168 on: December 30, 2014, 08:30:45 AM »
Texas might have the dumbest rough ridin' players on the planet.

Do they take intelligence into the star rankings at all? It seems like that would be a more accurate metric for talent. Like say if you are a 2 star receiver with an offer from an Ivy league that bumps you up to 4 star status.

But if you are a 5 star talent who struggles to spell his own name you are only a 3 star.
That is not a very smart viewpoint. 2-stars.
:adios:

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1169 on: December 30, 2014, 08:48:14 AM »
Texas might have the dumbest rough ridin' players on the planet.

Do they take intelligence into the star rankings at all? It seems like that would be a more accurate metric for talent. Like say if you are a 2 star receiver with an offer from an Ivy league that bumps you up to 4 star status.

But if you are a 5 star talent who struggles to spell his own name you are only a 3 star.

Agreed, but there should be a sliding scale based on position. The NFL has the Wonderlic test and this doesn't seem much different.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1170 on: December 30, 2014, 08:59:35 AM »
Texas might have the dumbest rough ridin' players on the planet.

Do they take intelligence into the star rankings at all? It seems like that would be a more accurate metric for talent. Like say if you are a 2 star receiver with an offer from an Ivy league that bumps you up to 4 star status.

But if you are a 5 star talent who struggles to spell his own name you are only a 3 star.

Agreed, but there should be a sliding scale based on position. The NFL has the Wonderlic test and this doesn't seem much different.

What other positions would be the most important for intelligence. Based entirely off of that KU Cornerback who plays in the AFC somewhere, I would assume CBs dont have to be that smart. My list from most need for intelligence to least. Edit it how you wish.

QB
LB
PR
WR
RB
DE
SS
OL
FS
DL
K
P
KR
CB

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1171 on: December 30, 2014, 09:05:34 AM »
Texas might have the dumbest rough ridin' players on the planet.

Do they take intelligence into the star rankings at all? It seems like that would be a more accurate metric for talent. Like say if you are a 2 star receiver with an offer from an Ivy league that bumps you up to 4 star status.

But if you are a 5 star talent who struggles to spell his own name you are only a 3 star.

Agreed, but there should be a sliding scale based on position. The NFL has the Wonderlic test and this doesn't seem much different.

What other positions would be the most important for intelligence. Based entirely off of that KU Cornerback who plays in the AFC somewhere, I would assume CBs dont have to be that smart. My list from most need for intelligence to least. Edit it how you wish.

QB
LB
PR
WR
RB
DE
SS
OL
FS
DL
K
P
KR
CB
WR needs to be lower on that list and FS needs to be much higher. Other than that not bad.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37158
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1172 on: December 30, 2014, 09:08:38 AM »
You don't have to be that smart to play football, guys. This goes for every position on the field.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29383
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1173 on: December 30, 2014, 09:40:28 AM »
what a showing today for the big 12  :flush:

Especially OU. It's starting to look like a long shot for us to beat UCLA. OU was our best win of the year and they are not a good team.

I removed your pics, because at least one of them was triggering nsfw warnings for some people.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21742
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 college football
« Reply #1174 on: December 30, 2014, 09:44:10 AM »
OL
QB
LB
SS
FS
DE
DL
RB
CB
WR
KR
PR
K
P