Author Topic: "Inequality For All"  (Read 12241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19125
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #25 on: July 21, 2014, 11:48:05 AM »
No part of this discussion is remotely related to the content of the documentary.
Well that may change as soon as we all have time to watch it. It may not though.
:adios:

Offline illBisonYourdele

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 249
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #26 on: July 21, 2014, 11:50:22 AM »
all this genetics/race talk and no dick jokes...


Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29132
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #27 on: July 21, 2014, 11:51:49 AM »
i thought metalhead finally released his top 10 albums list

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37005
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #28 on: July 21, 2014, 11:55:20 AM »
i thought metalhead finally released his top 10 albums list

Well, he is a libtard. Maybe he just decided that all albums are equal and should each get a trophy. :lol:

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #29 on: July 21, 2014, 12:09:58 PM »
i thought metalhead finally released his top 10 albums list

Well, he is a libtard. Maybe he just decided that all albums are equal and should each get a trophy. :lol:

You know very little about me.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53585
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #30 on: July 21, 2014, 12:21:40 PM »
i thought metalhead finally released his top 10 albums list

:lol:

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #31 on: July 21, 2014, 12:26:29 PM »
i thought metalhead finally released his top 10 albums list

:lol:

that was pretty funny.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #32 on: July 21, 2014, 12:59:27 PM »
They bring Robert Reich on CNBC every once in a while to make fun of him. He's actually not very smart. I think he worked in the Clinton administration and now writes blogs for the SF newspaper.

His intelligence is evidenced by the fact that saying "inequality for all" is just another way of saying, "everyone is equal," which I doubt is the subject of the "documentary".
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2014, 01:01:47 PM »
Rhodes scholar, Alumnus of Dartmouth, Oxford and Yale. Nope, not intelligent.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #34 on: July 21, 2014, 01:48:11 PM »
I really resent that I'm not an NFL Quarterback. It's 'cause I was discriminated against as a child. We should pass some laws to fix that. But, as long as we're drafting the laws, I'd prefer to just be paid like an NFL QB and not have toa ctually do the work, take the hits, etc. Can we make this happen already?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37005
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2014, 01:49:50 PM »
I really resent that I'm not an NFL Quarterback. It's 'cause I was discriminated against as a child. We should pass some laws to fix that.

Yep. Next thing you know, the libtards will decide NFL players make too much and cap their salaries.

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7618
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #36 on: July 21, 2014, 01:51:35 PM »
Rhodes scholar, Alumnus of Dartmouth, Oxford and Yale. Nope, not intelligent.

Is George Bush intelligent in your opinion?

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20413
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #37 on: July 21, 2014, 01:57:29 PM »
George Bush is very intelligent.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #38 on: July 21, 2014, 02:02:02 PM »
So there shouldn't be stratification? McDs fry cook should be able to live in the same place, eat the same food, and drive the same car as a neurosurgeon? Genetics has a lot to do with reaching those levels of employment.
I agree that not everyone is equal. I believe that it is just not genetics per se, but also the environment that your genetics were conceived in.

Do I know how to rectify this situation? No. But I know that being born a decent looking, slim white male, from a middle middle class family affords be more opportunity without figuring in my above average intellect.

Agree with everything here except the "slim white male" bit. Success is a combination of many factors, none of which can be equalized by laws or redistribution. Genetics matters. Luck matters. Upbringing matters. Family matters. There's nothing wrong with parents passing on what they accumulate as a springboard for their children. That's part of the American Dream.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20652
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #39 on: July 21, 2014, 02:05:59 PM »

So there shouldn't be stratification? McDs fry cook should be able to live in the same place, eat the same food, and drive the same car as a neurosurgeon? Genetics has a lot to do with reaching those levels of employment.
I agree that not everyone is equal. I believe that it is just not genetics per se, but also the environment that your genetics were conceived in.

Do I know how to rectify this situation? No. But I know that being born a decent looking, slim white male, from a middle middle class family affords be more opportunity without figuring in my above average intellect.

Agree with everything here except the "slim white male" bit. Success is a combination of many factors, none of which can be equalized by laws or redistribution. Genetics matters. Luck matters. Upbringing matters. Family matters. There's nothing wrong with parents passing on what they accumulate as a springboard for their children. That's part of the American Dream.

So you agree that SDK is hawt?

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #40 on: July 21, 2014, 02:09:25 PM »

So there shouldn't be stratification? McDs fry cook should be able to live in the same place, eat the same food, and drive the same car as a neurosurgeon? Genetics has a lot to do with reaching those levels of employment.
I agree that not everyone is equal. I believe that it is just not genetics per se, but also the environment that your genetics were conceived in.

Do I know how to rectify this situation? No. But I know that being born a decent looking, slim white male, from a middle middle class family affords be more opportunity without figuring in my above average intellect.

Agree with everything here except the "slim white male" bit. Success is a combination of many factors, none of which can be equalized by laws or redistribution. Genetics matters. Luck matters. Upbringing matters. Family matters. There's nothing wrong with parents passing on what they accumulate as a springboard for their children. That's part of the American Dream.

So you agree that SDK is hawt?
:gocho:

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63558
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #41 on: July 21, 2014, 02:14:29 PM »
I think ksu has never seen the movie trading places
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37005
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #42 on: July 21, 2014, 02:16:16 PM »
I think ksu has never seen the movie trading places

liberal propaganda

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #43 on: July 21, 2014, 02:19:04 PM »
Rhodes scholar, Alumnus of Dartmouth, Oxford and Yale. Nope, not intelligent.

Is George Bush intelligent in your opinion?

Yes, it takes a great deal of intelligence to graduate from Yale. Also, you should be more specific as to which George Bush you are referring to.

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7618
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #44 on: July 21, 2014, 02:21:32 PM »
Rhodes scholar, Alumnus of Dartmouth, Oxford and Yale. Nope, not intelligent.

Is George Bush intelligent in your opinion?

Yes, it takes a great deal of intelligence to graduate from Yale. Also, you should be more specific as to which George Bush you are referring to.

I was referring to the one with the masters degree from Harvard.

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #45 on: July 21, 2014, 02:23:34 PM »
Rhodes scholar, Alumnus of Dartmouth, Oxford and Yale. Nope, not intelligent.

Is George Bush intelligent in your opinion?

Yes, it takes a great deal of intelligence to graduate from Yale. Also, you should be more specific as to which George Bush you are referring to.

I was referring to the one with the masters degree from Harvard.

I really appreciate that you wanted to call me a hypocrite.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #46 on: July 21, 2014, 02:35:21 PM »
The problem is when the inequality becomes so great people don't even have a hope of moving up in classes. I.e. the Robber Baron days in America.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #47 on: July 21, 2014, 02:41:40 PM »
To expand on that thought I belive the "free market" will always lead to a few big winners and alot of losers. Hence it was government intervention that created the middle class in the 20th century.

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #48 on: July 21, 2014, 02:46:14 PM »
To expand on that thought I belive the "free market" will always lead to a few big winners and alot of losers. Hence it was government intervention that created the middle class in the 20th century.

I liked the point that he made regarding that there is no "free market" and that there never really has been.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53585
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: "Inequality For All"
« Reply #49 on: July 21, 2014, 02:53:19 PM »
There's nothing wrong with parents passing on what they accumulate as a springboard for their children. That's part of the American Dream.

Agreed, but government-sanctioned discrimination created a disproportionate distribution of springboards that still exists. Should the government have any responsibility to attempt to correct this mistake in any way?