0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
When you're genuinely upset over killing brutal murderers, I think you've lost perspective. Just my Carry on with your butthurtiness.
A more efficient and humane way to kill someone is to cut their head off with a guillotine. It is telling that we don't do that.
Just remove them from society until they show the ability to contribute. Cut funding to prisons with high recidivism rates.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 19, 2014, 04:38:40 PMWhen you're genuinely upset over killing brutal murderers, I think you've lost perspective. Just my Carry on with your butthurtiness.what about killing a non-zero amount of innocent people in the process?
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 19, 2014, 03:44:04 PMQuote from: CNS on November 19, 2014, 03:12:29 PMSo, if ppl are now ok with execution by bullet, why does it have to be a squad instead of just a machine or something? I mean, the process can be exactly like the lethal injection, tie them down, give them a huge sedative to make them sleep, except then have a machine or person shoot them in the head rather than injecting them with the killing drug cocktail. What's hilarious is that you've made a man pulling a trigger compared to a man pushing a button on a machine or squeezing a syringe as an important distinction in your analysis.At least with a firing squad you don't know who actually killed him, right?
Quote from: CNS on November 19, 2014, 03:12:29 PMSo, if ppl are now ok with execution by bullet, why does it have to be a squad instead of just a machine or something? I mean, the process can be exactly like the lethal injection, tie them down, give them a huge sedative to make them sleep, except then have a machine or person shoot them in the head rather than injecting them with the killing drug cocktail. What's hilarious is that you've made a man pulling a trigger compared to a man pushing a button on a machine or squeezing a syringe as an important distinction in your analysis.
So, if ppl are now ok with execution by bullet, why does it have to be a squad instead of just a machine or something? I mean, the process can be exactly like the lethal injection, tie them down, give them a huge sedative to make them sleep, except then have a machine or person shoot them in the head rather than injecting them with the killing drug cocktail.
Quote from: puniraptor on November 19, 2014, 04:50:00 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 19, 2014, 04:38:40 PMWhen you're genuinely upset over killing brutal murderers, I think you've lost perspective. Just my Carry on with your butthurtiness.what about killing a non-zero amount of innocent people in the process?If you're really concerned about that, you haven't been following the number of appeals death row murderers get now. I doubt most anti death penalty folks actually believe this though.
mock executions most of the time but actual executions enough of the time to keep potential offenders on their toes.
Quote from: bubbles4ksu on November 19, 2014, 09:23:21 PMmock executions most of the time but actual executions enough of the time to keep potential offenders on their toes.you stole that idea from dax in the soccer suggestions thread
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 19, 2014, 09:17:28 PMQuote from: puniraptor on November 19, 2014, 04:50:00 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 19, 2014, 04:38:40 PMWhen you're genuinely upset over killing brutal murderers, I think you've lost perspective. Just my Carry on with your butthurtiness.what about killing a non-zero amount of innocent people in the process?If you're really concerned about that, you haven't been following the number of appeals death row murderers get now. I doubt most anti death penalty folks actually believe this though.How many appeals should an innocent person get before it's OK to kill them?
If prisons are too expensive we should outsource incarceration to a third world country, like we do everything else.
Quote from: puniraptor on November 19, 2014, 09:20:30 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 19, 2014, 09:17:28 PMQuote from: puniraptor on November 19, 2014, 04:50:00 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 19, 2014, 04:38:40 PMWhen you're genuinely upset over killing brutal murderers, I think you've lost perspective. Just my Carry on with your butthurtiness.what about killing a non-zero amount of innocent people in the process?If you're really concerned about that, you haven't been following the number of appeals death row murderers get now. I doubt most anti death penalty folks actually believe this though.How many appeals should an innocent person get before it's OK to kill them?Huh. No troll, you actually believe that our current justice system, with all it's procedural safeguards, is still executing innocent people? Ok. Do you have someone in mind who you think is innocent?
Can I push the button from my living room?
Quote from: 8manpick on November 20, 2014, 07:11:14 AMCan I push the button from my living room?lol
I understand there isn't any distinction btwn triggers and buttons in that scenario. I also understand the traditional reason for the firing squad in it providing the ability to not know for sure who killed the person. What I am saying is that the lethal injection model doesn't allow for a squad of ppl to be unsure and the firing squad method assumes it is acceptable to shoot someone. Why not simplify it all and merge the two?
Quote from: bubbles4ksu on November 20, 2014, 08:03:52 AMQuote from: 8manpick on November 20, 2014, 07:11:14 AMCan I push the button from my living room?lolMaybe 8 different people push a button from their living rooms, but only one button does the killing. That way nobody knows who actually killed the person?Gonna win 'em all!