0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Well, Statcast might want to recalibrate their homerun measuring system because that ball didn't go anywhere near 415 feet.
Quote from: Brock Landers on May 22, 2015, 12:27:24 PMWell, Statcast might want to recalibrate their homerun measuring system because that ball didn't go anywhere near 415 feet.do you have a bionic eye?
Quote from: roidhead on May 22, 2015, 12:31:03 PMQuote from: Brock Landers on May 22, 2015, 12:27:24 PMWell, Statcast might want to recalibrate their homerun measuring system because that ball didn't go anywhere near 415 feet.do you have a bionic eye?No, just a normal human eye that can see the 339 foot mark indicated on the wall. The ball went maybe 30 or 40 feet further than that. Not trying to argue with our guy mocat or anybody else but I mainly don't want that mulleted fuckface Bumgarner getting any more credit for the length of his homerun.
Quote from: Brock Landers on May 22, 2015, 12:44:51 PMQuote from: roidhead on May 22, 2015, 12:31:03 PMQuote from: Brock Landers on May 22, 2015, 12:27:24 PMWell, Statcast might want to recalibrate their homerun measuring system because that ball didn't go anywhere near 415 feet.do you have a bionic eye?No, just a normal human eye that can see the 339 foot mark indicated on the wall. The ball went maybe 30 or 40 feet further than that. Not trying to argue with our guy mocat or anybody else but I mainly don't want that mulleted fuckface Bumgarner getting any more credit for the length of his homerun. are you saying that your eyes are more accurate than vectors?!
I hate no no
pitches