Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335445 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3400 on: January 12, 2017, 03:59:58 PM »
Weird that lib is so obsessed with fake news.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3402 on: January 15, 2017, 11:33:05 AM »
No more pay-to-play for sale?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3405 on: May 11, 2017, 02:52:53 PM »
Well she won't receive my vote, I guarantee you that
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3406 on: May 11, 2017, 03:29:34 PM »
SMDH many of the paranoid New McCarthyites thought she wasn't corrupt.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3407 on: May 11, 2017, 03:42:18 PM »
Good thing she's not the President.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3408 on: May 11, 2017, 03:44:29 PM »
It's comical at this point.

http://circa.com/politics/clinton-pressured-bangladesh-prime-minister-personally-to-help-foundation-donor

If you weren't a crazy person you'd focus on donations from the Sauds instead of linking an article about Hilldawg intervening on behalf of a Nobel winner operating a microloan bank who gave Bill between $25k-50k.

The last 80% of that piece goes on to say that her "intervention" was legal. Did you even read it? I went to the author's twitter and guess what her pinned tweet concerned???

B E N G H A Z I
E
N
G
H
A
Z
I

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3409 on: May 11, 2017, 03:48:24 PM »
It's comical at this point.

http://circa.com/politics/clinton-pressured-bangladesh-prime-minister-personally-to-help-foundation-donor

If you weren't a crazy person you'd focus on donations from the Sauds instead of linking an article about Hilldawg intervening on behalf of a Nobel winner operating a microloan bank who gave Bill between $25k-50k.

The last 80% of that piece goes on to say that her "intervention" was legal. Did you even read it? I went to the author's twitter and guess what her pinned tweet concerned???

B E N G H A Z I
E
N
G
H
A
Z
I

The legality is dubious at best and your about 8 months behind the curb on the Saudi discussion.   

Pay to play, friend.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3410 on: May 11, 2017, 04:01:31 PM »
you discredit the pay for play point by bringing up a phone call to help out a 70yr old philanthropist when you could discuss saudi money. it doesn't matter if it's 8-months late and the 10,000th time.

almost every hillary mention by republicans since november has been moronic, her taking money from the sauds is her only relevance now.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3411 on: May 11, 2017, 04:30:36 PM »
you discredit the pay for play point by bringing up a phone call to help out a 70yr old philanthropist when you could discuss saudi money. it doesn't matter if it's 8-months late and the 10,000th time.

almost every hillary mention by republicans since november has been moronic, her taking money from the sauds is her only relevance now.

It's completely separate.  I was talking about the Clinton's and the Saudi's months,  even years ago (among so very many corrupt things).   It's essentially understood.

Of course what you're not acknowledging is the quid-pro-quo and the highly dubious legal standing of a sitting SOS going to bat with a foreign government for a contributor to her husbands (and hers) highly corrupt Foundation. 

But if you want to continue to flail, please continue   

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3412 on: May 14, 2017, 06:58:57 AM »
Hillary Clinton accepts money from foreign theocrats while serving as secretary is "not important".

Don having a hotel in russia is a "smoking gun".

Lunatics
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3413 on: May 14, 2017, 08:51:37 AM »
I'm not looking to argue which is worse or defend anything. They are both receiving or have received money that may influence their decisions. Correct?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3414 on: May 16, 2017, 12:05:52 AM »
Snitches get stitches . . . or shot in the back.
http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/254852337-story

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3415 on: May 17, 2017, 07:20:46 AM »
Clinton's set up dark money PAC.

With the demise of the highly corrupt money laundering Clinton Foundation, the Clinton's move further into untraceable money. 


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3417 on: June 26, 2017, 09:19:59 AM »
Dirty money, COLUSION, fixing legal problems, dem operatives passing on debate questions, fake dossier's on Trump, well over a billion dollars spent and she still lost.

Amazing

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3418 on: June 29, 2017, 01:56:22 AM »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-reading-harry-potter-builds-compassion-immigrants-refugees-171236704.html
What in the hell Hillary?  Read the constitution you ignoramus.  Do all pissggresives believe this rot?  This old ripper needs to just shut her yaphole.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3419 on: July 13, 2017, 11:25:53 PM »
http://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-operative-who-sought-hillary-emails-killed-himself
SteveDave, Dax, FSD, Libs, SdK did this guy really commit suicide?  Clintons have a dark side of supposedly bumping people off.   I think this is kind of fishy?

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3420 on: July 13, 2017, 11:27:53 PM »
http://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-operative-who-sought-hillary-emails-killed-himself
SteveDave, Dax, FSD, Libs, SdK did this guy really commit suicide?  Clintons have a dark side of supposedly bumping people off.   I think this is kind of fishy?



The suicide note certainly looks legit

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3421 on: July 14, 2017, 07:16:25 AM »
Only thing missing is "nothing to see here"

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3422 on: July 14, 2017, 07:20:09 AM »
I'm not into the Clinton's kill people donald colluded with russia dopey conspiracy theory stuff.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3423 on: July 14, 2017, 07:28:30 AM »
I don't really know. I also don't really care.

I hope it was his own choice and not made under duress from someone else.

In general, I find it plausible that the Clintons have had people killed. I also think there are more important things to worry about. I don't have an opinion one way or another.




Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3424 on: July 14, 2017, 12:30:40 PM »
I'm not into the Clinton's kill people donald colluded with russia dopey conspiracy theory stuff.

It's just funny. 

But the Clinton's had major business dealings with the Russian's just like Trump. 

One problem though. Hillary was SOS when the biggest one was going down.