Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335403 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3350 on: November 23, 2016, 09:09:12 AM »
Question for our legal scholars, can Congress on its own appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary's shady activities when she was SOS.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3351 on: November 26, 2016, 04:03:58 PM »
Hillary = dog vomit.  What the *\©\€|[< is she trying to do to our country.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3352 on: December 20, 2016, 03:27:31 PM »
27 email strings with top secret info, 6 of which are still top secret on Weiner's laptop (for some inexplicable reason), but, still "cleared". 

Sad

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3353 on: December 20, 2016, 04:56:09 PM »
I think Dax has a school yard crush on old HillDawg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3355 on: December 20, 2016, 05:47:24 PM »
Must feel great for the intolerant lefties to know that Hillary War Pig isn't going to get prosecuted.   Total benevolent move by Trump et. al.   

Too bad whistle blowers didn't get the same treatment from Obama. 

Sad

How many Hillary Clinton "supporters" are even on this blog.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3356 on: December 21, 2016, 12:03:36 PM »
Must feel great for the intolerant lefties to know that Hillary War Pig isn't going to get prosecuted.   Total benevolent move by Trump et. al.   

Too bad whistle blowers didn't get the same treatment from Obama. 

Sad

How many Hillary Clinton "supporters" are even on this blog.

There's a thread where many were outed, many others remain closeted.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3357 on: December 21, 2016, 02:21:16 PM »
Must feel great for the intolerant lefties to know that Hillary War Pig isn't going to get prosecuted.   Total benevolent move by Trump et. al.   

Too bad whistle blowers didn't get the same treatment from Obama. 

Sad

How many Hillary Clinton "supporters" are even on this blog.

There's a thread where many were outed, many others remain closeted.

Based on my reading of this blog, her support her mostly seems to exist in dax's mind.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3358 on: December 21, 2016, 02:39:51 PM »
This blog has quite a few principled liberals that won't vote for a bad candidate or horrible person. Can't say the same for the conservatives on this blog. Sad really
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3359 on: December 21, 2016, 03:53:54 PM »
Politico article on FB saying 62% of dems and independents don't want another Hill run.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3360 on: December 21, 2016, 04:15:03 PM »
It's sort of alarming that the number isn't higher than 62%.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3361 on: December 21, 2016, 05:27:19 PM »
It's sort of alarming that the number isn't higher than 62%.

she'll be nine thousand years old and she just lost to donald trump.  it's amazing it isn't 100%.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3362 on: December 21, 2016, 05:39:48 PM »
Politico article on FB saying 62% of dems and independents don't want another Hill run.

I think we have learned by now that the polls are really bad at nailing down percentages of large groups.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3363 on: December 21, 2016, 05:45:52 PM »
I think we have learned by now that the polls are really bad at nailing down percentages of large groups.

i hate stuff like this.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3364 on: December 21, 2016, 05:56:42 PM »
I didn't like Hillary but I still got really defensive about the allegations against her (most of which, if not all were absolutely NOT fake news).   

Sounds about right

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3365 on: December 21, 2016, 09:48:05 PM »
I didn't like Hillary but I still got really defensive about the allegations against her (most of which, if not all were absolutely NOT fake news).   

Sounds about right

Having principle is a hell of a burden dax, be lucky you don't have to carry that weight.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3366 on: December 21, 2016, 10:05:04 PM »
I didn't like Hillary but I still got really defensive about the allegations against her (most of which, if not all were absolutely NOT fake news).   

Sounds about right

Having principle is a hell of a burden dax, be lucky you don't have to carry that weight.

Lol, because we all know Internet blogs is where the truth lies.

Let's see, you were all for Bernie "sell out" Sanders, then Jill "Hillary's Bitch" Stein. 

Principles?  Hilarious.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3367 on: December 21, 2016, 10:14:09 PM »
Must feel great for the intolerant lefties to know that Hillary War Pig isn't going to get prosecuted.   Total benevolent move by Trump et. al.   

Too bad whistle blowers didn't get the same treatment from Obama. 

Sad

How many Hillary Clinton "supporters" are even on this blog.

There's a thread where many were outed, many others remain closeted.

Based on my reading of this blog, her support her mostly seems to exist in dax's mind.

You could save yourself a lot of time by just reading that thread. There were a lot of hilltard supporters. Basically all the libtards.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline gatoveintisiet

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 772
  • the maverick
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3368 on: December 21, 2016, 10:23:28 PM »
if you communicated more bad stuff towards Trump, you were technically supporting his closest contender.
You are dipping into the Kool Aid and you don't even know what flavor it is.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3369 on: December 21, 2016, 11:48:57 PM »
I didn't like Hillary but I still got really defensive about the allegations against her (most of which, if not all were absolutely NOT fake news).   

Sounds about right

Having principle is a hell of a burden dax, be lucky you don't have to carry that weight.

Lol, because we all know Internet blogs is where the truth lies.

Let's see, you were all for Bernie "sell out" Sanders, then Jill "Hillary's Bitch" Stein. 

Principles?  Hilarious.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3370 on: December 21, 2016, 11:54:41 PM »
No pic on tap a talk, but nice effort.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3371 on: December 22, 2016, 12:07:45 PM »
Rebel delegate who communicated directly with Clinton campaign faces possible prosecution.

Sad that they tried to commit election fraud . . . Again

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3372 on: December 22, 2016, 12:53:08 PM »
Comeon let her be President of California.  Or.least.NYC mayor

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3373 on: December 22, 2016, 01:51:05 PM »
Must feel great for the intolerant lefties to know that Hillary War Pig isn't going to get prosecuted.   Total benevolent move by Trump et. al.   

Too bad whistle blowers didn't get the same treatment from Obama. 

Sad

How many Hillary Clinton "supporters" are even on this blog.

There's a thread where many were outed, many others remain closeted.

Based on my reading of this blog, her support her mostly seems to exist in dax's mind.

You could save yourself a lot of time by just reading that thread. There were a lot of hilltard supporters. Basically all the libtards.

how would that save me time?

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3374 on: December 22, 2016, 03:00:13 PM »
Rebel delegate who communicated directly with Clinton campaign faces possible prosecution.

Sad that they tried to commit election fraud . . . Again

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4059162/Surprise-Electoral-college-rebels-wanted-stop-Trump-touch-Clinton-campaign-movement-s-leader-facing-prosecution.html

They should all be in prison.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.