0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: MakeItRain on October 25, 2016, 12:49:50 AMThe issue here isn't what's being inferred, Clinton buying her way out of an indictment, that's flimsy at best. The bigger issue is that an entity was able to donate $675,000 to influence an election, how incredibly gross and an complete affront to democracy.it's too bad this wasn't a cns post. this would be a great one to highlight.
The issue here isn't what's being inferred, Clinton buying her way out of an indictment, that's flimsy at best. The bigger issue is that an entity was able to donate $675,000 to influence an election, how incredibly gross and an complete affront to democracy.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/791366720774606848https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/791462942944399361
zero. Lots of dorks in costumes tho.
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/792050888957423616