Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335295 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2825 on: October 12, 2016, 09:48:20 PM »
perhaps he was trying to imply that you wouldn't be fired if you only grabbed ass once and the grabbee didn't complain.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."


Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2828 on: October 13, 2016, 11:20:51 AM »
I'm rathet troubled by the resident libtard's cavalier attitude about fascism. I can't tell if they support it, or are just too ignorant to recognize it.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2829 on: October 13, 2016, 01:27:52 PM »
I'm rathet troubled by the resident libtard's cavalier attitude about fascism. I can't tell if they support it, or are just too ignorant to recognize it.


You sound like a whiny Latino.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2830 on: October 13, 2016, 01:33:00 PM »
The people who need to be mad are ted cruz and marco rubio.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2831 on: October 13, 2016, 01:33:23 PM »
meanwhile,

Paul Ryan is Partying

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2833 on: October 13, 2016, 02:32:32 PM »
Poor little Marco got manhandled by trump, he'd never survive the clinton machine
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2834 on: October 13, 2016, 02:42:14 PM »
Trump would manhandle Clinton in a republican primary, too.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2835 on: October 13, 2016, 02:46:26 PM »
When the whole contest is who is the biggest crazy bigot, Trump would trump most.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9377
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2836 on: October 13, 2016, 03:01:28 PM »
Team Clinton feared Marco Rubio most of all

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/team-clinton-feared-marco-rubio-most-of-all/article/2604232#.V_0cHWvoTaI.twitter

Well yeah, he's one of the few more saner guys that could win over some sane people.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2837 on: October 13, 2016, 03:18:54 PM »
After Obama whipped her, I think she realized how mortal she was in these things.  Bernie giving her a run for her money wasn't a good sign for her either.  A reasonable Republican would wipe the floor with her.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2838 on: October 14, 2016, 06:04:56 AM »
She needed the DNC to rig the whole thing so she could get nominated this time around.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2839 on: October 14, 2016, 06:07:40 AM »
More WL's and you just have to ask if there was any misogynistic, gay hating Islamic theocrats the Clinton's didn't take money from.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2840 on: October 14, 2016, 01:00:45 PM »
Quote
After the Wiki release, however, one had to wonder why the Clinton camp had bothered to keep the papers secret.

The "secret" speeches in some ways showed Hillary Clinton in a more sympathetic light than her public persona usually allows. Speaking to bankers and masters of the corporate universe, she came off as relaxed, self-doubting, reflective, honest, philosophical rather than political, and unafraid to admit she lacked all the answers.

The transcripts read like freewheeling discussions with friends about how to navigate an uncertain future. In one speech, she conceded a sense of disconnect between the wealthy and the middle class to which she used to belong. This, she said, was a feeling she never had growing up, when the country seemed to be more united.

"And now, obviously," she told executives from Goldman, "I'm kind of far removed because of the life I've lived and the economic ... fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy."

This frank, almost regretful admission rendered her more real in a few sentences than those cliché-ridden speeches about her hardscrabble background as the granddaughter of a Scranton lace-factory worker.

In a speech before the Brazilian Banco Itaú, Clinton talked about her vision for the future. "My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders," she reportedly said. She wanted this economy "as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere."

In classic Clintonian fashion, her camp refused to confirm the authenticity of the emails, while also not denying them either. But why not just own the e-mails? Why all the cagey non-denial denials?

The themes Clinton discussed with the banks were awesome, sweeping and of paramount importance, especially coming from someone in such a unique position to shape the world's future. They collectively represented exactly the honest discussion about what is ahead for all of us that no one in power has ever really had with the rest of the country.


i'd much rather vote for wikileaks clinton than campaign clinton.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2841 on: October 14, 2016, 01:02:47 PM »
campaign clinton is a pandering dumbass. wikileaks clinton knows how to get things done.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2842 on: October 14, 2016, 01:10:40 PM »
Dan Carlin always talks about our govts problem of classifying as much as they can just so something that isn't perceived as an issue now doesn't become an issue eventually.  The culture is to hide everything.  He said that he has spoken with govt ppl that have told him something like 90% of stuff that is classified in the last couple decades is completely irrelevant stuff that has no biz being classified.  Clinton is a perfect example of this, it seems.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9377
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2843 on: October 14, 2016, 01:11:27 PM »
campaign clinton is a pandering dumbass. wikileaks clinton knows how to get things done.

Which is why she will be a pretty decent prez. She's capable of doing it, just so hard to like when she's campaigning.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2844 on: October 14, 2016, 02:22:02 PM »
Hard seeing someone with Hillary's track record of loving war, shitty international relations and constant flip-flopping being a good pres.   

But I suppose Dems have to make themselves feel better, so there's that.

I mean, we're in October of 2016, and still no one can really go beyond  :dunno: when discussing her accomplishments in a positive way.




Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2845 on: October 14, 2016, 03:39:44 PM »
Campaign Clinton definitely tries to dumb things down. She's absolutely right to do so. She's not great at it.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2846 on: October 15, 2016, 08:25:09 AM »
Well, she has to have public policy positions for her Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) neo-fascist constituency, and private policy positions for her corporate and war mongering masters. If her past actions are any indicator, there's a 100% chance her private policies will be implemented.

She is the neo-con the left painted W to be.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2847 on: October 17, 2016, 12:26:50 PM »


gross

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2848 on: October 17, 2016, 12:42:11 PM »
Bombs!
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2849 on: October 17, 2016, 12:50:59 PM »
Bombs!

 :Woot:

still waiting for the one where hillary says the n-word