Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335413 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2650 on: October 04, 2016, 09:25:07 AM »
 :)

Quote
“If we are going to make a major publication about the U.S., we wouldn't do it at 3 a.m.," Assange said at one point, referring to the Eastern daylight start time for the event.

That didn’t go over well with Trump backers who had stayed up through the night, thinking they’d be watching live the unveiling of the death blow to the Clinton campaign.
...
Infowars, the pro-Trump and virulently anti-Clinton media vehicle launched by Texas radio host Alex Jones, had touted the WikiLeaks news conference as “historic” and promised that “the Clintons will be devastated.”

Before Assange took the stage, Jones — who broadcast through the wee hours of the American morning — told viewers and listeners he was so excited he was worried his heart couldn't stand it.

But by the end, Jones realized he’d been played — or in his words, “#wikirolled.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/04/trump-backers-feel-played-as-wikileaks-fails-to-come-through-on-october-surprise/

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2651 on: October 04, 2016, 09:30:02 AM »
I have seen references to alex jones losing his mind last night when nothing happened, I'd like more details
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2652 on: October 04, 2016, 09:45:35 AM »
The thought of anyone staying up or waking up at an ungodly hour because they thought something was going to get leaked literally blows my mind.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2654 on: October 04, 2016, 09:51:39 AM »
:lol:

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2655 on: October 04, 2016, 10:42:56 AM »
10 leaks in 10 weeks, all the election stuff before Nov 8

 :bwpopcorn:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2656 on: October 04, 2016, 11:17:32 AM »
Let's not kid ourselves, if hillcrook and the dnc didn't think WL had anything, they wouldn't be running a 24/7 concerted smear campaign against Assange with the NYT and WaPo. "He's a Putin lapdog, soviet spy, child rapist, and emails aren't evidentiary!!!"
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2657 on: October 04, 2016, 11:47:40 AM »
He doesn't have anything that's going to make her lose.  Sorry FSD.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2658 on: October 04, 2016, 12:07:13 PM »
If Clinton could Clinton the world, but for the USA and not just for the Clintons, that would be amaze and would make all this worth it.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2659 on: October 04, 2016, 03:09:39 PM »
If Clinton could Clinton the world, but for the USA and not just for the Clintons, that would be amaze and would make all this worth it.

here's one.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2660 on: October 04, 2016, 03:16:33 PM »
I had you in mind as I typed that.  :takethebait:

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2661 on: October 04, 2016, 03:22:54 PM »
i'd told you i'd be looking for bait.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2663 on: October 04, 2016, 04:14:00 PM »
Hello. I'm an elite hacker. I use wordpress and have issues with file hosting solutions.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2664 on: October 04, 2016, 04:19:00 PM »
Must be tbt
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2665 on: October 04, 2016, 04:23:17 PM »
he can use xanga for all i care

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2666 on: October 04, 2016, 05:27:46 PM »
Hillbots still pissed that WL exposed the rigged primaries.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2667 on: October 04, 2016, 07:06:43 PM »
Even when the reporter tosses the softball "did you ever joke about..." , she bungles it and comes of as a liar.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/783424443070738433
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

The Big Train

  • Guest

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2669 on: October 05, 2016, 08:58:02 AM »
Is this where we post polls?
:adios:

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2670 on: October 05, 2016, 09:30:36 AM »
i'll take the crap out of that.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15224
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2671 on: October 05, 2016, 09:45:32 AM »
Assange should be all: "we'll release the emails when Trump releases his tax returns."

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85344
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2672 on: October 05, 2016, 09:50:00 AM »
Hello. I'm an elite hacker. I use wordpress and have issues with file hosting solutions.

 :lol:

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2673 on: October 05, 2016, 10:18:58 AM »
Guilty as Sin is a book that will be released soon about MG.  The author points out that Comey did not indict  her because he did not have evidence.  Cheryl Mills worked out an immunity deal with Comey so he could look at her personal computer, but the deal said he could not use anything on it that was past a certain date.  It is my understanding after this date all of data Comey was looking for was erased when it was was subpoenaed by Congress.  Mills cannot be charged for this wiping because of the immunity deal and information on the computer can't be.used even if it shows Mills.ordered the destruction of evidence at the behest of Hillary.  So was.Comey stupid or a lackey?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2674 on: October 05, 2016, 10:25:19 AM »
i'll take the crap out of that.

Uh....that has him leading in two battleground states, one of which has the same EC votes as Kansas.