Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)

[gatoveintisiete]

phew, was worried, though it didn't seem like anyone gave a crap anywhere on the internet

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+foundation&tbm=nws

 

The racists and xenophobes won't be down with this. 

[RickRampus]

Powell emails paint a picture that the Clinton's and Obama's likely hate each other. 

She did pretty much trash Obama at every debate when she was asked why she should be president and in her closing remarks.

Edward Klein has a couple of books out about this, they rough ridin' hate each other, hardcore, like Mizzou and KU hate

[sonofdaxjones]

Gosh, Trumps Foundation sounds a lot like the CF. 

Charity Navigator for a very long time could not rate the CF because they operated in an extremely abnormal and non-traditional manner.   The CF was on Charity Navigator's watch list (bad) for an extended period.    The CF was also regularly starting up and then disbanding sub organizations, making it difficult for Charity watch dogs to follow what they were doing.   Other organizations in this world do that as well, typically organizations up to no good.

[steve dave]

I don't know much about what any of these foundations do but some BBC news guy said the other day that the clinton foundation was ranked like A+ or something by watchdog groups. the trump one probably is too, they didn't say anything about it.

[steve dave]

looks like the major ones confirm that, including the one you said. I'd pick a different hill to die on dax. there are plenty of legitimate HILLs when it come to HILL! 

https://www.charitywatch.org/governance-and-transparency/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680

[sonofdaxjones]

I don't know much about what any of these foundations do but some BBC news guy said the other day that the clinton foundation was ranked like A+ or something by watchdog groups. the trump one probably is too, they didn't say anything about it.

Good for them, it only took them years to produce the documents to get that rating, but golly, they managed to do it.

[sonofdaxjones]

looks like the major ones confirm that, including the one you said. I'd pick a different hill to die on dax. there are plenty of legitimate HILLs when it come to HILL! 

https://www.charitywatch.org/governance-and-transparency/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680

Again, it took them a number of years to get there, and if you do a little research one of the major reasons they couldn't be rated, was because of their structure and the fact that they kept starting and then disbanding sub charities, making it hard to rate them in terms of financial responsibility and effectiveness, and another reason to place the CF on the watch list.

[steve dave]

I'll just trust you on that dax

[MakeItRain]

I don't know much about what any of these foundations do but some BBC news guy said the other day that the clinton foundation was ranked like A+ or something by watchdog groups. the trump one probably is too, they didn't say anything about it.

Good for them, it only too them years to produce the documents to get that rating, but golly, they managed to do it.

Well, anytime Trump wants to do the same he should probably get on that. He announced his presidency 15 months ago.

[sonofdaxjones]

I don't know much about what any of these foundations do but some BBC news guy said the other day that the clinton foundation was ranked like A+ or something by watchdog groups. the trump one probably is too, they didn't say anything about it.

Good for them, it only too them years to produce the documents to get that rating, but golly, they managed to do it.

Well, anytime Trump wants to do the same he should probably get on that. He announced his presidency 15 months ago.

4 + years, 15 months, pretty much the same.

[MakeItRain]

I don't know much about what any of these foundations do but some BBC news guy said the other day that the clinton foundation was ranked like A+ or something by watchdog groups. the trump one probably is too, they didn't say anything about it.

Good for them, it only too them years to produce the documents to get that rating, but golly, they managed to do it.

Well, anytime Trump wants to do the same he should probably get on that. He announced his presidency 15 months ago.

4 + years, 15 months, pretty much the same.

??? Isn't the Trump Foundation older than that

[sonofdaxjones]

I don't know much about what any of these foundations do but some BBC news guy said the other day that the clinton foundation was ranked like A+ or something by watchdog groups. the trump one probably is too, they didn't say anything about it.

Good for them, it only too them years to produce the documents to get that rating, but golly, they managed to do it.

Well, anytime Trump wants to do the same he should probably get on that. He announced his presidency 15 months ago.

4 + years, 15 months, pretty much the same.

??? Isn't the Trump Foundation older than that

Hillary Clinton has essentially been running for president for 10 years, the CF just produced enough information to be rated in the last year. 

[gatoveintisiete]

I've always heard the cf has a internal expense ratio that is obscenely out of whack and that actual charity is a tiny percentage of revenue 

[stunted]

phew, was worried, though it didn't seem like anyone gave a crap anywhere on the internet

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+foundation&tbm=nws

 

 

Not even on the first page of r/politics

[ChiComCat]

Transparency only applies to Clinton - Tax returns, charity information, halfway legitimate medical records are irrelevant to Donald supporters

[CNS]

I need to look up where I read it, but this past weekend I read an article about the clinton foundation that basically said that their foundation hasn't been out there helping the sick and the needy, but more of them placing up and coming political ppl in certain countries to help open up new oil,mining,etc oppys for the friends of the foundation. 

I know this sounds like a dax post, so I guess I will go try to find the article....

[Tobias]

apparently I'm the only one who watched that breitbart or whatever film cat27 posted

[steve dave]

I need to look up where I read it, but this past weekend I read an article about the clinton foundation that basically said that their foundation hasn't been out there helping the sick and the needy, but more of them placing up and coming political ppl in certain countries to help open up new oil,mining,etc oppys for the friends of the foundation. 

I know this sounds like a dax post, so I guess I will go try to find the article....

I'd start with infowars and if you don't find it move on to breitbart (sp?)

[ChiComCat]

apparently I'm the only one who watched that breitbart or whatever film cat27 posted

Some lady in my office watched it and said it was eye opening.  She is going to vote for Trump even harder now

[chum1]

phew, was worried, though it didn't seem like anyone gave a crap anywhere on the internet

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+foundation&tbm=nws

 

 

Not even on the first page of r/politics

Sounds like voter central.

[CNS]

I need to look up where I read it, but this past weekend I read an article about the clinton foundation that basically said that their foundation hasn't been out there helping the sick and the needy, but more of them placing up and coming political ppl in certain countries to help open up new oil,mining,etc oppys for the friends of the foundation. 

I know this sounds like a dax post, so I guess I will go try to find the article....

I'd start with infowars and if you don't find it move on to breitbart (sp?)

I know.  Believe it or not, I don't have those kind of crap sites on my Google News feed.   Also, I just went back to my news app, and it has updated out of the scroll, and Googling "Clinton Foundation" stuff just brings up a bunch of Dax sites. 

Nevermind, carry on.   

[ChiComCat]

I know the initial mission for the CF was to take the best and brightest and have them work on world changing projects.  They'll let somebody else build the schools in Africa, but they would focus on curing cancer or clean water for everyone or whatever.

[sonofdaxjones]

I need to look up where I read it, but this past weekend I read an article about the clinton foundation that basically said that their foundation hasn't been out there helping the sick and the needy, but more of them placing up and coming political ppl in certain countries to help open up new oil,mining,etc oppys for the friends of the foundation. 

I know this sounds like a dax post, so I guess I will go try to find the article....

I'd start with infowars and if you don't find it move on to breitbart (sp?)

I know.  Believe it or not, I don't have those kind of crap sites on my Google News feed.   Also, I just went back to my news app, and it has updated out of the scroll, and Googling "Clinton Foundation" stuff just brings up a bunch of Dax sites. 

Nevermind, carry on.   

Charity Navigator equals Infowars?      Fascinating

[star seed 7]

I believe you cns

[sonofdaxjones]

You Hilbots let us know when the FBI tries to investigate the Trump Foundation 3 times.