Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335097 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2400 on: September 11, 2016, 06:48:59 PM »
Also, part of the vast right-winged conspiracy to out the Clinton's as the subhumans they are.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2401 on: September 11, 2016, 06:50:16 PM »
Alt-Right Conspiracy

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2402 on: September 11, 2016, 06:52:45 PM »
it's events like this that really solidify how crazy the alt-right is
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2403 on: September 11, 2016, 06:54:26 PM »
Lib just wants to see the poor woman die and/or proudly endorses the lies. 

So sad.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2404 on: September 11, 2016, 07:02:38 PM »
Also, why are you getting upset (and you are) about a guy rightfully pointing out how badly the MSM print media has sold out to Hillary?  To the detriment of your guy back when he was in the race. 

#closetedhilbot

Sad

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/05/opinion/hillary-clinton-gets-gored.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0

I would have copied and pasted parts from this article, but for some reason it won't let me. Essentially, legitimate concerns about Trump are drawing the same level of criticism and concern as the fictitious claims raised about Clinton. You can throw the liberal media BS out the window. 

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2405 on: September 11, 2016, 07:06:51 PM »
"Fictitious claims" and "right-winged bullshit" in response to video evidence.
#delusion #thinkprogress
 :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2406 on: September 11, 2016, 07:09:34 PM »
see what i mean
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2407 on: September 11, 2016, 07:16:25 PM »
Also, why are you getting upset (and you are) about a guy rightfully pointing out how badly the MSM print media has sold out to Hillary?  To the detriment of your guy back when he was in the race. 

#closetedhilbot

Sad

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/05/opinion/hillary-clinton-gets-gored.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0

I would have copied and pasted parts from this article, but for some reason it won't let me. Essentially, legitimate concerns about Trump are drawing the same level of criticism and concern as the fictitious claims raised about Clinton. You can throw the liberal media BS out the window.


Fictitious??  Classic Hilbot.   

The woman needs help going up steps, she keels over on 70 degree days, she has Dr. Feelgood on standby at all times just feet away. 

Her closest personnel advisor has familial  ties to hardcore Theocrats who blame 9-11 on the United States. She's received millions in support from some of the worst people on the planet. 

She only escaped prosecution for the emails because of the usual political insider BS. 

She has never met a war she didn't want.  She's driven some of the worst diplomatic decisions in the last twenty years (which is saying something).   

She has the support of big banks, Wall Street and Big Oil.  All the things prog-libs are supposed to hate.  Why?  Because they own both her and Kaine.

She's flat out pandering to minorities, she's voted to build a wall and championed draconian sentencing laws. 

The NYT's is comically in the tank for Hillary. One of the latest Krugman columns was pure comedy.  She gets a couple of softball questions from Lauer and the MSM wants the dude burned at the stake. 

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2408 on: September 11, 2016, 07:17:20 PM »
Now they're saying pneumonia. Bizarre
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2409 on: September 11, 2016, 07:20:16 PM »
Her heart is two sizes too small
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2410 on: September 11, 2016, 07:23:37 PM »
Doesn't mix well with brain swelling blood clots, or whatever caused her to keel over a few years back.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2411 on: September 11, 2016, 08:36:31 PM »
no way in hell she allows death to snatch her before she gets sworn into office.  A vote for Hillary might ultimately be a vote for Kane though.

https://twitter.com/Always_Trump/status/775106986480283649

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2412 on: September 11, 2016, 08:40:01 PM »
Pff

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2413 on: September 11, 2016, 08:42:42 PM »
Asking for someone's health records is a little bit ridiculous. I would never allow the public to see mine, and I'm healthy.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2414 on: September 11, 2016, 08:46:31 PM »
Doesn't mix well with brain swelling blood clots, or whatever caused her to keel over a few years back.

Unfortunately I think it is something more along the lines of Parkinson's.  I wonder if the wikileaks in October is more health related and less classified emails related.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2415 on: September 11, 2016, 08:50:30 PM »
Asking for someone's health records is a little bit ridiculous. I would never allow the public to see mine, and I'm healthy.

It's certainly more relevant than tax returns.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20498
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2416 on: September 11, 2016, 08:53:17 PM »
Asking for someone's health records is a little bit ridiculous. I would never allow the public to see mine, and I'm healthy.

It's certainly more relevant than tax returns.

Tax returns are usually more indicative of behavior/choices.  I think both are relevant to make an informed choice.  Hillary and Trump have both set some terrible precedents for future candidates.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2417 on: September 11, 2016, 08:54:13 PM »
I think it's perfectly reasonable to require a health exam made public for someone wanting the most powerful job in the nation/world.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2418 on: September 11, 2016, 09:24:03 PM »
She's toast

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2419 on: September 12, 2016, 12:16:36 AM »
Also, why are you getting upset (and you are) about a guy rightfully pointing out how badly the MSM print media has sold out to Hillary?  To the detriment of your guy back when he was in the race. 

#closetedhilbot

Sad

Uh, I didn't read the article once I saw it was not about Tim Kaine. Why in the hell would I waste my time reading a column in a tabloid about some dude bitching about media bias? Of course hilz is the benefit of a media bias, is this new?

Lol, nice edit.

Who are you talking to, I didn't edit anything, and why is it so hard for you to ever be clear as to who in the hell you are posting at?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2420 on: September 12, 2016, 07:19:58 AM »
so can the left get biden in there or nah? I'm less excited about her possibly dying if it has to be bernie or kaine.

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2421 on: September 12, 2016, 07:29:40 AM »
Nah, think weekend at Hillarys  :Woot:
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2422 on: September 12, 2016, 08:22:59 AM »
Asking for someone's health records is a little bit ridiculous. I would never allow the public to see mine, and I'm healthy.

It's certainly more relevant than tax returns.

Tax returns are usually more indicative of behavior/choices.  I think both are relevant to make an informed choice.  Hillary and Trump have both set some terrible precedents for future candidates.

I don't think either are relevant. People deserve some amount of privacy.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22252
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2423 on: September 12, 2016, 08:42:08 AM »
Asking for someone's health records is a little bit ridiculous. I would never allow the public to see mine, and I'm healthy.

It's certainly more relevant than tax returns.
If you want to run for president you pretty much make your health a national concern.  If you don't want everyone on the planet knowing your medical history, don't run for president.

Same goes for tax returns too.
Tax returns are usually more indicative of behavior/choices.  I think both are relevant to make an informed choice.  Hillary and Trump have both set some terrible precedents for future candidates.

I don't think either are relevant. People deserve some amount of privacy.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2424 on: September 12, 2016, 08:47:09 AM »
Asking for someone's health records is a little bit ridiculous. I would never allow the public to see mine, and I'm healthy.

It's certainly more relevant than tax returns.

Same goes for tax returns too.
Tax returns are usually more indicative of behavior/choices.  I think both are relevant to make an informed choice.  Hillary and Trump have both set some terrible precedents for future candidates.

I don't think either are relevant. People deserve some amount of privacy.
If you want to run for president you pretty much make your health a national concern.  If you don't want everyone on the planet knowing your medical history, don't run for president.

Would your vote change if you knew Trump or Hillary had some sort of life-threatening disease? We have a system in place to replace the president, and it's not like we've never had one die in office. If you are concerned about the health and mental faculty of your presidential candidate, you really shouldn't nominate somebody who is going to be serving through their 70s.